Literature DB >> 2017978

Determination of pulse wave velocities with computerized algorithms.

Y C Chiu1, P W Arand, S G Shroff, T Feldman, J D Carroll.   

Abstract

Careful determination of pulse wave velocity is important in the study of arterial viscoelastic properties, wave reflections, and ventricular-arterial interactions. In spite of its increasingly widespread use, there is as yet no standardized method for its determination. Most studies have manually identified the transit time of the pressure wave front as it travels over a known distance in the arterial system, but the issues of accuracy and reproducibility have not been addressed. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of four computerized algorithms in the determination of pulse wave velocities in invasive as well as in noninvasive pressure determinations. The four methods were the identification of: (1) the point of minimum diastolic pressure, (2) the point at which the first derivative of pressure is maximum, (3) the point at which the second derivative of pressure is maximum, and (4) the point yielded by the intersection of a line tangent to the initial systolic upstroke of the pressure tracing and a horizontal line through the minimum point. High-fidelity aortic pressure recordings were obtained in 26 patients with a multi-sensor micromanometer catheter. Noninvasive brachial and radial pressure waveforms were recorded in 11 volunteers with external piezoelectric transducers. The results show that the first derivative method consistently provided results that were different from the other methods for both the invasive and noninvasive methods because of changes in the structure of the upstroke as the arterial pulse propagates distally. Although the minimum method worked well for the invasive determinations, it was erratic with the noninvasive determinations, probably because of the higher amount of noise and reflection in the latter. Among the four algorithms, the second derivative and the intersecting tangents methods worked well with both invasive and noninvasive determinations with mean variation coefficients of less than 7% and correlation coefficients between the methods of greater than 0.90 for all data. In conclusion, computerized algorithms allow accurate determination of pulse wave velocity in invasively and noninvasively measured arterial pressure waveforms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017978     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90153-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  64 in total

1.  Comparison of the acute impact of maximal arm and leg aerobic exercise on arterial stiffness.

Authors:  S M Ranadive; C A Fahs; H Yan; L M Rossow; S Agiovlasitis; B Fernhall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effects of ramipril in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease: results of a pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Whitney Wharton; James H Stein; Claudia Korcarz; Jane Sachs; Sandra R Olson; Henrik Zetterberg; Maritza Dowling; Shuyun Ye; Carey E Gleason; Gail Underbakke; Laura E Jacobson; Sterling C Johnson; Mark A Sager; Sanjay Asthana; Cynthia M Carlsson
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Effect of single-leg resistance exercise on regional arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Kevin S Heffernan; Lindy Rossow; Sae Young Jae; Halidu G Shokunbi; Elizabeth M Gibson; Bo Fernhall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Change in pulse transit time and pre-ejection period during head-up tilt-induced progressive central hypovolaemia.

Authors:  Gregory S H Chan; Paul M Middleton; Branko G Celler; Lu Wang; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Noninvasive pulmonary artery pressure monitoring by EIT: a model-based feasibility study.

Authors:  Martin Proença; Fabian Braun; Josep Solà; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Mathieu Lemay
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  In Vitro Validation of 4D Flow MRI for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation.

Authors:  Timothy Ruesink; Rafael Medero; David Rutkowski; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.495

7.  Alteration of proximal aorta biophysical properties in patients with end stage renal disease.

Authors:  A P Patrianakos; D Karakitsos; D N Karakitsos; E de Groot; F I Parthenakis; E K Daphnis; P E Vardas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Assessing the Stability of Aortic Aneurysms with Pulse Wave Imaging.

Authors:  Sacha D Nandlall; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Material property estimation for tubes and arteries using ultrasound radiation force and analysis of propagating modes.

Authors:  Miguel Bernal; Ivan Nenadic; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Inferring cerebrovascular changes from latencies of systemic and intracranial pulses: a model-based latency subtraction algorithm.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Andrew W Subudhi; Peng Xu; Shadnaz Asgari; Robert C Roach; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.