Literature DB >> 25263805

Convection enhanced delivery of carmustine to the murine brainstem: a feasibility study.

A Charlotte P Sewing1, Viola Caretti2, Tonny Lagerweij2, Pepijn Schellen2, Marc H A Jansen1, Dannis G van Vuurden1, Sander Idema3, Carla F M Molthoff4, W Peter Vandertop5, Gertjan J L Kaspers6, David P Noske3, Esther Hulleman7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systemic delivery of therapeutic agents remains ineffective against diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), possibly due to an intact blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and to dose-limiting toxicity of systemic chemotherapeutic agents. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) into the brainstem may provide an effective local delivery alternative for DIPG patients. NEW
METHOD: The aim of this study is to develop a method to perform CED into the murine brainstem and to test this method using the chemotherapeutic agent carmustine (BiCNU). To this end, a newly designed murine CED catheter was tested in vitro and in vivo. After determination of safety and distribution, mice bearing VUMC-DIPG-3 and E98FM-DIPG brainstem tumors were treated with carmustine dissolved in DW 5% or carmustine dissolved in 10% ethanol.
RESULTS: Our results show that CED into the murine brainstem is feasible and well tolerated by mice with and without brainstem tumors. CED of carmustine dissolved in 5% DW increased median survival of mice with VUMC-DIPG-3 and E98FM-DIPG tumors with 35% and 25% respectively. Dissolving carmustine in 10% ethanol further improved survival to 45% in mice with E98FM-DIPG tumors. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: Since genetically engineered and primary DIPG models are currently only available in mice, murine CED studies have clear advantages over CED studies in other animals.
CONCLUSION: CED in the murine brainstem can be performed safely, is well tolerated and can be used to study efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents orthotopically. These results set the foundation for more CED studies in murine DIPG models.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brainstem; Carmustine; Convection-enhanced delivery; DIPG; Mouse model; Pontine glioma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263805     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  10 in total

Review 1.  Convection-Enhanced Delivery in Children: Techniques and Applications.

Authors:  K Aquilina; A Chakrapani; L Carr; M A Kurian; D Hargrave
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

2.  A combined approach of convection-enhanced delivery of peptide nanofiber reservoir to prolong local DM1 retention for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma treatment.

Authors:  Vanessa Bellat; Yago Alcaina; Ching-Hsuan Tung; Richard Ting; Adam O Michel; Mark Souweidane; Benedict Law
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Evaluating infusate parameters for direct drug delivery to the brainstem: a comparative study of convection-enhanced delivery versus osmotic pump delivery.

Authors:  Julian S Rechberger; Erica A Power; Victor M Lu; Liang Zhang; Jann N Sarkaria; David J Daniels
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 4.  Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier.

Authors:  David S Hersh; Aniket S Wadajkar; Nathan Roberts; Jimena G Perez; Nina P Connolly; Victor Frenkel; Jeffrey A Winkles; Graeme F Woodworth; Anthony J Kim
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

5.  Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Authors:  Catherine S Grasso; Yujie Tang; Nathalene Truffaux; Noah E Berlow; Lining Liu; Marie-Anne Debily; Michael J Quist; Lara E Davis; Elaine C Huang; Pamelyn J Woo; Anitha Ponnuswami; Spenser Chen; Tessa B Johung; Wenchao Sun; Mari Kogiso; Yuchen Du; Lin Qi; Yulun Huang; Marianne Hütt-Cabezas; Katherine E Warren; Ludivine Le Dret; Paul S Meltzer; Hua Mao; Martha Quezado; Dannis G van Vuurden; Jinu Abraham; Maryam Fouladi; Matthew N Svalina; Nicholas Wang; Cynthia Hawkins; Javad Nazarian; Marta M Alonso; Eric H Raabe; Esther Hulleman; Paul T Spellman; Xiao-Nan Li; Charles Keller; Ranadip Pal; Jacques Grill; Michelle Monje
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Genomic Insights into Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.

Authors:  Danielle H Lapin; Maria Tsoli; David S Ziegler
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Characterization of the Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity and the Brain Transport of SN-38 in an Orthotopic Xenograft Rat Model of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.

Authors:  Catarina Chaves; Xavier Declèves; Meryam Taghi; Marie-Claude Menet; Joelle Lacombe; Pascale Varlet; Nagore G Olaciregui; Angel M Carcaboso; Salvatore Cisternino
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Temporal Characterization of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption with High-Frequency Electroporation.

Authors:  Melvin F Lorenzo; Sean C Thomas; Yukitaka Kani; Jonathan Hinckley; Matthew Lee; Joy Adler; Scott S Verbridge; Fang-Chi Hsu; John L Robertson; Rafael V Davalos; John H Rossmeisl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Enhancer of Zeste Homolog-2 (EZH2) Inhibitor for the Treatment of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.

Authors:  Takahiro Sasaki; Hiroaki Katagi; Stewart Goldman; Oren J Becher; Rintaro Hashizume
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Pre-Clinical Models of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma.

Authors:  Katherine L Misuraca; Francisco J Cordero; Oren J Becher
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.