Literature DB >> 25268304

Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.

Cristiano Spada1, Jaap Stoker2, Onofre Alarcon3, Federico Barbaro1, Davide Bellini4, Michael Bretthauer5, Margriet C De Haan2, Jean-Marc Dumonceau6, Monika Ferlitsch7, Steve Halligan8, Emma Helbren8, Mikael Hellstrom9, Ernst J Kuipers10, Philippe Lefere11, Thomas Mang12, Emanuele Neri13, Lucio Petruzziello1, Andrew Plumb8, Daniele Regge14, Stuart A Taylor8, Cesare Hassan1, Andrea Laghi4.   

Abstract

This is an official guideline of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR). It addresses the clinical indications for the use of computed tomographic colonography (CTC). A targeted literature search was performed to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of CTC. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was adopted to define the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. Main recommendations 1 ESGE/ESGAR recommend computed tomographic colonography (CTC) as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend barium enema in this setting (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 2 ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC, preferably the same or next day, if colonoscopy is incomplete. Delay of CTC should be considered following endoscopic resection. In the case of obstructing colorectal cancer, preoperative contrast-enhanced CTC may also allow location or staging of malignant lesions (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 When endoscopy is contraindicated or not possible, ESGE/ESGAR recommend CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 4 ESGE/ESGAR recommend referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp  ≥  6  mm in diameter detected at CTC. CTC surveillance may be clinically considered if patients do not undergo polypectomy (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 5 ESGE/ESGAR do not recommend CTC as a primary test for population screening or in individuals with a positive first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it may be proposed as a CRC screening test on an individual basis providing the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits, and risks (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25268304     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1378092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  11 in total

1.  Evolution of Screen-Detected Small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-Year Surveillance Interval: Assessment of Growth With CT Colonography Compared With Histopathology.

Authors:  Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius; Thierry N Boellaard; Margriet C de Haan; C Yung Nio; Maarten G J Thomeer; Shandra Bipat; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Advances in the study of Lynch syndrome in China.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Lu; Jian-Qiu Sheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Editorial on the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline on clinical indications for CT colonography in the colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi; Emanuele Neri; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Review: capsule colonoscopy-a concise clinical overview of current status.

Authors:  Diana E Yung; Emanuele Rondonotti; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Consequences of CT colonography in stenosing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J F Huisman; L W Leicher; E de Boer; H L van Westreenen; J W de Groot; F A Holman; P C van de Meeberg; Pejm Sallevelt; Kcmj Peeters; Mnjm Wasser; Hfa Vasen; W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; William M Grady; David Lieberman; Thomas Seufferlein; Joseph J Sung; Petra G Boelens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Ultrasound virtual endoscopy: Polyp detection and reliability of measurement in an in vitro study with pig intestine specimens.

Authors:  Jin-Ya Liu; Li-Da Chen; Hua-Song Cai; Jin-Yu Liang; Ming Xu; Yang Huang; Wei Li; Shi-Ting Feng; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Program: current perspectives on strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Sara Koo; Laura Jane Neilson; Christian Von Wagner; Colin John Rees
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Appearances of screen-detected versus symptomatic colorectal cancers at CT colonography.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Fiona Pathiraja; Claire Nickerson; Katherine Wooldrage; David Burling; Stuart A Taylor; Wendy S Atkin; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Alex Ghanouni; Colin J Rees; Paul Hewitson; Claire Nickerson; Suzanne Wright; Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.