| Literature DB >> 25265043 |
Emma Harris1, Mark Rakobowchuk2, Karen M Birch1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The improvement of vascular health in the exercising limb can be attained by sprint interval training (SIT). However, the effects on systemic vascular function and on circulating angiogenic cells (CACs) which may contribute to endothelial repair have not been investigated. Additionally, a comparison between SIT and sprint continuous training (SCT) which is less time committing has not been made.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25265043 PMCID: PMC4181657 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Enumeration of CACs.
ISHAGE gating strategy for CAC enumeration. Cells positive for CD45 and therefore leukocytes were gated in R1. Cells in R1 that were positive for CD34 and had low side scatter characteristics were plotted in R2 and defined as CD34+ cells. Cells from R2 were gated on a further plot to determine the CD45dim population. Subsequently cells from R3 were back-gated from R4 and gated on a further plot (R5) to define CD34+CD45dim cells that are located within the lymphocyte population.
Participant characteristics at pre and post 4 weeks of either sprint interval (SIT) or sprint continuous training (SCT).
| SIT (n = 6) | SCT (n = 6) | |||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
| Body mass index (kg·m−2) | 23.6±1.8 | 23.8±1.6 | 23.1±2.3 | 22.9±2.6 |
| Resting heart rate (bpm) | 55±10 | 56±6 | 62±8 | 64±12 |
| Brachial artery SBP | 115±7 | 117±11 | 112±12 | 111±11 |
| Brachial artery DBP | 73±5 | 72±11 | 76±9 | 72±7 |
| Brachial artery MAP | 87±5 | 87±10 | 88±10 | 85±8 |
| Absolute | 2.34±0.37 | 2.55±0.31 | 2.24±0.22 | 2.30±0.21 |
| RI test duration (min) | 12.14±1.74 | 13.44±1.55 | 12.06±1.18 | 12.73±0.9 |
| Lactate threshold (%) | 48.4±7.4 | 46.4±5.4 | 49.0±6.4 | 51.9±8.1 |
| Peak reactive hyperaemia (cm·s−1) | 98.8±23.6 | 97.3±19.4 | 82.0±14.7 | 90.1±8.7 |
| Peak shear rate (s−1) | 2629±1064 | 2564±803 | 2126±449 | 2395±301 |
| AUCpeak (a.u.) | 31325±11174 | 30406±13875 | 27646±6595 | 31396±6366 |
| AUC60 (a.u.) | 39815±14654 | 39648±16146 | 39596±5261 | 43901±6012 |
| Insonation angle (°) | 69±1 | 68±2 | 68±2 | 68±1 |
| Brachial artery baseline diameter (mm) | 3.2±0.8 | 3.2±0.8 | 3.1±0.5 | 3.1±0.5 |
| Absolute FMD (mm) | 0.15±0.09 | 0.18±0.07 | 0.22±0.08 | 0.20±0.08 |
| Time from cuff release to peak diameter (s) | 38±8 | 35±4 | 34±9 | 34±6 |
| CAC adhesion per microscopic image (SIT: n = 6; SCT: n = 5) | 11±8 | 8±6 | 13±8 | 11±12 |
| CAC migration per 10 microscopic images (SIT: n = 5; SCT: n = 5) | 2±3 | 4±7 | 1±4 | 2±2 |
* indicates a significant main time effect (p<0.05).
No group differences at baseline or group x time interactions were observed (p>0.05). Absolute FMD group x time interaction was close to significant (p = 0.08). RI test duration group x time interaction was close to significant (p = 0.05). Bpm = beats per minute, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, MAP = mean arterial pressure, = maximal oxygen uptake, RI = ramp incremental, AUC = area under the shear rate curve, FMD = flow-mediated dilation and CAC = circulating angiogenic cell.
Figure 2Cardio-respiratory fitness.
* indicates a significant pre to post-training difference in both groups (time effect p<0.05). a) Relative maximal oxygen uptake () increased following both SIT (n = 6) and SCT (n = 6; main time effect p = 0.046) with no group x time interaction (p = 0.49). b) The estimated lactate threshold (LT) followed a trend to increase in both training groups (main time effect p = 0.08) with no group x time interaction (p = 0.30). c) The ramp incremental (RI) test work-rate peak (WRpeak) significantly increased in both groups (main time effect p = 0.0001) with a greater increase following SIT (group x time interaction p = 0.05).
Figure 3Brachial artery endothelial function.
Brachial artery FMD displayed a trend for an increase following SIT (n = 6) but no change following SCT (n = 6; main time effect p = 0.81; group x time interaction p = 0.08).
Arterial stiffness pre and post either sprint interval (SIT) or sprint continuous training (SCT).
| SIT (n = 6) | SCT (n = 6) | |||
| PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
| PWVcr (m·s−1) | 6.0±0.8 | 6.2±0.5 | 6.6±0.8 | 7.4±0.7 |
| PWVbf (m·s−1) | 7.4±0.9 | 7.8±1.4 | 8.2±1.6 | 7.4±1.1 |
| Carotid artery IMT (mm) | 0.31±0.10 | 0.36±0.07 | 0.33±0.09 | 0.35±0.06 |
| Carotid artery PP (mmHg) | 29±4 | 31±5 | 25±3 | 27±5 |
| Carotid ΔCSA within heart cycle (mm2) | 6.2±1.3 | 6.0±0.7 | 6.2±1.5 | 6.2±1.5 |
| Carotid artery CSC (mm2/mmHg) | 0.22±0.05 | 0.19±0.03 | 0.25±0.06 | 0.24±0.08 |
| Carotid artery DD (mm/mmHg) | 0.01±0.002 | 0.01±0.002 | 0.01±0.002 | 0.01±0.002 |
| Carotid artery SI (a.u.) | 3.3±0.8 | 3.6±0.8 | 3.0±0.6 | 3.4±1.2 |
No group differences at pre-training, training effects or group x time interactions were found (p>0.05). PWVcr = carotid-radial pulse wave velocity, PWVbf = brachial-foot pulse wave velocity, IMT = intima-media thickness, PP = pulse pressure, CSA = cross-sectional area, CSC = cross-sectional compliance, DD = distensibilty, SI = β-stiffness index.
Figure 4Circulating angiogenic cells.
* indicates a significant pre to post-training difference in both groups (time effect p<0.05). a) CD34+ cells increased following both SIT (n = 6) and SCT (n = 5; main time effect p = 0.02) with no group x time interaction (p = 0.83). However, b) CD34+/CD45dim cells did not change following either type of training (main time effect p = 0.21; group x time interaction p = 0.67).