Literature DB >> 25264213

The sensitivity of acoustic cough recording relative to intraesophageal pressure recording and patient report during reflux testing.

R Rosen1, J Amirault, N Heinz, H Litman, U Khatwa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the primary indications for reflux testing with multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (pH-MII) is to correlate reflux events with symptoms such as cough. Adult and pediatric studies have shown, using cough as a model, that patient report of symptoms is inaccurate. Unfortunately, intraesophageal pressure recording (IEPR) to record coughs is more invasive which limits its utility in children. The primary aim of this study was to validate the use of acoustic cough recording (ACR) during pH-MII testing.
METHODS: We recruited children undergoing pH-MII testing for the evaluation of cough. We simultaneously placed IEPR and pH-MII catheters and an ACR device in each patient. Each 24 h ACR, pH-MII, and IEPR tracing was scored by blinded investigators. Sensitivities for each method of symptom recording were calculated. KEY
RESULTS: A total of 2698 coughs were detected; 1140 were patient reported PR, 2425 were IEPR detected, and 2400 were ACR detected. The sensitivity of PR relative to ACR was 45.9% and the sensitivity of IEPR relative to ACR was 93.6%. There was strong inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.78) for the identification of cough by ACR. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Acoustic recording is a non-invasive, sensitive method of recording cough during pH-MII testing that is well suited for the pediatric population.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cough; gastroesophageal reflux; impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25264213      PMCID: PMC4446988          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  21 in total

1.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data.

Authors:  B L Weusten; J M Roelofs; L M Akkermans; G P Van Berge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.

Authors:  C D Rudolph; L J Mazur; G S Liptak; R D Baker; J T Boyle; R B Colletti; W T Gerson; S L Werlin
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and cough in children with chronic unexplained cough using combined impedance-pH-manometry recordings.

Authors:  K Blondeau; V Mertens; L Dupont; A Pauwels; R Farré; A Malfroot; E De Wachter; I De Schutter; B Hauser; Y Vandenplas; D Sifrim
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2010-10-22

5.  Acoustic cough-reflux associations in chronic cough: potential triggers and mechanisms.

Authors:  Jaclyn A Smith; Samantha Decalmer; Angela Kelsall; Kevin McGuinness; Helen Jones; Simon Galloway; Ashley Woodcock; Lesley A Houghton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The importance of multichannel intraluminal impedance in the evaluation of children with persistent respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Samuel Nurko
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Symptom reports are not reliable during ambulatory reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Robert T Kavitt; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Dilan Patel; Elif Saritas Yuksel; Zurabi Lominadze; Anas Abou-Ismail; Trisha Pasricha; C Gaelyn Garrett; David Hagaman; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  The acoustic cough monitoring and manometric profile of cough and throat clearing.

Authors:  Y Xiao; D Carson; L Boris; J Mabary; Z Lin; F Nicodème; M Cuttica; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Intraesophageal pressure recording improves the detection of cough during multichannel intraluminal impedance testing in children.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Janine Amirault; Emily Giligan; Umakanth Khatwa; Samuel Nurko
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  The symptom sensitivity index: a valuable additional parameter in 24-hour esophageal pH recording.

Authors:  R Breumelhof; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Prevalence of Rome IV Nonerosive Esophageal Phenotypes in Children.

Authors:  Lisa B Mahoney; Samuel Nurko; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Karthik Ravi; David A Katzka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Symptom Association: An Imperfect Pairing.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 23.059

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.