Literature DB >> 23104212

Integrated analysis of molecular and clinical prognostic factors in stage II/III colon cancer.

Arnaud D Roth1, Mauro Delorenzi, Sabine Tejpar, Pu Yan, Dirk Klingbiel, Roberto Fiocca, Giovanni d'Ario, Laura Cisar, Roberto Labianca, David Cunningham, Bernard Nordlinger, Fred Bosman, Eric Van Cutsem.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic potential of individual clinical and molecular parameters in stage II/III colon cancer has been investigated, but a thorough multivariable assessment of their relative impact is missing.
METHODS: Tumors from patients (N = 1404) in the PETACC3 adjuvant chemotherapy trial were examined for BRAF and KRAS mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI), chromosome 18q loss of heterozygosity (18qLOH), and SMAD4 expression. Their importance in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox regression models, and recursive partitioning trees. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: MSI-high status and SMAD4 focal loss of expression were identified as independent prognostic factors with better RFS (hazard ratio [HR] of recurrence = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.81, P = .003) and OS (HR of death = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.70, P = .001) for MSI-high status and worse RFS (HR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.81, P < .001) and OS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.01, P < .001) for SMAD4 loss. 18qLOH did not have any prognostic value in RFS or OS. Recursive partitioning identified refinements of TNM into new clinically interesting prognostic subgroups. Notably, T3N1 tumors with MSI-high status and retained SMAD4 expression had outcomes similar to stage II disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant assessment of molecular and clinical markers in multivariable analysis is essential to confirm or refute their independent prognostic value. Including molecular markers with independent prognostic value might allow more accurate prediction of prognosis than TNM staging alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23104212     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  90 in total

1.  Response.

Authors:  Chiara Cremolini; Fotios Loupakis; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Striking similarities in genetic aberrations between a rectal tumor and its lung recurrence.

Authors:  Osama E Rahma; Mauricio Burotto; Luisa Matos Do Canto; Alexandre A Germanos; Bassem R Haddad; John L Marshall
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-11-15

Review 3.  Advances in the management of colorectal cancer: from biology to treatment.

Authors:  Shahid Ahmed; Kate Johnson; Osama Ahmed; Nayyer Iqbal
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection impact on (18)F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax, CT volumetric and KRAS-based parameters of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Claudio V Sole; Felipe A Calvo; Carlos Ferrer; Emilio Alvarez; Jose L Carreras; Enrique Ochoa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Integrating biomarkers in colorectal cancer trials in the West and China.

Authors:  Sabine Tejpar; Lin Shen; Xicheng Wang; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Microsatellite instability testing and its role in the management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hisato Kawakami; Aziz Zaanan; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-07

Review 7.  What We Know About Stage II and III Colon Cancer: It's Still Not Enough.

Authors:  Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Wu Zhang; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Clinical significance of VEGFR-2 and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax pretreatment score in predicting the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Claudio V Sole; Felipe A Calvo; Emilio Alvarez; Isabel Peligros; Pilar Garcia-Alfonso; Carlos Ferrer; Enrique Ochoa; Rafael Herranz; Jose L Carreras
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Fabio Coppedè; Angela Lopomo; Roberto Spisni; Lucia Migliore
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  What is the optimal means of staging colon cancer?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Arena; Anton J Bilchik
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.