| Literature DB >> 21448277 |
Anne Caroline Krefis1, Norbert Georg Schwarz, Bernard Nkrumah, Samuel Acquah, Wibke Loag, Jens Oldeland, Nimako Sarpong, Yaw Adu-Sarkodie, Ulrich Ranft, Jürgen May.
Abstract
Malaria belongs to the infectious diseases with the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide. As a vector-borne disease malaria distribution is strongly influenced by environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between malaria risk and different land cover classes by using high-resolution multispectral Ikonos images and Poisson regression analyses. The association of malaria incidence with land cover around 12 villages in the Ashanti Region, Ghana, was assessed in 1,988 children <15 years of age. The median malaria incidence was 85.7 per 1,000 inhabitants and year (range 28.4-272.7). Swampy areas and banana/plantain production in the proximity of villages were strong predictors of a high malaria incidence. An increase of 10% of swampy area coverage in the 2 km radius around a village led to a 43% higher incidence (relative risk [RR] = 1.43, p<0.001). Each 10% increase of area with banana/plantain production around a village tripled the risk for malaria (RR = 3.25, p<0.001). An increase in forested area of 10% was associated with a 47% decrease of malaria incidence (RR = 0.53, p = 0.029). Distinct cultivation in the proximity of homesteads was associated with childhood malaria in a rural area in Ghana. The analyses demonstrate the usefulness of satellite images for the prediction of malaria endemicity. Thus, planning and monitoring of malaria control measures should be assisted by models based on geographic information systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21448277 PMCID: PMC3063166 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of the 12 included study villages.
Merger of two satellite images (Ikonos) depicting an area with 12 study villages in the Asante Akim North District, Ashanti Region, central Ghana, West Africa. Areas with a radius of 2 km surrounding the study villages, which were analysed by supervised maximum likelihood classification, are coloured.
Characteristics of the villages.
| Village | Village area | Total population | Population density | Proportion with hospital access | Population study group | Malaria cases | Incidence |
| Agogo | 5.12 | 13559 | 2648 | 90% | 3588 | 1463 | 271.9 |
| Akutuase | 0.61 | 1692 | 2774 | 43% | 214 | 9 | 28.1 |
| Amantena | 0.27 | 890 | 3296 | 55% | 144 | 21 | 97.3 |
| Domeabra | 1.33 | 3509 | 2638 | 42% | 433 | 73 | 112.3 |
| Hwidiem | 1.08 | 1402 | 1298 | 95% | 392 | 147 | 250.3 |
| Juansa | 1.27 | 3992 | 3143 | 40% | 469 | 52 | 73.8 |
| Kyekyebiase | 0.54 | 1801 | 3335 | 46% | 244 | 28 | 76.6 |
| Nyaboo | 1.02 | 1582 | 1551 | 46% | 214 | 28 | 87.2 |
| Obenimase | 0.51 | 1096 | 2149 | 37% | 119 | 15 | 83.9 |
| Patriensah | 0.54 | 4463 | 8265 | 38% | 499 | 92 | 123.0 |
| Pekyerekye | 0.37 | 1692 | 4573 | 45% | 224 | 27 | 80.4 |
| Wioso | 0.34 | 1783 | 5244 | 52% | 273 | 33 | 80.7 |
per km2.
Population according to the national census 2004 [21].
Proportion of people in each village who reported to visit the Agogo hospital, data from Community Survey.
Population of children <15 years of age estimated as a proportion of 42% of the population counted at national census 2004 [22] and an additional proportion of 70% due to inclusion into the study at hospital admittance and by taking into account hospital access.
Study period from May 2007 to November 2008 (18 months).
Incidence in children <15 years (per year and 1,000 children <15 years).
Formula: incidence = 1,000*cases/(total_population*0.42*0.70*hospital_access*1.5).
Figure 2Supervised maximum likelihood classification map (combined NDVI image, the texture bands, and the four spectral bands).
Classification of land cover within a village radius of 2 km with 11 colours indicating different land cover classes. All classes describing the crops banana/plantain, cacao, palm trees producing palm oil fruits, and oranges were mainly mixed fields but dominated by one of these crops. Swampy areas were characterised by either the presence of a river or stream nearby or an agricultural crop cultivated in the vicinity. Water was characterized by a river, stream or lake. Deforested areas were characterized by roads as well as burned, grassy or bushy underground or open spaces. Forest referred to areas with dense tree cover, mostly with a closed canopy.
