Nigel Rees1, Frances Rapport2, Gareth Thomas2, Ann John2, Helen Snooks2. 1. Swansea University, Pre-hospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nigel.rees@wales.nhs.uk. 2. Swansea University, Pre-hospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The U.K. has one of the highest rates of self harm in Europe at 400 per 100,000 of population. Paramedics and emergency staff may be the first professionals encountered, therefore understanding their views and approaches to care is crucial. The aim of this study was to systematically review published quantitative literature relating to paramedic and emergency workers' perceptions and experiences of caring for people who self harm. METHODS: CINAHL®, MEDLINE®, OVID ® and Psych INFO® databases were searched, PRISMA guidelines were followed, two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full papers against a priori eligibility criteria. Data synthesis was achieved by extracting and descriptively analysing study characteristics and findings. RESULTS: 16 studies met inclusion criteria; one included ambulance staff, all used questionnaires. Training, policies and guidelines improved staff knowledge and confidence in caring for people who self harm. Limited access to training was reported, ranging from 75% to 90% of staff lacking any. Limited departmental guidelines were also reported. Staff in acute settings exhibited increased feelings of negativity, becoming less positive closer to front line care. Recent studies report positive attitudes amongst emergency staff. DISCUSSION: Despite guidelines indicating need for education and policies to guide staff in self harm care, there is limited evidence of this happening in practice. The lack of literature including paramedics suggests a gap in our understanding about care for self harm patients. This gap warrants greater attention in order to improve care for patients who self harm in their first point of contact. Crown
OBJECTIVE: The U.K. has one of the highest rates of self harm in Europe at 400 per 100,000 of population. Paramedics and emergency staff may be the first professionals encountered, therefore understanding their views and approaches to care is crucial. The aim of this study was to systematically review published quantitative literature relating to paramedic and emergency workers' perceptions and experiences of caring for people who self harm. METHODS: CINAHL®, MEDLINE®, OVID ® and Psych INFO® databases were searched, PRISMA guidelines were followed, two researchers independently screened titles, abstracts and full papers against a priori eligibility criteria. Data synthesis was achieved by extracting and descriptively analysing study characteristics and findings. RESULTS: 16 studies met inclusion criteria; one included ambulance staff, all used questionnaires. Training, policies and guidelines improved staff knowledge and confidence in caring for people who self harm. Limited access to training was reported, ranging from 75% to 90% of staff lacking any. Limited departmental guidelines were also reported. Staff in acute settings exhibited increased feelings of negativity, becoming less positive closer to front line care. Recent studies report positive attitudes amongst emergency staff. DISCUSSION: Despite guidelines indicating need for education and policies to guide staff in self harm care, there is limited evidence of this happening in practice. The lack of literature including paramedics suggests a gap in our understanding about care for self harm patients. This gap warrants greater attention in order to improve care for patients who self harm in their first point of contact. Crown
Authors: Rohan Borschmann; Jesse T Young; Paul Moran; Matthew J Spittal; Ed Heffernan; Katherine Mok; Stuart A Kinner Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Terence V McCann; Michael Savic; Nyssa Ferguson; Alison Cheetham; Katrina Witt; Kate Emond; Emma Bosley; Karen Smith; Louise Roberts; Dan I Lubman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Nyssa Ferguson; Michael Savic; Terence V McCann; Kate Emond; Emma Sandral; Karen Smith; Louise Roberts; Emma Bosley; Dan I Lubman Journal: Health Expect Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Bronwyn Keefe; Kelsi Carolan; Amy J Wint; Matthew Goudreau; W Scott Cluett; Lisa I Iezzoni Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Mohammed Gaber Zayed; Victoria Williams; Alexander Charles Glendenning; Jenna Katherine Bulger; Tom Hewes; Alison Porter; Helen Snooks; A John Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.740