| Literature DB >> 25268616 |
Chun-Li Song1, Bin Liu2, Hong-Ying Diao3, Yong-Feng Shi4, Yang-Xue Li5, Ji-Chang Zhang6, Yang Lu7, Guan Wang8, Jia Liu9, Yun-Peng Yu10, Zi-Yuan Guo11, Jin-Peng Wang12, Zhuo Zhao13, Jian-Gen Liu14, Yi-Hang Liu5, Zhi-Xian Liu15, Dan Cai16, Qian Li17.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study investigated the role of microRNA-320 (miR-320) on left ventricular remodeling in the rat model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury, and we intended to explore the myocardial mechanism of miR-320-mediated myocardium protection. We collected 120 male Wistar rats (240-280 g) in this study and then randomly divided them into three groups: (1) sham surgery group (sham group: n=40); (2) ischemia-reperfusion model group (I/R group: n=40); and (3) I/R model with antagomir-320 group (I/R+antagomir-320 group: n=40). Value changes of heart function in transesophageal echocardiography were recorded at various time points (day 1, day 3, day 7, day 15 and day 30) after surgery in each group. Myocardial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and examined with optical microscope. The degree of myocardial fibrosis was assessed by Sirius Red staining. Terminal dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and qRT-PCR methods were used to measure the apoptosis rate and to determine the miR-320 expression levels in myocardial tissues. Transesophageal echocardiography showed that the values of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) and ±dp/dtmax in the I/R group were obviously lower than those in the sham group, while the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) value was higher than that in the sham group. The values of LVEF, LVFS, LVSP and ±dp/dtmax showed a gradual decrease in the I/R group, while the LVEDP value showed an up tendency along with the extension of reperfusion time. The H&E staining revealed that rat myocardial tissue in the I/R group presented extensive myocardial damage; for the I/R+antagomir-320 group, however, the degree of damage in myocardial cells was obviously better than that of the I/R group. The Sirius Red staining results showed that the degree of myocardial fibrosis in the I/R group was more severe along with the extension of the time of reperfusion. For the I/R+antagomir-320 group, the degree of myocardial fibrosis was less severe than that in the I/R group. Tissues samples in both the sham and I/R+antagomir-320 groups showed a lower apoptosis rate compared to I/R group. The qRT-PCR results indicated that miR-320 expression in the I/R group was significantly higher than that in both the sham and I/R+antagomir-320 groups. The expression level of miR-320 is significantly up-regulated in the rat model of myocardial I/R injury, and it may be implicated in the prevention of myocardial I/R injury-triggered left ventricular remodeling.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25268616 PMCID: PMC4227171 DOI: 10.3390/ijms151017442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Differences in cardiac function of three groups. LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; LVSP, left ventricular systolic pressure.
| day 1 | 83.5 ± 2.7 | 72.2 ± 2.4 * | 80.6 ± 2.9 # | 47.3 ± 4.2 | 36.3 ± 1.9 * | 42.6 ± 3.1 # | 128 ± 4 | 111 ± 8 * | 119 ± 7 # | |||||||||
| day 3 | 84.3 ± 2.7 | 63.2 ± 1.0 * | 77.2 ± 2.2 # | 47.9 ± 4.2 | 30.1 ± 1.2 * | 40.4 ± 3.3 # | 130 ± 8 | 100 ± 8 * | 111 ± 7 # | |||||||||
