K Silf1, N Woodhead2, J Kelly3, A Fryer4, C Kettle5, K M K Ismail6. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University Hospital Crosshouse, Kilmarnock Road, Crosshouse, Kilmarnock, East Ayrshire KA2 0BE, UK. Electronic address: ksilf@hotmail.com. 2. Birmingham Centre for Women and Children׳s Health, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK. Electronic address: nwoodhead@doctors.org.uk. 3. The Maternity Centre, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK. Electronic address: june.kelly@uhns.nhs.uk. 4. Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University Medical School, Thornburrow Drive, ST4 7QB Staffordshire, UK. Electronic address: Anthony.Fryer@uhns.nhs.uk. 5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Staffordshire University, Blackheath Lane, Stafford ST18 0AD, UK. Electronic address: C.Kettle@staffs.ac.uk. 6. Birmingham Centre for Women and Children׳s Health, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK. Electronic address: K.ismail@bham.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. In the UK the use of episiotomy is selective, rather than routine, and a right mediolateral episiotomy (RMLE) is considered standard practice. According to The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2007) guideline for intrapartum care such an episiotomy should be cut at an angle between 45° and 60° to the vertical axis. Recent evidence suggests that the angle of incision of mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) is associated with risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). OBJECTIVE: to assess the accuracy of individual practitioner's techniques when performing a RMLE. DESIGN: an audit of practice against nationally set standards. SETTING: at a national midwifery conference and prior to three multiprofessional perineal repair training workshops in the West Midlands region of the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 144 midwives and 53 obstetric trainees. MEASUREMENTS: practitioners were asked to perform a RMLE incision on a bespoke training model, which is designed to give a realistic representation of a stretched perineum at crowning of the baby's head. Four parameters were measured: (1) distance of the starting point from the midline; (2) angle subtended to the perpendicular; (3) length and (4) shape of the incision (curved, straight or J-shaped). FINDINGS: of the 197 incisions performed only 12.7% (14.6%, n=21/144 of midwives and 7.5%, n=4/53 of obstetricians) complied with the defined technique of a RMLE for correctness of angle and placement. A 2-sided Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference between previous attendance at perineal management training and incision accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Episiotomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. In the UK the use of episiotomy is selective, rather than routine, and a right mediolateral episiotomy (RMLE) is considered standard practice. According to The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2007) guideline for intrapartum care such an episiotomy should be cut at an angle between 45° and 60° to the vertical axis. Recent evidence suggests that the angle of incision of mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) is associated with risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). OBJECTIVE: to assess the accuracy of individual practitioner's techniques when performing a RMLE. DESIGN: an audit of practice against nationally set standards. SETTING: at a national midwifery conference and prior to three multiprofessional perineal repair training workshops in the West Midlands region of the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 144 midwives and 53 obstetric trainees. MEASUREMENTS: practitioners were asked to perform a RMLE incision on a bespoke training model, which is designed to give a realistic representation of a stretched perineum at crowning of the baby's head. Four parameters were measured: (1) distance of the starting point from the midline; (2) angle subtended to the perpendicular; (3) length and (4) shape of the incision (curved, straight or J-shaped). FINDINGS: of the 197 incisions performed only 12.7% (14.6%, n=21/144 of midwives and 7.5%, n=4/53 of obstetricians) complied with the defined technique of a RMLE for correctness of angle and placement. A 2-sided Fisher's exact test showed no significant difference between previous attendance at perineal management training and incision accuracy.
Authors: Hadil Y Ali-Masri; Sahar J Hassan; Kaled M Zimmo; Mohammed W Zimmo; Khaled M K Ismail; Erik Fosse; Hasan Alsalman; Åse Vikanes; Katariina Laine Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int Date: 2018-10-29
Authors: Madhu Naidu; Dharmesh S Kapoor; Sarah Evans; Latha Vinayakarao; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Nadia Rahman; Latha Vinayakarao; Sangeeta Pathak; Dawn Minden; Louise Melson; Ella Vitue; A Pradhan Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Danielle K Garner; Akash B Patel; Jun Hung; Monica Castro; Tamar G Segev; Jeffrey H Plochocki; Margaret I Hall Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-02-02