OBJECTIVES: This pilot randomised controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using a polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold in fresh extraction sockets for ridge preservation. The hypothesis was that the insertion of a 3D bioresorbable PCL scaffold in fresh extraction sockets allowed for normal bone healing and better maintenance of ridge dimensions after 6 months as compared to extraction sockets without the scaffold. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Thirteen patients were randomised to either the test group (N = 6) where a PCL scaffold was inserted in the tooth socket after extraction or the control group (N = 7) where no space filler was used. Alveolar ridge height and width measurements were made at baseline and 6 months post-extraction, for the evaluation of bone resorption. At 6 months, a core of bone was trephined out from the healed ridge for microcomputed tomographic (micro CT) and histological analyses, immediately before Stage I dental implant surgery. Stage II dental implant surgery was performed 4-6 months later. RESULTS: There was less vertical ridge resorption in the test group compared to the control group, and the difference was statistically significant in the mesio-buccal aspect (P = 0.008). Micro CT and histological observations showed mainly mineralised bone formation in both groups, except for one specimen in the test group. CONCLUSIONS: The insertion of a 3D bioresorbable PCL scaffold in fresh extraction sockets allowed for normal bone healing, and there was better maintenance of ridge height after 6 months as compared to extraction sockets without the scaffold.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This pilot randomised controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using a polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold in fresh extraction sockets for ridge preservation. The hypothesis was that the insertion of a 3D bioresorbable PCL scaffold in fresh extraction sockets allowed for normal bone healing and better maintenance of ridge dimensions after 6 months as compared to extraction sockets without the scaffold. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen patients were randomised to either the test group (N = 6) where a PCL scaffold was inserted in the tooth socket after extraction or the control group (N = 7) where no space filler was used. Alveolar ridge height and width measurements were made at baseline and 6 months post-extraction, for the evaluation of bone resorption. At 6 months, a core of bone was trephined out from the healed ridge for microcomputed tomographic (micro CT) and histological analyses, immediately before Stage I dental implant surgery. Stage II dental implant surgery was performed 4-6 months later. RESULTS: There was less vertical ridge resorption in the test group compared to the control group, and the difference was statistically significant in the mesio-buccal aspect (P = 0.008). Micro CT and histological observations showed mainly mineralised bone formation in both groups, except for one specimen in the test group. CONCLUSIONS: The insertion of a 3D bioresorbable PCL scaffold in fresh extraction sockets allowed for normal bone healing, and there was better maintenance of ridge height after 6 months as compared to extraction sockets without the scaffold.
Authors: Daniel Clark; Yogalakshmi Rajendran; Sarmad Paydar; Sunita Ho; Darren Cox; Mark Ryder; John Dollard; Richard T Kao Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.993
Authors: Farah Asa'ad; Giorgio Pagni; Sophia P Pilipchuk; Aldo Bruno Giannì; William V Giannobile; Giulio Rasperini Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2016-06-05
Authors: Heather E Owston; Katrina M Moisley; Giuseppe Tronci; Stephen J Russell; Peter V Giannoudis; Elena Jones Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 6.208