Literature DB >> 25263963

Scientific assessment of animal welfare.

P H Hemsworth1, D J Mellor, G M Cronin, A J Tilbrook.   

Abstract

Animal welfare is a state within the animal and a scientific perspective provides methodologies for evidence-based assessment of an animal's welfare. A simplistic definition of animal welfare might be how the animal feels now. Affective experiences including emotions, are subjective states so cannot be measured directly in animals, but there are informative indirect physiological and behavioural indices that can be cautiously used to interpret such experiences. This review enunciates several key science-based frameworks for understanding animal welfare. The biological functioning and affective state frameworks were initially seen as competing, but a recent more unified approach is that biological functioning is taken to include affective experiences and affective experiences are recognised as products of biological functioning, and knowledge of the dynamic interactions between the two is considered to be fundamental to managing and improving animal welfare. The value of these two frameworks in understanding the welfare of group-housed sows is reviewed. The majority of studies of the welfare of group-housed sows have employed the biological functioning framework to infer compromised sow welfare, on the basis that suboptimal biological functioning accompanies negative affective states such as sow hunger, pain, fear, helplessness, frustration and anger. Group housing facilitates social living, but group housing of gestating sows raises different welfare considerations to stall housing, such as high levels of aggression, injuries and stress, at least for several days after mixing, as well as subordinate sows being underfed due to competition at feeding. This paper highlights the challenges and potential opportunities for the continued improvement in sow management through well-focused research and multidisciplinary assessment of animal welfare. In future the management of sentient animals will require the promotion of positive affective experiences in animals and this is likely to be a major focus for animal welfare science activity in the early twenty-first century.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal welfare; animal ethics; assessment; behaviour; emotions; sow welfare; stress

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263963     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2014.966167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  35 in total

1.  Analysis of the indoor environment of agricultural constructions in the context of sustainability.

Authors:  Jozef Švajlenka; Mária Kozlovská; Terézia Pošiváková
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  A Retrospective Literature Evaluation of the Integration of Stress Physiology Indices, Animal Welfare and Climate Change Assessment of Livestock.

Authors:  Edward Narayan; Michelle Barreto; Georgia-Constantina Hantzopoulou; Alan Tilbrook
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  How Japanese companion dog and cat owners' degree of attachment relates to the attribution of emotions to their animals.

Authors:  Bingtao Su; Naoko Koda; Pim Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Environmental Enrichment for Sucker and Weaner Pigs: The Effect of Enrichment Block Shape on the Behavioural Interaction by Pigs with the Blocks.

Authors:  Jade A Winfield; Greg F Macnamara; Ben L F Macnamara; Evelyn J S Hall; Cameron R Ralph; Cormac J O'Shea; Greg M Cronin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model.

Authors:  Katherine E Littlewood; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  'More than a feeling': An empirical investigation of hedonistic accounts of animal welfare.

Authors:  Jesse Robbins; Becca Franks; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intermittent Suckling Causes a Transient Increase in Cortisol That Does Not Appear to Compromise Selected Measures of Piglet Welfare and Stress.

Authors:  Diana L Turpin; Pieter Langendijk; Tai-Yuan Chen; David Lines; John R Pluske
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.