Literature DB >> 25271512

The revision rate and occurrence of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 672 consecutive patients.

Carola F van Eck1, Conor Regan, William F Donaldson, James D Kang, Joon Y Lee.   

Abstract

LEVEL III: retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of revision surgery and the occurrence of adjacent segment disease of patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy using more modern-day instrumentation techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been the preferred treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.
METHODS: All patients undergoing ACDF between January of 2000 and December of 2010 were included. Age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, symptoms at presentation, number of levels fused, graft type, and smoking status were recorded. Outcomes included revision rate, reason for revision surgery, time to revision surgery, presence and grade of adjacent segment disease, distance from the instrumentation to the cranial and caudal endplate (plate-to-disc distance), and reporting of symptoms of adjacent segment disease at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were included in this study. The average duration of follow-up was 31 months. One hundred one (15%) patients underwent revision surgery. The reason for revision surgery was adjacent segment disease in 47 (47.5%), pseudarthrosis in 45 (45.5%) and a new problem at a nonadjacent level in 7 (7.1%) of those patients. The need for revision surgery was not affected by patient age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, symptoms at presentation, number of levels fused, plate-to-disc distance or graft type.
CONCLUSION: The revision rate after ACDF is 15%. Most revisions were done for either adjacent segment disease or pseudarthrosis. No specific risk factors for revision surgery were identified in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25271512     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  37 in total

1.  Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients.

Authors:  Martin Skeppholm; Thomas Henriques; Tycho Tullberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry.

Authors:  Lee Wen-Shen; Maksim Lai Wern Sheng; William Yeo; Tan Seang Beng; Yue Wai Mun; Guo Chang Ming; Mohammad Mashfiqul Arafin Siddiqui
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Philip K Louie; Jeremy Mormol; Jannat M Khan; Kamran Movassaghi; Justin C Paul; Arya Varthi; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Posterior endoscopic cervical foramiotomy and discectomy: clinical and radiological computer tomography evaluation on the bony effect of decompression with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Pang Hung Wu; Yeon Jin Lee; Dae Hwan Kim; Jun Hyung Lee; Kyung-Hoon Yang; Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study.

Authors:  Qingpeng Song; Da He; Xiao Han; Ning Zhang; Jinchao Wang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with and without anterior cervical plating for the treatment of cervical disc herniation-a 25-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Benedikt W Burkhardt; Moritz Brielmaier; Karsten Schwerdtfeger; Joachim M Oertel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhao-Ming Zhong; Shi-Yuan Zhu; Jing-Shen Zhuang; Qian Wu; Jian-Ting Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Luai M Mustafa; Moawiah M Mustafa; Amala Benny; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

10.  Symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery after 1- or 2-level ACDF with plating: peek versus allograft.

Authors:  Abdul Fettah Buyuk; Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Christian J Gaffney; Amir A Mehbod; John M Dawson; Timothy A Garvey; Benjamin Mueller; James D Schwender
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.