Literature DB >> 2527135

Wound classification is more important than site of ulceration in the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.

J Apelqvist1, J Castenfors, J Larsson, A Stenström, C D Agardh.   

Abstract

The importance of wound classification and site of ulceration was evaluated in 314 consecutive diabetic patients with foot ulcers. The ulcers were classified as superficial (through the full thickness of the dermis; n = 150), deep (n = 50), osteomyelitis and/or abscess (n = 46), minor gangrene (n = 39) or major gangrene (n = 29). Wound healing was defined as intact skin for at least 6 months. In patients with superficial and deep ulcers, primary healing occurred in 88% and 78%, respectively, compared with 57% in those patient who developed an abscess and/or osteomyelitis. Only 2 out of 68 patients with gangrene healed (through mummification) without amputation. Patients with gangrene had lower ankle and toe blood pressure than patients with all other types of ulcers. There were only marginal differences in primary healing rate between different ulcer sites. The highest rate was seen in ulcers localized to the metatarsal heads (78%). Patients with multiple ulcers had the lowest primary healing rate (5%) compared with single ulcers at all sites. These differences were probably due to circulatory factors, since patients with multiple ulcers had lower distal perfusion pressures compared with all other groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2527135     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb01221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effective management of diabetic foot ulcers. A review.

Authors:  G Ragnarson-Tennvall; J Apelqvist
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Prediction and monitoring the therapeutic response of chronic dermal wounds.

Authors:  Keith Moore; Roisin McCallion; Richard J Searle; Michael C Stacey; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis: testing choices and their consequences.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; B Littenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.

Authors:  Trientje B Santema; Ellie A Lenselink; Ron Balm; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Prognostic value of the clinical examination of the diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  D Edelman; D M Hough; K N Glazebrook; E Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  [Orthopedic made-to-measure shoes for diabetics. Long-term 5-year outcome].

Authors:  U Illgner; J Wühr; M Rümmler; B Drerup; H H Wetz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study.

Authors:  M A Gershater; M Löndahl; P Nyberg; J Larsson; J Thörne; M Eneroth; J Apelqvist
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  The evaluation of podiatrists, with knowledge and training in diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound, to describe sonographic images of diabetic foot wounds in the United Kingdom and Australia.

Authors:  Charlotte Dando; Georgia Lane; Catherine Bowen; Frances Henshaw
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Factors Related to Severity of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Milad Jalilian; Pegah Ahmadi Sarbarzeh; Sajad Oubari
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.168

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.