BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis is a hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a proposed substrate for arrhythmias and heart failure. In animal models, profibrotic genetic pathways are activated early, before hypertrophic remodeling. Data showing early profibrotic responses to sarcomere-gene mutations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are lacking. METHODS: We used echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and serum biomarkers of collagen metabolism, hemodynamic stress, and myocardial injury to evaluate subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a confirmed genotype. RESULTS: The study involved 38 subjects with pathogenic sarcomere mutations and overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 39 subjects with mutations but no left ventricular hypertrophy, and 30 controls who did not have mutations. Levels of serum C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) were significantly higher in mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy and in subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy than in controls (31% and 69% higher, respectively; P<0.001). The ratio of PICP to C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen was increased only in subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, suggesting that collagen synthesis exceeds degradation. Cardiac MRI studies showed late gadolinium enhancement, indicating myocardial fibrosis, in 71% of subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but in none of the mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of serum PICP indicated increased myocardial collagen synthesis in sarcomere-mutation carriers without overt disease. This profibrotic state preceded the development of left ventricular hypertrophy or fibrosis visible on MRI. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.)
BACKGROUND:Myocardial fibrosis is a hallmark of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a proposed substrate for arrhythmias and heart failure. In animal models, profibrotic genetic pathways are activated early, before hypertrophic remodeling. Data showing early profibrotic responses to sarcomere-gene mutations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are lacking. METHODS: We used echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and serum biomarkers of collagen metabolism, hemodynamic stress, and myocardial injury to evaluate subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and a confirmed genotype. RESULTS: The study involved 38 subjects with pathogenic sarcomere mutations and overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 39 subjects with mutations but no left ventricular hypertrophy, and 30 controls who did not have mutations. Levels of serum C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP) were significantly higher in mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy and in subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy than in controls (31% and 69% higher, respectively; P<0.001). The ratio of PICP to C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen was increased only in subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, suggesting that collagen synthesis exceeds degradation. Cardiac MRI studies showed late gadolinium enhancement, indicating myocardial fibrosis, in 71% of subjects with overt hypertrophic cardiomyopathy but in none of the mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of serum PICP indicated increased myocardial collagen synthesis in sarcomere-mutation carriers without overt disease. This profibrotic state preceded the development of left ventricular hypertrophy or fibrosis visible on MRI. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.)
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: H Niimura; L L Bachinski; S Sangwatanaroj; H Watkins; A E Chudley; W McKenna; A Kristinsson; R Roberts; M Sole; B J Maron; J G Seidman; C E Seidman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-04-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J C Moon; J Mogensen; P M Elliott; G C Smith; A G Elkington; S K Prasad; D J Pennell; W J McKenna Journal: Heart Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: G Klappacher; P Franzen; D Haab; M Mehrabi; M Binder; K Plesch; R Pacher; M Grimm; I Pribill; H G Eichler Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1995-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: A A Geisterfer-Lowrance; M Christe; D A Conner; J S Ingwall; F J Schoen; C E Seidman; J G Seidman Journal: Science Date: 1996-05-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Vasile I Pavlov; Laura R La Bonte; William M Baldwin; Maciej M Markiewski; John D Lambris; Gregory L Stahl Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Megan L McCain; Hongyan Yuan; Francesco S Pasqualini; Patrick H Campbell; Kevin Kit Parker Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Dylan J Richards; Yang Li; Charles M Kerr; Jenny Yao; Gyda C Beeson; Robert C Coyle; Xun Chen; Jia Jia; Brooke Damon; Robert Wilson; E Starr Hazard; Gary Hardiman; Donald R Menick; Craig C Beeson; Hai Yao; Tong Ye; Ying Mei Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 25.671