Literature DB >> 25269837

Human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection impact on (18)F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax, CT volumetric and KRAS-based parameters of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Claudio V Sole1, Felipe A Calvo, Carlos Ferrer, Emilio Alvarez, Jose L Carreras, Enrique Ochoa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It has long been debated whether human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are associated with rectal cancer. The gene products of HCMV and EBV contribute to cell-cycle progression, mutagenesis, angiogenesis and immune evasion. The aim of this prospective study was to analyse the association between infection of a tumour by HCMV and EBV and clinical, histological, metabolic ((18)F-FDG uptake), volumetric (from CT) and molecular (KRAS status) features and long-term outcomes in a homogeneously treated group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
METHODS: HCMV and EBV were detected in pretreatment biopsies using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore associations between viral infection and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: We analysed 37 patients with a median follow-up of 74 months (range 5-173 months). Locoregional control, OS and DFS at 5 years were 93%, 74% and 71%, respectively. Patients with HCMV/EBV coinfection had a significantly higher maximum standardized uptake value than patients without viral coinfection (p = 0.02). Significant differences were also observed in staging and percentage relative reduction in tumour volume between patients with and without HCMV infection (p < 0.01) and EBV infection (p < 0.01). KRAS wildtype status was significantly more frequently observed in patients with EBV infection (p <0.01) and HCMV/EBV co-infection (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in OS or DFS between patients with and without EBV infection (p = 0.88 and 0.73), HCMV infection (p = 0.84 and 0.79), and EBV/CMV coinfection (p = 0.24 and 0.39).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed that viral infections were associated with metabolic staging differences, and differences in the evolution of metabolic and volumetric parameters and KRAS mutations. Further findings of specific features will help determine the best candidates for metabolic and volumetric staging and restaging. Further toxicity profile findings will help to determine the best candidates for specific supportive treatment during pelvic chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25269837     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2910-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  30 in total

1.  Relationship between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation and KRAS/BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Yuji Nakamoto; Mayumi Kawada; Koya Hida; Takuya Matsumoto; Teppei Murakami; Suguru Hasegawa; Kaori Togashi; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Pearls and pitfalls in interpretation of abdominal and pelvic PET-CT.

Authors:  Michael A Blake; Ajay Singh; Bindu N Setty; James Slattery; Mannudeep Kalra; Michael M Maher; Dushyant V Sahani; Alan J Fischman; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-François Bosset; Laurence Collette; Gilles Calais; Laurent Mineur; Philippe Maingon; Ljiljana Radosevic-Jelic; Alain Daban; Etienne Bardet; Alexander Beny; Jean-Claude Ollier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Nomograms for predicting local recurrence, distant metastases, and overall survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of European randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vincenzo Valentini; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Guido Lammering; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Maria Cristina Barba; Marek Bebenek; Franck Bonnetain; Jean-Francois Bosset; Krzysztof Bujko; Luca Cionini; Jean-Pierre Gerard; Claus Rödel; Aldo Sainato; Rolf Sauer; Bruce D Minsky; Laurence Collette; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET parameters and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kai-Ping Chang; Ngan-Ming Tsang; Chun-Ta Liao; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Ming-Jui Chung; Chuan-Wei Lo; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Shu-Hang Ng; Hung-Ming Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Peter Martus; Thomas Papadoupolos; Laszlo Füzesi; Martin Klimpfinger; Rainer Fietkau; Torsten Liersch; Werner Hohenberger; Rudolf Raab; Rolf Sauer; Christian Wittekind
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake on PET CT and glucose transporter 1 expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ran Hong; Sung-Chul Lim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical prognostic factors in stage II/III colon cancer.

Authors:  Arnaud D Roth; Mauro Delorenzi; Sabine Tejpar; Pu Yan; Dirk Klingbiel; Roberto Fiocca; Giovanni d'Ario; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Bernard Nordlinger; Fred Bosman; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Epstein-Barr virus induces morphological and molecular changes in thyroid neoplastic cells.

Authors:  Jacqueline Fátima Martins Almeida; José Luiz Proenca-Modena; Natássia Elena Bufalo; Karina Colombera Peres; Elisângela de Souza Teixeira; Larissa Teodoro; Raíssa Marques Beck; Ana Paula Moraes; Alfio José Tincani; Clarice Weis Arns; Laura Sterian Ward
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Mechanisms underlying 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Masayoshi Iwamoto; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-28

Review 3.  Human Papillomaviruses and Epstein-Barr Virus Interactions in Colorectal Cancer: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Queenie Fernandes; Ishita Gupta; Semir Vranic; Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 4.  Epstein-Barr Virus in the Development of Colorectal Cancer (Review).

Authors:  N A Oleynikova; N V Danilova; M O Grimuta; P G Malkov
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2021-08-28

5.  Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of 18F-Flurodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Yin; Ming-Zhi Xie; Xin-Qiang Liang; Meng-Ling Ye; Ji-Lin Li; Bang-Li Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.