Literature DB >> 25260893

Is low serum albumin associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal malignancies?

Sean L Goh1, Ramesh P De Silva2, Kumud Dhital3, Rohan M Gett4.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal malignancy, is low serum albumin associated with postoperative complications? Altogether, 87 papers were found using the reported search, of which 16 demonstrated the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. This paper includes 2 level 2 papers, 12 level 3 papers and 2 level 4 papers. All the papers compared either all or some of the following postoperative complications: mortality, morbidity, anastomotic leak, respiratory and non-respiratory complications, and length of hospital stay. Eleven of the 16 papers found an association between low serum albumin and postoperative complications. Of these, one study showed that low serum albumin combined with low fibrinogen levels (FA score) was predictive of postoperative recurrence of oesophageal cancer. Another study showed that when combined with white cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP, NUn score), serum albumin had a high diagnostic accuracy for major complications after postoperative day 3. The largest study compared the in-hospital mortality in 7227 patients who underwent oesophageal surgery for malignancy. The percentage of in-hospital mortality was associated with low serum albumin (<15.0 vs >35.0 g/l, 21.0 vs 11.3%, P <0.001). Five of the 16 papers found no significant association between low serum albumin and postoperative complications. Of these papers, one showed that low serum albumin was not an independent risk factor, while four others found no association between low serum albumin with respiratory complications, anastomotic leak and postoperative mortality. Instead, these studies found other factors responsible for postoperative complications such as: CRP, smoking, disease duration, malnutrition and low T-cell levels. Taken together, while low serum albumin is associated with postoperative complications, opinion regarding the prognostic value of low serum albumin and nutritional support remains conflicted. Because of the confounding factors encountered in these studies, the clinician should consider the finding of low serum albumin in patients, together with disease and surgical factors to provide optimal care for these patients.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oesophageal cancer; Oesophagectomy; Perioperative care; Postoperative complications; Serum albumin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25260893     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  23 in total

1.  Impact of change in serum albumin level during and after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kazuya Takeda; Rei Umezawa; Noriyoshi Takahashi; Haruo Matsushita; Maiko Kozumi; Yojiro Ishikawa; Takaya Yamamoto; Ken Takeda; Keiichi Jingu
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Clinical usefulness of the surgical Apgar score for estimating short-term and prognostic outcomes after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Naoya Yoshida; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Feeding Challenges in Patients with Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancers.

Authors:  Daniel Reim; Helmut Friess
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-01-08

4.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgical resections for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Herzberg; Tim Strate; Salman Yousuf Guraya; Human Honarpisheh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Anaesthesia during oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Denise P Veelo; Bart F Geerts
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  [Hyperspectral imaging of gastrointestinal anastomoses].

Authors:  B Jansen-Winkeln; M Maktabi; J P Takoh; S M Rabe; M Barberio; H Köhler; T Neumuth; A Melzer; C Chalopin; I Gockel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Effects of a preoperative immune-modulating diet in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective parallel group randomized study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Tomoaki Yatabe; Masaya Munekage; Fumiyasu Yamasaki; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Non-surgical versus surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lawrence M J Best; Muntzer Mughal; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-29

9.  [Perioperative clinical characteristics of patients with pathological fracture of proximal femur].

Authors:  Y P Cui; C Mi; B Wang; Y X Pa; Y F Lin; X D Shi
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

10.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ju Sik Yun; Kook Joo Na; Sang Yun Song; Seok Kim; In Seok Jeong; Sang Gi Oh
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.