Proportion (in %) of land cover around a 2 km village centre radius.
| Village radius | Banana/Plantain | Cacao | Palm trees | Oranges | Deforested area and roads | Built-up areas (Houses) | Swampy area | Water | Forest |
| Agogo | 19.7 | 9.5 | 4.5 | 6.9 | 9.2 | 4.1 | 37.0 | 0.1 | 6.4 |
| Akutuase | 11.5 | 10.9 | 4.1 | 28.7 | 9.4 | 1.4 | 4.7 | 1.4 | 27.9 |
| Amantena | 12.1 | 22.2 | 23.3 | 20.4 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 7.5 | 0.1 | 10.1 |
| Domeabra | 9.8 | 26.2 | 23.9 | 22.7 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 |
| Hwidiem | 18.7 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 13.2 | 5.6 | 2.6 | 23.9 | 0.1 | 9.9 |
| Juansa | 9.2 | 25.9 | 24.5 | 24.0 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 5.5 |
| Kyekyebiase | 7.3 | 28.9 | 24.3 | 26.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 0.1 | 5.4 |
| Nyaboo | 17.4 | 15.5 | 13.9 | 2.2 | 19.6 | 3.9 | 8.9 | 0.1 | 15.1 |
| Obenimase | 14.0 | 19.2 | 19.5 | 3.0 | 17.6 | 2.5 | 6.9 | 0.3 | 15.0 |
| Patriensah | 16.2 | 15.1 | 16.5 | 2.3 | 18.4 | 3.4 | 8.9 | 0.0 | 16.0 |
| Pekyerekye | 4.8 | 26.4 | 22.1 | 13.5 | 9.1 | 0.6 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 10.8 |
| Wioso | 9.3 | 14.4 | 5.0 | 22.5 | 10.2 | 0.7 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 28.7 |
Size of each radius 2 km2.
Swampy area: either the presence of a river or stream nearby or near the ground agricultural crops (such as eggplants, maize, tomatoes, pepper).
Correlation coefficients of the cross correlation function between land cover variables using Spearman rank correlation.
| Population density | Built-up areas (Houses) | Deforested area and roads | Forest | Swampy area | Water | Banana/Plantain | Oranges | Cacao | Palm trees | |
| Population density | −0.51 | −0.08 | 0.22 | −0.11 | 0.07 | −0.55 | −0.24 | 0.24 | 0.17 | |
| Built-up areas (Houses) | 0.09 | 0.55 | 0.08 | 0.52 | −0.38 | 0.86 | −0.66 | −0.62 | −0.41 | |
| Deforested area and roads | 0.80 | 0.06 | 0.79 | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.46 | −0.66 | −0.52 | −0.62 | |
| Forest | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.002 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.18 | −0.30 | −0.51 | −0.67 | |
| Swampy area | 0.75 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.66 | −0.03 | 0.64 | −0.78 | −0.42 | −0.43 | |
| Water | 0.84 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.17 | 0.92 | −0.24 | 0.13 | −0.14 | −0.46 | |
| Banana/Plantain | 0.06 | <0.001 | 0.13 | 0.57 | 0.02 | 0.46 | −0.67 | −0.73 | −0.57 | |
| Oranges | 0.46 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.003 | 0.70 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.26 | |
| Cacao | 0.44 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 0.007 | 0.39 | 0.91 | |
| Palm trees | 0.60 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
Note: Above the diagonal are the correlation coefficients r, below all p-values.
Influence of determinants on malaria incidencea.
| Determinant | RR | 95% Confidence Interval | p-value |
| Population density | 0.87 | 0.70–1.07 | 0.176 |
| Built-up areas (houses) | 2.24 | 1.54–3.24 | <0.001 |
| Deforested area and roads | 1.00 | 0.70–1.44 | 0.988 |
| Forest | 0.53 | 0.28–0.99 | 0.029 |
| Swampy area | 1.43 | 1.33–1.55 | <0.001 |
| Water | 0.70 | 0.37–1.32 | 0.270 |
| Banana/Plantain | 3.25 | 2.23–4.76 | <0.001 |
| Oranges | 0.63 | 0.44–0.91 | 0.012 |
| Cacao | 0.48 | 0.33–0.70 | <0.001 |
| Palm trees | 0.59 | 0.43–0.81 | <0.001 |
Poisson regression analysis.
Unit: 1,000/km2.
Unit = 2%.
Unit = 5%.
Unit = 10%.
Unit = 1%.