Literature DB >> 25260329

Relationship between promoter sequence and its strength in gene expression.

Jingwei Li1, Yunxin Zhang.   

Abstract

Promoter strength, or activity, is important in genetic engineering and synthetic biology. A constitutive promoter with a certain strength for one given RNA can often be reused for other RNAs. Therefore, the strength of one promoter is mainly determined by its nucleotide sequence. One of the main difficulties in genetic engineering and synthetic biology is how to control the expression of a certain protein at a given level. One usually used way to achieve this goal is to choose one promoter with a suitable strength which can be employed to regulate the rate of transcription, which then leads to the required level of protein expression. For this purpose, so far, many promoter libraries have been established experimentally. However, theoretical methods to predict the strength of one promoter from its nucleotide sequence are desirable. Such methods are not only valuable in the design of promoter with specified strength, but also meaningful to understand the mechanism of promoter in gene transcription. In this study, through various tests, a theoretical model is presented to describe the relationship between promoter strength and nucleotide sequence. Our analysis shows that promoter strength is greatly influenced by nucleotide groups with three adjacent nucleotides in their sequences. Meanwhile, nucleotides in different regions of promoter sequence have different effects on promoter strength. Based on experimental data for E. coli promoters, our calculations indicate that nucleotides in the -10 region, the -35 region, and the discriminator region of a promoter sequence are more important for determining promoter strength than those in the spacing region. With model parameter values obtained by fitting to experimental data, four promoter libraries are theoretically built for the corresponding experimental environments under which data for promoter strength in gene expression has been measured previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25260329     DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2014-14086-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter        ISSN: 1292-8941            Impact factor:   1.890


  31 in total

Review 1.  Artificial promoters for metabolic optimization.

Authors:  P R Jensen; K Hammer
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1998 Apr 20-May 5       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  NUPACK: Analysis and design of nucleic acid systems.

Authors:  Joseph N Zadeh; Conrad D Steenberg; Justin S Bois; Brian R Wolfe; Marshall B Pierce; Asif R Khan; Robert M Dirks; Niles A Pierce
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Using deep sequencing to characterize the biophysical mechanism of a transcriptional regulatory sequence.

Authors:  Justin B Kinney; Anand Murugan; Curtis G Callan; Edward C Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Extracting relations between promoter sequences and their strengths from microarray data.

Authors:  Hisanori Kiryu; Taku Oshima; Kiyoshi Asai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Tunable promoters in systems biology.

Authors:  Ivan Mijakovic; Dina Petranovic; Peter Ruhdal Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Thermodynamic modeling of variations in the rate of RNA chain elongation of E. coli rrn operons.

Authors:  David Fange; Harriet Mellenius; Patrick P Dennis; Måns Ehrenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Escherichia coli promoter sequences predict in vitro RNA polymerase selectivity.

Authors:  M E Mulligan; D K Hawley; R Entriken; W R McClure
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  A structure/function analysis of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  C A Gross; C L Chan; M A Lonetto
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1996-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Transcription initiation by mix and match elements: flexibility for polymerase binding to bacterial promoters.

Authors:  India G Hook-Barnard; Deborah M Hinton
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2007

10.  Programming gene expression with combinatorial promoters.

Authors:  Robert Sidney Cox; Michael G Surette; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rapid Verification of Terminators Using the pGR-Blue Plasmid and Golden Gate Assembly.

Authors:  Jace C Bradshaw; Allea Belle Gongola; Nathan S Reyna
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Selection of an efficient promoter and its application in toyocamycin production improvement in Streptomyces diastatochromogenes 1628.

Authors:  Xianhao Xu; Juan Wang; Andreas Bechthold; Zheng Ma; Xiaoping Yu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  UDP-Glucose Dehydrogenases: Identification, Expression, and Function Analyses in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).

Authors:  Tingting Jia; Qun Ge; Shuya Zhang; Zhen Zhang; Aiying Liu; Senmiao Fan; Xiao Jiang; Yulong Feng; Lipeng Zhang; Doudou Niu; Shen Huang; Wankui Gong; Youlu Yuan; Haihong Shang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Rapid generation of hypomorphic mutations.

Authors:  Laura L Arthur; Joyce J Chung; Preetam Jankirama; Kathryn M Keefer; Igor Kolotilin; Slavica Pavlovic-Djuranovic; Douglas L Chalker; Vojislava Grbic; Rachel Green; Rima Menassa; Heather L True; James B Skeath; Sergej Djuranovic
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Expression and Secretion of Cyan Fluorescent Protein (CFP) in B. subtilis using the Chitinase Promoter from Bacillus pumilus SG2

Authors:  Abbas Shali; Garshasb Rigi; Majid Pornour; Gholamreza Ahmadian
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2017-05-18

6.  PromoterPredict: sequence-based modelling of Escherichia coli σ70 promoter strength yields logarithmic dependence between promoter strength and sequence.

Authors:  Ramit Bharanikumar; Keshav Aditya R Premkumar; Ashok Palaniappan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Quantifying dynamic mechanisms of auto-regulation in Escherichia coli with synthetic promoter in response to varying external phosphate levels.

Authors:  Cansu Uluşeker; Jesús Torres-Bacete; José L García; Martin M Hanczyc; Juan Nogales; Ozan Kahramanoğulları
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.