Literature DB >> 25270228

Risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Shan Cheung1, Mary E Booth2, Olive Kearins3, David Dodwell4.   

Abstract

Despite surgical removal of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), recurrences still occur. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the risk of invasive recurrence following surgery and investigated factors which may be predictive of recurrence. We specifically investigated invasive recurrence with respect to mode of detection of DCIS. Patients whose DCIS was detected outside of the NHS Breast Screening Programme have a higher risk of subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer than those whose DCIS is detected through screening. There is no significant difference in risk of subsequent contralateral invasive recurrence according to mode of detection.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; DCIS; NHSBSP (NHS breast screening programme); Radiotherapy; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25270228     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  8 in total

1.  Cancer incidence, mortality, and stage at diagnosis in First Nations living in Manitoba.

Authors:  K M Decker; E V Kliewer; A A Demers; K Fradette; N Biswanger; G Musto; B Elias; D Turner
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Linnea Langhans; Maj-Britt Jensen; Maj-Lis M Talman; Ilse Vejborg; Niels Kroman; Tove F Tvedskov
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Michael Schaapveld; Emiel J Rutgers; Marjanka K Schmidt; Linda de Munck; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  In situ breast cancer incidence patterns in Iceland and differences in ductal carcinoma in situ treatment compared to Sweden.

Authors:  Arnar S Agustsson; Helgi Birgisson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Thorvaldur Jonsson; Hrefna Stefansdottir; Fredrik Wärnberg; Mats Lambe; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Asgerdur Sverrisdottir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Christine Desmedt; Jelle Wesseling; Mathilde M M Almekinders; Michael Schaapveld; Bram Thijssen; Lindy L Visser; Tycho Bismeijer; Joyce Sanders; Edoardo Isnaldi; Ingrid Hofland; Marjolijn Mertz; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Annegien Broeks; Erik Hooijberg; Wilbert Zwart; Esther H Lips
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.

Authors:  Suzanne C Wetstein; Nikolas Stathonikos; Josien P W Pluim; Yujing J Heng; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Celien P H Vreuls; Paul J van Diest; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 7.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Biology, Biomarkers, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study.

Authors:  Gurdeep S Mannu; Zhe Wang; John Broggio; Jackie Charman; Shan Cheung; Olive Kearins; David Dodwell; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-05-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.