| day 7 | 85.3 ± 2.6 | 56.7 ± 1.1 * | 70.7 ± 2.5 # | 48.3 ± 4.5 | 25.5 ± 1.3 * | 35.26 ± 2.2 # | 131 ± 8 | 96 ± 8 * | 104 ± 7 # | |||||||||
| day 15 | 85.2 ± 2.5 | 52.6 ± 1.3 * | 64.7 ± 2.2 # | 48.2 ± 3.9 | 23.4 ± 1.0 * | 30.8 ± 2.1 # | 129 ± 7 | 92 ± 5 * | 100 ± 6 # | |||||||||
| day 30 | 84.7 ± 2.7 | 46.9 ± 1.1 * | 59.3 ± 2.1 # | 48.4 ± 3.5 | 21.2 ± 1.4 * | 29.7 ± 1.9 # | 128 ± 6 | 88 ± 7 * | 97 ± 6 # | |||||||||
| day 1 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 6.5 ± 1.1 * | 5.3 ± 0.9 # | 12,003 ± 789 | 9258 ± 753 * | 11,113 ± 719 # | 8367 ± 693 | 7442 ± 653 * | 8004 ± 598 # | |||||||||
| day 3 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 6.8 ± 0.7 * | 5.9 ± 0.9 # | 11,936 ± 823 | 8843 ± 672 * | 9656 ± 679 # | 8438 ± 703 | 6982 ± 637 * | 7689 ± 655 # | |||||||||
| day 7 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 7.1 ± 0.7 * | 6.8 ± 0.8 # | 12,538 ± 815 | 8121 ± 648 * | 9100 ± 772 # | 8257 ± 654 | 6478 ± 623 * | 7339 ± 641 # | |||||||||
| day 15 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | 7.8 ± 1.1 * | 7.1 ± 0.8 # | 12,784 ± 891 | 7934 ± 711 * | 8807 ± 707 # | 8354 ± 697 | 6002 ± 605 * | 6891 ± 646 # | |||||||||
| day 30 | 4.5 ± 0.7 | 8.9 ± 1.3 * | 7.9 ± 0.9 # | 12,034 ± 901 | 7453 ± 618 * | 7887 ± 710 # | 8369 ± 598 | 5840 ± 579 * | 6331 ± 622 # | |||||||||
1, the sham group; 2, the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) group; 3, the I/R + antagomir-320 group; * p < 0.05 compared with the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared with the I/R group.
Figure 1Myocardial cells of three groups at various time points.
Figure 2Degree of myocardial fibrosis of three groups at various time points.
Evaluation of the degree of myocardial fibrosis in three groups.
| Group | Degree of Myocardial Fibrosis (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Sham | 1.83 ± 0.47 | 1.64 ± 0.41 | 1.57 ± 0.37 | 1.64 ± 0.38 | 1.74 ± 0.35 |
| I/R | 2.03 ± 0.81 | 5.60 ± 2.30 * | 28.54 ± 7.12 * | 36.21 ± 7.50 | 37.54 ± 5.71 |
| I/R + antagomir-320 | 1.96 ± 0.66 | 4.68 ± 1.55 # | 19.42 ± 6.11 # | 25.10 ± 8.30 | 29.81 ± 6.86 |
* p < 0.05 compared with the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared with the I/R group.
Figure 3Detection of the apoptosis rate of myocardial cells by TUNEL staining.
The apoptosis rate of myocardial cells in three groups by terminal dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining.
| Group | Apoptosis Rate (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Sham | 5.6 ± 2.7 | 4.8 ± 2.4 | 5.4 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 2.2 | 6.4 ± 1.6 |
| I/R | 32.6 ± 5.4 * | 54.6 ± 7.3 * | 42.7 ± 6.8 * | 38.2 ± 7.5 * | 33.4 ± 5.3 * |
| I/R + antagomir-320 | 18.7 ± 3.3 # | 30.5 ± 6.4 # | 33.3 ± 8.7 # | 29.5 ± 8.7 # | 22.4 ± 4.8 # |
* p < 0.05 compared with the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared with the I/R group.
Expression of miR-320 in the myocardial tissue of three groups at five time points.
| Group | miR-320 (2−∆∆ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 15 | Day 30 | |
| Sham | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
| I/R | 0.60 ± 0.13 * | 0.52 ± 0.13 * | 0.63 ± 0.10 * | 0.76 ± 0.09 * | 0.72 ± 0.10 * |
| I/R + agomiR-133a | 0.86 ± 0.33 | 1.55 ± 0.14 # | 1.73 ± 0.27 # | 1.63 ± 0.11 # | 1.91 ± 0.95 # |
* p < 0.05 compared with the sham group; # p < 0.05 compared with the I/R group.