Vanessa Bellat1, Yago Alcaina1, Ching-Hsuan Tung1, Richard Ting1, Adam O Michel2, Mark Souweidane3, Benedict Law1. 1. Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 2. Laboratory of Comparative Pathology, Center of Comparative Medicine and Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, The Rockefeller University, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a highly lethal malignancy that occurs predominantly in children. DIPG is inoperable and post-diagnosis survival is less than 1 year, as conventional chemotherapy is ineffective. The intact blood-brain barrier (BBB) blocks drugs from entering the brain. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a direct infusion technique delivering drugs to the brain, but it suffers from rapid drug clearance. Our goal is to overcome the delivery barrier via CED and maintain a therapeutic concentration at the glioma site with a payload-adjustable peptide nanofiber precursor (NFP) that displays a prolonged retention property as a drug carrier. METHODS: The post-CED retention of 89Zr-NFP was determined in real time using PET/CT imaging. Emtansine (DM1), a microtubule inhibitor, was conjugated to NFP. The cytotoxicity of the resulting DM1-NFP was tested against patient-derived DIPG cell lines. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in animals bearing orthotopic DIPG, according to glioma growth (measured using bioluminescence imaging) and the long-term survival. RESULTS: DM1-NFP demonstrated potency against multiple glioma cell lines. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration values were in the nanomolar range. NFP remained at the infusion site (pons) for weeks, with a clearance half-life of 60 days. DM1-NFP inhibited glioma progression in animals, and offered a survival benefit (median survival of 62 days) compared with the untreated controls (28 days) and DM1-treated animal group (26 days). CONCLUSIONS: CED, in combination with DM1-NFP, complementarily functions to bypass the BBB, prolong drug retention at the fusion site, and maintain an effective therapeutic effect against DIPG to improve treatment outcome.
BACKGROUND: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a highly lethal malignancy that occurs predominantly in children. DIPG is inoperable and post-diagnosis survival is less than 1 year, as conventional chemotherapy is ineffective. The intact blood-brain barrier (BBB) blocks drugs from entering the brain. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a direct infusion technique delivering drugs to the brain, but it suffers from rapid drug clearance. Our goal is to overcome the delivery barrier via CED and maintain a therapeutic concentration at the glioma site with a payload-adjustable peptide nanofiber precursor (NFP) that displays a prolonged retention property as a drug carrier. METHODS: The post-CED retention of 89Zr-NFP was determined in real time using PET/CT imaging. Emtansine (DM1), a microtubule inhibitor, was conjugated to NFP. The cytotoxicity of the resulting DM1-NFP was tested against patient-derived DIPG cell lines. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in animals bearing orthotopic DIPG, according to glioma growth (measured using bioluminescence imaging) and the long-term survival. RESULTS: DM1-NFP demonstrated potency against multiple glioma cell lines. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration values were in the nanomolar range. NFP remained at the infusion site (pons) for weeks, with a clearance half-life of 60 days. DM1-NFP inhibited glioma progression in animals, and offered a survival benefit (median survival of 62 days) compared with the untreated controls (28 days) and DM1-treated animal group (26 days). CONCLUSIONS: CED, in combination with DM1-NFP, complementarily functions to bypass the BBB, prolong drug retention at the fusion site, and maintain an effective therapeutic effect against DIPG to improve treatment outcome.
Authors: Mark Rosenthal; Richard Curry; David A Reardon; Erik Rasmussen; Vijay V Upreti; Michael A Damore; Haby A Henary; John S Hill; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Evan D Bander; Karima Tizi; Eva Wembacher-Schroeder; Rowena Thomson; Maria Donzelli; Elizabeth Vasconcellos; Mark M Souweidane Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Paul L Chariou; Karin L Lee; Jonathan K Pokorski; Gerald M Saidel; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: William G B Singleton; Alison S Bienemann; Max Woolley; David Johnson; Owen Lewis; Marcella J Wyatt; Stephen J P Damment; Lisa J Boulter; Clare L Killick-Cole; Daniel J Asby; Steven S Gill Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Susanna J E Veringa; Dennis Biesmans; Dannis G van Vuurden; Marc H A Jansen; Laurine E Wedekind; Ilona Horsman; Pieter Wesseling; William Peter Vandertop; David P Noske; GertJan J L Kaspers; Esther Hulleman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 3.240