Literature DB >> 25264986

Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.

Mete Güler1, Şemsettin Bilak, Burak Bilgin, Ali Şimşek, Musa Çapkin, Ali Hakim Reyhan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by Icare PRO rebound tonometer (RT), Tomey FT-1000 noncontact tonometer (NCT), and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in healthy subjects, and to investigate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements.
METHODS: A total of 132 eyes of 66 healthy subjects were included in the study. All IOP measurements were applied in a sitting position and always in the same order (RT, NCT, and GAT). CCT was measured by noncontact anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: The mean CCT was 523.5±31.2 μm. The mean IOPs with GAT, NCT, and RT measurements were 14.56±2.77, 13.42±2.99, 14.18±2.55 mm Hg, respectively. A significantly good agreement was found between RT and GAT measurements (P=0.515). The mean difference between RT and GAT measurements was -0.38 mm Hg. An underestimation was found in NCT measurements compared with GAT ones as defined from paired comparisons (P=0.003). The mean difference between NCT and GAT measurements was -1.14 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between NCT and RT readings (P=0.069). The mean difference between NCT and RT measurements was -0.76 mm Hg. There was a significant correlation between GAT-NCT (r=0.740, P<0.001), GAT-RT (r=0.743, P<0.001), NCT-RT (r=0.729, P<0.001) measurement methods. The increment in measured IOP for a 10 μm increase in CCT was 0.16, 0.33, and 0.18 mm Hg for the GAT, NCT, and RT, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The IOP readings with the new Icare PRO RT showed good correlation with those obtained by GAT. Tomey FT-1000 NCT underestimated the IOP compared with GAT.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25264986     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Yoshitake Kato; Shunsuke Nakakura; Naoko Matsuo; Kayo Yoshitomi; Marina Handa; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  24-h intraocular pressure patterns measured by Icare PRO rebound in habitual position of open-angle glaucoma eyes.

Authors:  Zhaobin Fang; Xiaolei Wang; Siyu Qiu; Xinghuai Sun; Yuhong Chen; Ming Xiao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A Comparison of Applanation and Rebound Tonometers in Young Chicks.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.424

5.  Long-Term Observation of Coexistence of Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy, Resultant High Myopia and Nonkeratoconic Developing Corneal Astigmatism: A Case Report of 7-Year Tracking in a Chinese Boy.

Authors:  Jianqin Shen; Du Chixin; Yangshun Gu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.

Authors:  Min Chen; Lina Zhang; Jia Xu; Xinyi Chen; Yuxiang Gu; Yuping Ren; Kaijun Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Short-Term Effects of Different Types of Anti-Glaucoma Eyedrop on the Sclero-Conjunctival Vasculature Assessed Using Anterior Segment OCTA in Normal Human Eyes: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Tadamichi Akagi; Yoko Okamoto; Takanori Kameda; Kenji Suda; Hideo Nakanishi; Masahiro Miyake; Hanako Ohashi Ikeda; Tatsuya Yamada; Shin Kadomoto; Akihito Uji; Akitaka Tsujikawa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Shunsuke Nakakura; Ryo Asaoka; Etsuko Terao; Yuki Nagata; Yasuko Fukuma; Satomi Oogi; Miku Shiraishi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 9.  Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use.

Authors:  Shunsuke Nakakura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.