| Literature DB >> 25270342 |
Lutz Ehlkes, Anne Caroline Krefis, Benno Kreuels, Ralf Krumkamp, Ohene Adjei, Matilda Ayim-Akonor, Robin Kobbe, Andreas Hahn, Christof Vinnemeier, Wibke Loag, Udo Schickhoff, Jürgen May1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a mosquito-borne parasitic disease that causes severe mortality and morbidity, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. As the vectors predominantly bite between dusk and dawn, risk of infection is determined by the abundance of P. falciparum infected mosquitoes in the surroundings of the households. Remote sensing is commonly employed to detect associations between land use/land cover (LULC) and mosquito-borne diseases. Due to challenges in LULC identification and the fact that LULC merely functions as a proxy for mosquito abundance, assuming spatially homogenous relationships may lead to overgeneralized conclusions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25270342 PMCID: PMC4192530 DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Health Geogr ISSN: 1476-072X Impact factor: 3.918
Proportions of land use/land cover types within a 500 m radius around each household
| Land use/land cover | Median | Minimum | Maximum | Interquartile range | Categories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banana | 19.0% | 0.8% | 36.2% | 6.5% | 0-20%, >20% |
| Built-up areas | 33.7% | 0% | 81.7% | 25.5% | 0-20%, >20-40%, >40% |
| Cacao | 0% | 0% | 47.1% | 0% | Absence, presence |
| Deforested areas | 10.1% | 0.5% | 42.2% | 7.7% | 0-10%, >10% |
| Forest | 0% | 0% | 28.4% | 0% | Absence, presence |
| Oranges | 11.6% | 0% | 46.0% | 13.3% | 0-10%, >10-20%, >20% |
| Palm trees | 5.2% | 0% | 63.6% | 15.4% | 0-10%, >10% |
| Swampy areas | 9.6% | 0.7% | 36.6% | 10.5% | 0-10%, >10% |
| Water | 0.6% | 0% | 3.4% | 0.8% | Absence, presence |
Figure 1Average annual rate of the study participants (A). Local incidence rate ratios (colour), p-values (hatching), and area covered by the respective land use/land cover of spatially varying parameters (B = banana plantations, C = built-up areas with town names, D = cacao plantations, E = forest, F = orange plantations, G = swampy areas). Visualisation of all parameters was conducted via kernel smoothing, using a Gaussian smoothing function (factor = 0.2), and a bandwidth of 0.005049 degrees.
Risk factors of parasitaemia assessed by univariate Poisson regression
| Variable | Incidence rate ratio | P-value (Walds test) | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnic group: Northerners | 1.16 | 0.001 | 1.06 | 1.27 |
| Financial situation¥ | 0.72 | <0.001 | 0.67 | 0.78 |
| Mosquito protection¤ | 0.78 | <0.001 | 0.72 | 0.84 |
| Mother education£ | 0.72 | <0.001 | 0.67 | 0.77 |
| Mother occupation¢ | 1.55 | <0.001 | 1.45 | 1.67 |
| SP-armμ | 0.91 | 0.003 | 0.85 | 0.97 |
| Sickle cell trait (HbAS) | 0.97 | 0.56 | 0.88 | 1.07 |
Categories: ¥good financial situation, ¤uses bed-net/fly-screen, £at least secondary school education, ¢mother works as a farmer, μIPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
Global model of a semi-parametric geographically weighted Poisson regression, assuming all parameters are spatially homogenous
| Variable | Incidence rate ratio | 95% confidence interval | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | <0.001 |
| Banana¶ | 1.06 | 0.99 | 1.15 | 0.10 |
| Built-up areas¶ | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.86 | <0.001 |
| Cacao† | 0.98 | 0.88 | 1.09 | 0.68 |
| Deforested areas§ | 1.01 | 0.93 | 1.10 | 0.83 |
| Forest† | 0.94 | 0.84 | 1.05 | 0.26 |
| Oranges§ | 1.10 | 1.03 | 1.17 | <0.01 |
| Palm trees§ | 0.99 | 0.90 | 1.10 | 0.91 |
| Swampy areas§ | 0.98 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 0.60 |
| Water† | 0.96 | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.45 |
| Ethnic group: Northerners | 1.02 | 0.92 | 1.13 | 0.68 |
| Financial situation¥ | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| Mosquito protection¤ | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.91 | <0.001 |
| Mother’s education£ | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
| Mother’s occupation¢ | 1.38 | 1.28 | 1.48 | <0.001 |
| SP-armμ | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.019 |
Categories: §10%, ¶20%, †not present/present, ¥good financial situation, ¤uses bed-net/fly-screen, £at least secondary school education, ¢mother works as a farmer, μIPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
Final model of the semi-parametric geographically weighted Poisson regression, with global parameters (top) and local parameters (bottom)
| Global variable | Incidence rate ratio | 95% confidence interval | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deforested areas§ | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 0.032 |
| Palm trees§ | 0.86 | 0.71 | 1.03 | 0.11 |
| Water† | 1.16 | 0.94 | 1.44 | 0.17 |
| Ethnic group: Northerners | 1.08 | 0.95 | 1.22 | 0.26 |
| Financial status¥ | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| Mosquito protection¤ | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| Mother’s education£ | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.003 |
| Mother’s occupation¢ | 1.34 | 1.24 | 1.45 | <0.001 |
| SP-armμ | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 0.013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Intercept | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.02 |
| Banana¶ | 1.02 | 0.29 | 1.76 | 0.25 |
| Built-up areas¶ | 0.94 | 0.51 | 2.11 | 0.46 |
| Forest† | 0.90 | 0.05 | 2.95 | 0.51 |
| Cacao† | 1.33 | 0.17 | 6.21 | 0.97 |
| Oranges§ | 1.11 | 0.27 | 2.21 | 0.68 |
| Swampy areas§ | 1.15 | 0.22 | 3.59 | 0.88 |
Categories: §10%, ¶20%, †not present/present, ¥good financial situation, ¤uses bed-net/fly-screen, £at least secondary school education, ¢mother works as a farmer, μIPTi with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.
Figure 2Potential causal diagram of selected LULC variables to