BACKGROUND: One of the primary reasons for referral for reflux testing is to correlate reflux events with symptoms such as cough. Adult studies have suggested that symptom recording is flawed and pediatricians feel this is an even more significant problem because there may be errors in both parental and patient reports. We hypothesize that intraesophageal pressure recording (IEPR) provides an objective method to identify coughs during reflux testing in children. METHODS: We recruited 20 children undergoing multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (pH-MII) testing for the evaluation of cough. We placed simultaneous intraesophageal pressure and pH-MII catheters. Tracings were blindly scored by 2 observers without knowledge of patient/parent symptom report. After the blinded scoring, patient/parent report of symptoms was recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of all coughs were detected by IEPR and only 48% of all coughs were reported by patients/parents. The mean time from the IEPR cough to the patient/parent cough was 11±16 seconds. Using IEPR as the criterion standard for the detection of cough, the sensitivity of patient report for the detection of cough is 46%. Using varying symptom windows because of the increased precision of IEPR, the number of patients with a positive symptom index could be reduced from 30% to 0%, preventing children from being falsely categorized as having reflux-related lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: Parental and patient symptom recording in children is inadequate for making the diagnosis of reflux-related lung disease. If patients undergo pH-MII testing for reflux-related cough, IEPR should become the new standard by which to correlate reflux with cough.
BACKGROUND: One of the primary reasons for referral for reflux testing is to correlate reflux events with symptoms such as cough. Adult studies have suggested that symptom recording is flawed and pediatricians feel this is an even more significant problem because there may be errors in both parental and patient reports. We hypothesize that intraesophageal pressure recording (IEPR) provides an objective method to identify coughs during reflux testing in children. METHODS: We recruited 20 children undergoing multichannel intraluminal impedance with pH (pH-MII) testing for the evaluation of cough. We placed simultaneous intraesophageal pressure and pH-MII catheters. Tracings were blindly scored by 2 observers without knowledge of patient/parent symptom report. After the blinded scoring, patient/parent report of symptoms was recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of all coughs were detected by IEPR and only 48% of all coughs were reported by patients/parents. The mean time from the IEPR cough to the patient/parent cough was 11±16 seconds. Using IEPR as the criterion standard for the detection of cough, the sensitivity of patient report for the detection of cough is 46%. Using varying symptom windows because of the increased precision of IEPR, the number of patients with a positive symptom index could be reduced from 30% to 0%, preventing children from being falsely categorized as having reflux-related lung disease. CONCLUSIONS: Parental and patient symptom recording in children is inadequate for making the diagnosis of reflux-related lung disease. If patients undergo pH-MII testing for reflux-related cough, IEPR should become the new standard by which to correlate reflux with cough.
Authors: David O Francis; Marion Goutte; James C Slaughter; C Gaelyn Garrett; David Hagaman; Michael D Holzman; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Janet T Holbrook; Robert A Wise; Benjamin D Gold; Kathryn Blake; Ellen D Brown; Mario Castro; Allen J Dozor; John J Lima; John G Mastronarde; Marianna M Sockrider; W Gerald Teague Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John G Mastronarde; Nicholas R Anthonisen; Mario Castro; Janet T Holbrook; Frank T Leone; W Gerald Teague; Robert A Wise Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Blondeau; V Mertens; L Dupont; A Pauwels; R Farré; A Malfroot; E De Wachter; I De Schutter; B Hauser; Y Vandenplas; D Sifrim Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2010-10-22
Authors: Jason Swoger; Jeff Ponsky; Douglas M Hicks; Joel E Richter; Tom I Abelson; Claudio Milstein; Mohammed A Qadeer; Michael F Vaezi Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Anne B Chang; John J Oppenheimer; Peter J Kahrilas; Ahmad Kantar; Bruce K Rubin; Miles Weinberger; Richard S Irwin Journal: Chest Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Daniel R Duncan; Janine Amirault; Nikki Johnston; Paul Mitchell; Kara Larson; Rachel L Rosen Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Floor W T Vergouwe; Michiel P van Wijk; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; René M H Wijnen; Johannes M Schnater; Hanneke IJsselstijn Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.839