Literature DB >> 25863970

Editorial on the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline on clinical indications for CT colonography in the colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Andrea Laghi1, Emanuele Neri2, Daniele Regge3.   

Abstract

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE)-European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline was generated jointly by a team of researchers, including gastrointestinal radiologists and endoscopists, and represents the first full collaborative effort between the two specialties after years of turf battles involving CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy (CS). This guideline has a main educational purpose and it represents the attempt to find a consensus about the use of CTC in clinical practice based on the best current available evidence. Thus, it should not be considered as rules for establishing a legal standard of care. Main recommendations include the use of CTC as the radiological examination of choice for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, the use of CTC in the case of incomplete CS, and the possible use of CTC as an acceptable and equally sensitive alternative for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (CRC), when CS is contraindicated or not possible. ESGE-ESGAR guideline does not recommend CTC for population screening, but considers that CTC may be proposed as a CRC screening test on an individual basis (opportunistic screening) provided the screenee is adequately informed about test characteristics, benefits and risks. With regard to patient management, referral for endoscopic polypectomy in patients with at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm in diameter detected at CTC is recommended, considering surveillance only in case polyp removal is not possible. Knowledge about CTC is in continuous evolution and this means that a revision might be necessary in the future as new data appear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT colonography, guideline; CT colonography, indications; Computed tomography colonography; Virtual colonoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863970     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-015-0537-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  20 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  C Hassan; P J Pickhardt; D H Kim; E Di Giulio; A Zullo; A Laghi; A Repici; F Iafrate; J Osborn; B Annibale
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kevin J Chang; Satinder S Rekhi; Stephan W Anderson; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther M Stoop; Margriet C de Haan; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; C Yung Nio; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Maarten Thomeer; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Jaap Stoker; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  CT colonography versus double-contrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Lorenzo Faggioni; Francesca Cerri; Francesca Turini; Simone Angeli; Lorenzo Cini; Franco Perrone; Fabio Paolicchi; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-09-24

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniele Regge; Cristiana Laudi; Giovanni Galatola; Patrizia Della Monica; Luigina Bonelli; Giuseppe Angelelli; Roberto Asnaghi; Brunella Barbaro; Carlo Bartolozzi; Didier Bielen; Luca Boni; Claudia Borghi; Paolo Bruzzi; Maria Carla Cassinis; Massimo Galia; Teresa Maria Gallo; Andrea Grasso; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi; Maria Cristina Martina; Emanuele Neri; Carlo Senore; Giovanni Simonetti; Silvia Venturini; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicolle M Gatto; Harold Frucht; Vijaya Sundararajan; Judith S Jacobson; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists.

Authors:  F Radaelli; G Meucci; G Minoli
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.088

8.  Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Edward Dadswell; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Steve Halligan; Kate Wooldrage; Edward Dadswell; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Emanuele Neri; Steve Halligan; Mikael Hellström; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Daniele Regge; Jaap Stoker; Stuart Taylor; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.