Literature DB >> 25262852

Health-related quality of life in advanced prostate cancer and its treatments: biochemical failure and metastatic disease populations.

Oliver Sartor1, Emuella Flood2, Kathleen Beusterien3, Josephine Park4, Iain Webb4, David MacLean4, Bruce J O Wong5, H Mark Lin4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to examine the impact of advanced prostate cancer and its treatments on patients' perceptions of their health and to better understand concerns not captured by currently available health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Open ended one-on-one interviews were conducted with patients with prostate cancer who had biochemical failure or metastatic cancer to understand the impacts of disease and treatments on patients' perceptions of their lives. Interviews with 25 patients (7 biochemical failure and 18 metastatic) and 6 clinicians were conducted. Patient responses were analyzed to assess whether information saturation (ie, the point at which no new information is collected) was attained and compared with currently available HRQL instruments. The data informed the development of a comprehensive conceptual model illustrating the impacts of advanced disease and treatments. Clinical expert interviews also informed the conceptual model.
RESULTS: Patients with prostate cancer reported many of the key symptoms already captured by current measures, such as bone pain, urinary functioning, bowel functioning, and fatigue. However, a number of impacts reported as bothersome by patients were identified that are not fully captured by existing HRQL measures. Specific examples include genital atrophy, muscle atrophy, stamina, body image, and emotional well-being.
CONCLUSION: The conceptual model identified herein describes the impacts of prostate cancer and its treatments from the patient's perspective. The model can be useful in identifying key concepts important to patients that should be measured in trials to capture treatment benefits. The model also can help inform the selection of patient-reported outcomes to assess these benefits.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conceptual model; Interviews; PRO; Patient perspective; Patient-reported outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25262852     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  11 in total

1.  Symptoms and Impacts in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Findings from Patient and Physician Interviews.

Authors:  Stefan Holmstrom; Shevani Naidoo; James Turnbull; Emily Hawryluk; Jean Paty; Robert Morlock
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Strategies for living well with hormone-responsive advanced prostate cancer-a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Lauren Matheson; Jo Nayoan; Carol Rivas; Jo Brett; Penny Wright; Hugh Butcher; Paul Jordan; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Malcolm Mason; Richard Wagland; Eila Watson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives on the Use of Information in Treatment Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Sujane Kandasamy; Ahmad Firas Khalid; Umair Majid; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Cancer Related Fatigue and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andreas Charalambous; Christiana Kouta
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Functional analysis implicating the SNP rs61552325 in ERBB2 as an effector for androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  Xianxiang Xin; Yinmin Gu; Yang Chen; Yuanjie Huang; Zengnan Mo; Yanling Hu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Symptoms and Impacts in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Study Findings.

Authors:  Erin L Tomaszewski; Pierre Moise; Robert N Krupnick; Jared Downing; Margaret Meyer; Shevani Naidoo; Stefan Holmstrom
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patient Preferences for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Men in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Hayley M de Freitas; Tetsuro Ito; Monica Hadi; Gemma Al-Jassar; Mickaël Henry-Szatkowski; Beenish Nafees; Andrew J Lloyd
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Impact of fatigue on quality of life among breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fares Mohammed Saeed Muthanna; Mahmathi Karuppannan; Bassam Abdul Rasool Hassan; Ali Haider Mohammed
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2021-04-29

9.  Promotional Payments Made to Urologists by the Pharmaceutical Industry and Prescribing Patterns for Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Mary Oerline; Samuel R Kaufman; Megan E V Caram; Stacie B Dusetzina; Andy M Ryan; Vahakn B Shahinian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Examining the Priorities, Needs and Preferences of Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Designing a Personalised eHealth Exercise Intervention.

Authors:  Holly E L Evans; Cynthia C Forbes; Corneel Vandelanotte; Daniel A Galvão; Robert U Newton; Gary Wittert; Suzanne Chambers; Ganessan Kichenadasse; Nicholas Brook; Danielle Girard; Camille E Short
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.