M A West1, L Loughney2, D Lythgoe3, C P Barben4, R Sripadam5, G J Kemp6, M P W Grocott7, S Jack7. 1. Colorectal Surgery Research Group, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Building, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK mwest@liverpool.ac.uk. 2. Colorectal Surgery Research Group, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Building, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 3. Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, UK. 4. Colorectal Surgery Research Group, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Building, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK. 5. Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK. 6. Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 7. Colorectal Surgery Research Group, Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 3rd Floor Clinical Sciences Building, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, UK Critical Care Research Area, Southampton NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients requiring surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer often additionally undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), of which the effects on physical fitness are unknown. The aim of this feasibility and pilot study was to investigate the effects of NACRT and a 6 week structured responsive exercise training programme (SRETP) on oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] at lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) in such patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 39 consecutive subjects (27 males) with T3-4/N+ resection margin threatened rectal cancer who completed standardized NACRT. Subjects underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline (pre-NACRT), at week 0 (post-NACRT), and week 6 (post-SRETP). Twenty-two subjects undertook a 6 week SRETP on a training bike (three sessions per week) between week 0 and week 6 (exercise group). These were compared with 17 contemporaneous non-randomized subjects (control group). Changes in [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] over time and between the groups were compared using a compound symmetry covariance linear mixed model. RESULTS: Of 39 recruited subjects, 22 out of 22 (exercise) and 13 out of 17 (control) completed the study. There were differences between the exercise and control groups at baseline [age, ASA score physical status, World Health Organisation performance status, and Colorectal Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (CR-POSSUM) predicted mortality]. In all subjects, [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] significantly reduced between baseline and week 0 [-1.9 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3, -2.6; P<0.0001]. In the exercise group, [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] significantly improved between week 0 and week 6 (+2.1 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% CI +1.3, +2.9; P<0.0001), whereas the control group values were unchanged (-0.7 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% CI -1.66, +0.37; P=0.204). CONCLUSIONS: NACRT before rectal cancer surgery reduces physical fitness. A structured exercise intervention is feasible post-NACRT and returns fitness to baseline levels within 6 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT: 01325909.
BACKGROUND: Patients requiring surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer often additionally undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), of which the effects on physical fitness are unknown. The aim of this feasibility and pilot study was to investigate the effects of NACRT and a 6 week structured responsive exercise training programme (SRETP) on oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] at lactate threshold ([Formula: see text]) in such patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 39 consecutive subjects (27 males) with T3-4/N+ resection margin threatened rectal cancer who completed standardized NACRT. Subjects underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline (pre-NACRT), at week 0 (post-NACRT), and week 6 (post-SRETP). Twenty-two subjects undertook a 6 week SRETP on a training bike (three sessions per week) between week 0 and week 6 (exercise group). These were compared with 17 contemporaneous non-randomized subjects (control group). Changes in [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] over time and between the groups were compared using a compound symmetry covariance linear mixed model. RESULTS: Of 39 recruited subjects, 22 out of 22 (exercise) and 13 out of 17 (control) completed the study. There were differences between the exercise and control groups at baseline [age, ASA score physical status, World Health Organisation performance status, and Colorectal Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (CR-POSSUM) predicted mortality]. In all subjects, [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] significantly reduced between baseline and week 0 [-1.9 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3, -2.6; P<0.0001]. In the exercise group, [Formula: see text] at [Formula: see text] significantly improved between week 0 and week 6 (+2.1 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% CI +1.3, +2.9; P<0.0001), whereas the control group values were unchanged (-0.7 ml kg(-1) min(-1); 95% CI -1.66, +0.37; P=0.204). CONCLUSIONS: NACRT before rectal cancer surgery reduces physical fitness. A structured exercise intervention is feasible post-NACRT and returns fitness to baseline levels within 6 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT: 01325909.
Authors: An Ngo-Huang; Nathan H Parker; Xuemei Wang; Maria Q B Petzel; David Fogelman; Keri L Schadler; Eduardo Bruera; Jason B Fleming; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Hendrik Mugele; Nils Freitag; Jannik Wilhelmi; Yanxiang Yang; Sulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Moritz Schumann Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Srijit Banerjee; Kate Manley; Barnabas Shaw; Liane Lewis; Gabriel Cucato; Robert Mills; Mark Rochester; Allan Clark; John M Saxton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Michael J Hughes; Rosie J Hackney; Peter J Lamb; Stephen J Wigmore; D A Christopher Deans; Richard J E Skipworth Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Ryan Howard; Yue S Yin; Lane McCandless; Stewart Wang; Michael Englesbe; David Machado-Aranda Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Katrina A Knight; Chui Hon Fei; Kate F Boland; Daniel R Dolan; Allan M Golder; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan; Douglas H Black; James H Park; Campbell S D Roxburgh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 5.315