Literature DB >> 25262244

Self-monitoring of dietary intake by young women: online food records completed on computer or smartphone are as accurate as paper-based food records but more acceptable.

Melinda J Hutchesson, Megan E Rollo, Robin Callister, Clare E Collins.   

Abstract

Adherence and accuracy of self-monitoring of dietary intake influences success in weight management interventions. Information technologies such as computers and smartphones have the potential to improve adherence and accuracy by reducing the burden associated with monitoring dietary intake using traditional paper-based food records. We evaluated the acceptability and accuracy of three different 7-day food record methods (online accessed via computer, online accessed via smartphone, and paper-based). Young women (N=18; aged 23.4±2.9 years; body mass index 24.0±2.2) completed the three 7-day food records in random order with 7-day washout periods between each method. Total energy expenditure (TEE) was derived from resting energy expenditure (REE) measured by indirect calorimetry and physical activity level (PAL) derived from accelerometers (TEE=REE×PAL). Accuracy of the three methods was assessed by calculating absolute (energy intake [EI]-TEE) and percentage difference (EI/TEE×100) between self-reported EI and TEE. Acceptability was assessed via questionnaire. Mean±standard deviation TEE was 2,185±302 kcal/day and EI was 1,729±249 kcal/day, 1,675±287kcal/day, and 1,682±352 kcal/day for computer, smartphone, and paper records, respectively. There were no significant differences between absolute and percentage differences between EI and TEE for the three methods: computer, -510±389 kcal/day (78%); smartphone, -456±372 kcal/day (80%); and paper, -503±513 kcal/day (79%). Half of participants (n=9) preferred computer recording, 44.4% preferred smartphone, and 5.6% preferred paper-based records. Most participants (89%) least preferred the paper-based record. Because online food records completed on either computer or smartphone were as accurate as paper-based records but more acceptable to young women, they should be considered when self-monitoring of intake is recommended to young women.
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptability; Accuracy; Computer; Self-monitor; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25262244     DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  37 in total

1.  The time course of short-term hypertrophy in the absence of eccentric muscle damage.

Authors:  Matt S Stock; Jacob A Mota; Ryan N DeFranco; Katherine A Grue; A Unique Jacobo; Eunhee Chung; Jordan R Moon; Jason M DeFreitas; Travis W Beck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Emerging trends of technology-based dietary assessment: a perspective study.

Authors:  Xueyin Zhao; Xiaochen Xu; Xiuyan Li; Xi He; Yang Yang; Shankuan Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Jena S Tronieri; Meghan L Butryn
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020 Feb-Mar

4.  NFC as a Childhood Obesity Treatment Tool.

Authors:  P Díaz-Hellín; J Fontecha; R Hervás; J Bravo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Smartphone Applications for Promoting Healthy Diet and Nutrition: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Mary Whitehead; Joyce Q Sheats; Jeff Mastromonico; Dale Hardy; Selina A Smith
Journal:  Jacobs J Food Nutr       Date:  2015

6.  Maternal Body Weight and Gestational Diabetes Differentially Influence Placental and Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  J Martino; S Sebert; M T Segura; L García-Valdés; J Florido; M C Padilla; A Marcos; R Rueda; H J McArdle; H Budge; M E Symonds; C Campoy
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Application of Innovative Technologies for Improved Food Quality and Safety.

Authors:  Yiannis Kourkoutas; Nikos Chorianopoulos; Aspasia Nisiotou; Vasilis P Valdramidis; Kimon A G Karatzas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Towards a Universal Approach Based on Omics Technologies for the Quality Control of Food.

Authors:  Emanuele Ferri; Andrea Galimberti; Maurizio Casiraghi; Cristina Airoldi; Carlotta Ciaramelli; Alessandro Palmioli; Valerio Mezzasalma; Ilaria Bruni; Massimo Labra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Schoeppe; Stephanie Alley; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Nicola A Bray; Susan L Williams; Mitch J Duncan; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): Comparison of a Mobile Phone Digital Entry App for Dietary Data Collection With 24-Hour Dietary Recalls.

Authors:  Anna M Rangan; Sarah O'Connor; Valentina Giannelli; Megan Lh Yap; Lie Ming Tang; Rajshri Roy; Jimmy Chun Yu Louie; Lana Hebden; Judy Kay; Margaret Allman-Farinelli
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.