| Literature DB >> 25263348 |
Charley Christian Staats, Angela Junges, Rafael Lucas Muniz Guedes, Claudia Elizabeth Thompson, Guilherme Loss de Morais, Juliano Tomazzoni Boldo, Luiz Gonzaga Paula de Almeida, Fábio Carrer Andreis, Alexandra Lehmkuhl Gerber, Nicolau Sbaraini, Rana Louise de Andrade da Paixão, Leonardo Broetto, Melissa Landell, Lucélia Santi, Walter Orlando Beys-da-Silva, Carolina Pereira Silveira, Thaiane Rispoli Serrano, Eder Silva de Oliveira, Lívia Kmetzsch, Marilene Henning Vainstein, Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos, Augusto Schrank1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metarhizium anisopliae is an entomopathogenic fungus used in the biological control of some agricultural insect pests, and efforts are underway to use this fungus in the control of insect-borne human diseases. A large repertoire of proteins must be secreted by M. anisopliae to cope with the various available nutrients as this fungus switches through different lifestyles, i.e., from a saprophytic, to an infectious, to a plant endophytic stage. To further evaluate the predicted secretome of M. anisopliae, we employed genomic and transcriptomic analyses, coupled with phylogenomic analysis, focusing on the identification and characterization of secreted proteins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25263348 PMCID: PMC4246632 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-822
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
General information concerning the E6 genome assembly
| Software | Newbler 2.8 | WGS-CA 7.0 | Minimus2/Consed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scaffolds | 191 | 516 | - |
| Total scaffold size (bp) | 38,326,054 | 38,454,426 | - |
| Contigs | 677 | 688 | 376* |
| Total contig size (bp) | 38,369,953 | 38,434,596 | 38,478,534 |
| Scaffold N50 | 622,803 | 167,523 | - |
| Contig N50 | 157,963 | 125,686 | 319,537 |
| Longest scaffold | 1,756,362 | 638,367 | - |
| Longest contig | 735,175 | 638,367 | 1,044,648 |
| Coverage | 19 X | 19.6 X | - |
| Singlets | 3,552 | 39,616 | - |
*A total of 366 contigs larger than 200 base pairs were deposited in NCBI with the accession number JNNZ00000000.
Comparison of the primary genome features between and other entomopathogenic fungi
| Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain | E6 | ARSEF23 | CQMa102 | CM01 | ARSEF2860 |
| Host-range | Broad | Broad | Locust | Broad | Broad |
| Sequencing plataform | 454 | Solexa | Solexa | 454/Illumina | 454/Illumina |
| Size (Mbp) | 38.5 | 39.0 | 38.1 | 32.2 | 33.7 |
| Coverage | 19 X | 100 X | 107 X | 147 X | 76.7 X |
| GC content (%) | 51.0 | 51.5 | 50.0 | 51.4 | 51.5 |
| Protein-coding genes | 10,817 | 10,582 | 9,849 | 9,684 | 10,366 |
| Gene density* | 280 | 271 | 259 | 301 | 308 |
| Exons/gene | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 2.7 |
| tRNA | 181 | 141 | 122 | 136 | 113 |
M. robertsii and M. acridum data [18], as well from B. bassiana[19] and C. militaris[22] were collected from the respectives references.
*Genes per Mbp.
Figure 1Comparative genomics analyses of entomopathogenic fungi. Venn diagram comparing the complete proteomes (A) or the ortholog sequences alone (B). M. anisopliae (M. anisopliae E6), M. robertsii (M. anisopliae ARSEF 23), M. acridum (M. acridum CQMa 102) and C. militaris (C. militaris CM01) were used for comparisons. The diagram in B was constructed using best bidirectional BLAST hits, >60% positive amino acid alignments, >60% subject coverage and a cut-off e-value of <1e-05, without paralogs.
Figure 2Conservation of secreted proteins in fungi. A. Comparison of the M. anisopliae E6 secretome and its homologs in fifteen analyzed fungi genomes. B. Prediction of signal peptide in M. anisopliae E6 homologs. C. Comparison of copy numbers of the M. anisopliae E6 secretome homologs D. Signal peptide presence in putative alternative downstream translation initiation sites for methionine.
Figure 3Gene duplication and protein size box-plot for all sequences predicted to be secreted or non-secreted. Mean protein sizes, represented as black dots, were compared with a one-tailed Student’s t-test. *Secreted mean smaller than the non-secreted mean with same copy number, **Non-secreted mean greater than one copy less than the non-secreted mean, ***Secreted mean greater than one copy less than the secreted mean, ****Secreted mean smaller than one copy of the less secreted mean. All p-values < 0.001. Four or more copies were grouped together.
Figure 4RNA-Seq analysis of differentially expressed genes from E6. Comparison of the expression profile from C-48 h (Control-48 h) and I-48 h (Infection-48 h) (A) or I-48 h (Infection-48 h) and I-144 h (Infection-144 h) (B) was conducted with the edgeR software package. The overall expression of genes (left panel), the number of differentially expressed genes (middle panel), and the secretome-associated genes (right panel) are shown.
Figure 5Superfamily functional categories of identified expressed genes. The total gene numbers and the percentages of the predicted secretome are for each of the five distinct regulation profiles (A-E). I: edgeR pairwise comparison C-48 h:I-48 h; II: I-48 h:I-144 h. F: Nucleotide m-tr*; G: Carbohydrate m-tr*; HA: Small molecule binding; J: Translation; LA: DNA-binding; O: Protein modification; OA: Proteases; OB: Kinases-phosphatases; P: Ion m-tr*; Q: Secondary metabolism; R: General; RA: Redox; RB: Transferases; RC: Other enzymes. *m-tr: Metabolism and transport. Categories with representativeness < 3% were grouped as Others. The complete classification can be found at: http://supfam.cs.bris.ac.uk/SUPERFAMILY/function.html.
Figure 6Fungal evolutionary history obtained by using a phylogenomic approach. NJ methods were employed to all orthologs identified in the fungal genomes (A). Nearest neighbor interchange method with a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree calculated from average consensus distances were employed to all orthologs identified in the fungal secretomes (B). The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates for genomic and 100 for secretomic analysis) is shown next to the branches. The scale bar represents substitutions of amino acids per site.