Literature DB >> 27535841

The validity and reliability of Thai Sinonasal Outcome Test-22.

Pawin Numthavaj1, Thongchai Bhongmakapat2, Boonsarm Roongpuwabaht3, Atiporn Ingsathit1, Ammarin Thakkinstian1.   

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) symptoms can significantly reduce quality of life. The Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) is frequently used to assess this disease-specific quality of life, although it has not been translated into Thai language. We translated the original SNOT-22 questionnaire to Thai using forward-backward technique, and validated it in CRS patients [n = 229, mean age of 52.6 (SD = 15.9)] recruited at outpatient Otolaryngology clinic, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. A construct validity was assessed using factor analysis, reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) after 3 days of taking the first questionnaire, and internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. A total of 201 out of 229 patients completed SNOT-22 questionnaire. Factor analysis with oblique rotation was applied and yielded three domains with eigenvalue of 1 or higher. These domains were named as nasal-related, ear-general-psychological, and sleep-related domains. Estimated ICC ranged from 0.49 to 0.71 with a median of 0.64, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.94. The Thai SNOT-22 questionnaire is reliable and valid with three domains. Thai SNOT-22 may be used in research and clinical practice to assess disease-specific quality of life and aid in management plan at CRS clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic rhinosinusitis; Outcome; Questionnaire; Reliability; Sinonasal Outcome Test; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27535841     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4234-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

Review 1.  A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?

Authors:  A D Morley; H R Sharp
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  [Quality of life survey on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis by using Chinese version of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22)].

Authors:  Wei Lü; Fang Qi; Zhi-Qiang Gao; Guo-Dong Feng; Xian-Dao Yuan; Xiao-Feng Jin
Journal:  Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2008-01

3.  The sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22: validation for Greek patients.

Authors:  Vasileios A Lachanas; Malamati Tsea; Stergiani Tsiouvaka; Jiannis K Hajiioannou; Charalampos E Skoulakis; John G Bizakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Clinimetric evaluation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16. Student Research Award 1998.

Authors:  E R Anderson; M P Murphy; E A Weymuller
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Martin Desrosiers; Gerald A Evans; Paul K Keith; Erin D Wright; Alan Kaplan; Jacques Bouchard; Anthony Ciavarella; Patrick W Doyle; Amin R Javer; Eric S Leith; Atreyi Mukherji; R Robert Schellenberg; Peter Small; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.406

6.  A multi-centre study on quality of life and absenteeism in patients with CRS referred for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  P Sahlstrand-Johnson; B Ohlsson; C Von Buchwald; M Jannert; Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: translation, cultural adaptation and validation in Portugal.

Authors:  D de Vilhena; D Duarte; G Lopes
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test.

Authors:  C Hopkins; S Gillett; R Slack; V J Lund; J P Browne
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.597

9.  The reliability and validity of the persian version of sinonasal outcome test 22 (snot 22) questionnaires.

Authors:  Maryam Jalessi; Mohammad Farhadi; Seyyed Kamran Kamrava; Ebrahim Amintehran; Alimohammad Asghari; Mohsen Rezaei Hemami; Alireza Mobasseri; Mohammadreza Masroorchehr
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

10.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT): 22 to Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Eduardo Macoto Kosugi; Vitor Guo Chen; Viviane Maria Guerreiro da Fonseca; Milena Martins Pellogia Cursino; José Arruda Mendes Neto; Luís Carlos Gregório
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct
View more
  3 in total

1.  Reliability and validity study of Sino-nasal outcome test 22 (Thai version) in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jate Lumyongsatien; Waralak Yangsakul; Chaweewan Bunnag; Claire Hopkins; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2017-12-29

2.  Validity and Reliability Study of Bahasa Malaysia Version of Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient.

Authors:  Ramli Ramiza Ramza; Zulkifli Shifa; Abdullah Baharudin; Mohamad Sakinah; Md Shukri Norasnieda
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

Authors:  Fatma Alanazy; Surayie Al Dousary; Ahmed Albosaily; Turki Aldriweesh; Saad Alsaleh; Turki Aldrees
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.