OBJECTIVES: ENT surgeons are facing an ever-increasing demand to demonstrate their efficacy. The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a fully validated and easy-to-use outcome measure in rhinology. Our goal was to translate and validate the SNOT-22 in a cohort of 422 French-speaking subjects. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The French version of the SNOT-22 was obtained by forward and backward translations by six independent interpreters. Five experienced rhinologists compared the translations to each other, and a group of 12 naive patients selected the most appropriate translation of each item. To evaluate this questionnaire, we conducted a prospective cohort study on 376 rhinological patients and 46 healthy volunteers in three University-affiliated teaching Hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility (test-retest reliability), internal consistency, known-group differences, responsiveness to treatment, validity and correlation to other clinical instruments (visual analogue scale, Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation score and Lund-Mackay score). RESULTS: The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.78, indicating a good reliability when administering the instrument on two different occasions. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's α value of 0.93. Our questionnaire was able to detect differences between rhinological patients and control subjects (P < 0.0001) and improved significantly after nose and sinus surgery (P < 0.0001), indicating a good responsiveness. There was a relative correlation with visual analogue scale and Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) score, but no correlation with Lund-Mackay score. CONCLUSION: The SNOT-22 is a reliable and valid tool to assess quality of life in French-speaking patients and correlates well with known indices of disease severity.
OBJECTIVES: ENT surgeons are facing an ever-increasing demand to demonstrate their efficacy. The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a fully validated and easy-to-use outcome measure in rhinology. Our goal was to translate and validate the SNOT-22 in a cohort of 422 French-speaking subjects. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The French version of the SNOT-22 was obtained by forward and backward translations by six independent interpreters. Five experienced rhinologists compared the translations to each other, and a group of 12 naive patients selected the most appropriate translation of each item. To evaluate this questionnaire, we conducted a prospective cohort study on 376 rhinological patients and 46 healthy volunteers in three University-affiliated teaching Hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility (test-retest reliability), internal consistency, known-group differences, responsiveness to treatment, validity and correlation to other clinical instruments (visual analogue scale, Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation score and Lund-Mackay score). RESULTS: The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.78, indicating a good reliability when administering the instrument on two different occasions. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's α value of 0.93. Our questionnaire was able to detect differences between rhinological patients and control subjects (P < 0.0001) and improved significantly after nose and sinus surgery (P < 0.0001), indicating a good responsiveness. There was a relative correlation with visual analogue scale and Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) score, but no correlation with Lund-Mackay score. CONCLUSION: The SNOT-22 is a reliable and valid tool to assess quality of life in French-speaking patients and correlates well with known indices of disease severity.
Authors: N Oker; V Dupuch; P Herman; N Leclerc; P Vironneau; H Dang; J Majer; R Pastourel; Y Pavier; J-P Blancal; N Saroul; T Mom; R Kania; E Vicaut; L Gilain; B Verillaud Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Jerome R Lechien; Anaïs Rameau; Lisa G De Marrez; Gautier Le Bosse; Karina Negro; Andra Sebestyen; Robin Baudouin; Sven Saussez; Stéphane Hans Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Francesco Mozzanica; A Preti; R Gera; S Gallo; C Bulgheroni; F Bandi; F Ottaviani; P Castelnuovo Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Jerome R Lechien; Pierre Cabaraux; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Mohamad Khalife; Stéphane Hans; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Delphine Martiny; Fabrice Journe; Leigh Sowerby; Sven Saussez Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Jerome R Lechien; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Stéphane Hans; Sven Saussez; Luigi A Vaira; Giacomo De Riu; Giovanni Cammaroto; Younes Chekkoury-Idrissi; Marta Circiu; Lea Distinguin; Fabrice Journe; Christophe de Terwangne; Shahram Machayekhi; Maria R Barillari; Christian Calvo-Henriquez Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-01-16 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Fatma Alanazy; Surayie Al Dousary; Ahmed Albosaily; Turki Aldriweesh; Saad Alsaleh; Turki Aldrees Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.526
Authors: Jerome R Lechien; Justin Michel; Claire Hopkins; Sven Saussez; Thomas Radulesco; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Luigi A Vaira; Giacomo De Riu; Leigh Sowerby Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 2.970