Frederik A Verburg1, Uwe Mäder, Christoph Reiners, Heribert Hänscheid. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine (F.A.V., C.R., H.H.), and Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken (U.M.), University of Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany; and Department of Nuclear Medicine (F.A.V.), RWTH University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Recent trial results have revived interest in low-activity initial (131)I therapy (RIT) of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare different initial (131)I activities for outcome. DESIGN AND SETTING: A database study was performed in a University hospital. PATIENTS: 1298 DTC patients were included (698 low risk, 434 high risk M0, and 136 M1), grouped according to ablation activity (I, ≤ 2000 MBq [54 mCi]; II, 2000-3000 MBq [54-81 mCi]; and III, >3000 MBq [81 mCi]), subdivided by age (<45 and ≥ 45 y at diagnosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete remission (CR, defined as thyroglobulin [Tg] below functional sensitivity combined with visually negative (131)I diagnostic whole-body scintigraphy), recurrence, DTC-specific mortality, and relative survival rates were studied. RESULTS: Low-risk patients: In patients <45 years, a lower median cumulative activity was required to achieve CR in group III (3590 MBq) than in groups I (8050 MBq) and II (6300 MBq). In patients at least 45 years of age, DTC-specific mortality was significantly higher in group I than in groups II and III (15-y: 16.1 ± 7.7%, 0.8 ± 0.8%, and 7.2 ± 5.5%, respectively; P = .004). High-risk M0 patients: In patients at least 45 years of age, the recurrence rate (15-y: 44.4 ± 16.6%, 24.1 ± 7.6%, and 8.6 ± 3.9%; P = .001) and DTC-specific mortality (15-y: 51.8 ± 15.8%, 13.2 ± 4.4%, and 9.5 ± 3.7%; P = .004) were significantly higher in group I than in groups II and III. M1 patients: There were no significant differences in survival results between different activity groups in either age category. CONCLUSION: Before adopting low initial activity RIT for, especially older, low-risk patients, results of long-term followup should be regarded critically. Low-activity RIT in older, high-risk patients is not to be recommended.
CONTEXT: Recent trial results have revived interest in low-activity initial (131)I therapy (RIT) of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare different initial (131)I activities for outcome. DESIGN AND SETTING: A database study was performed in a University hospital. PATIENTS: 1298 DTCpatients were included (698 low risk, 434 high risk M0, and 136 M1), grouped according to ablation activity (I, ≤ 2000 MBq [54 mCi]; II, 2000-3000 MBq [54-81 mCi]; and III, >3000 MBq [81 mCi]), subdivided by age (<45 and ≥ 45 y at diagnosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete remission (CR, defined as thyroglobulin [Tg] below functional sensitivity combined with visually negative (131)I diagnostic whole-body scintigraphy), recurrence, DTC-specific mortality, and relative survival rates were studied. RESULTS: Low-risk patients: In patients <45 years, a lower median cumulative activity was required to achieve CR in group III (3590 MBq) than in groups I (8050 MBq) and II (6300 MBq). In patients at least 45 years of age, DTC-specific mortality was significantly higher in group I than in groups II and III (15-y: 16.1 ± 7.7%, 0.8 ± 0.8%, and 7.2 ± 5.5%, respectively; P = .004). High-risk M0 patients: In patients at least 45 years of age, the recurrence rate (15-y: 44.4 ± 16.6%, 24.1 ± 7.6%, and 8.6 ± 3.9%; P = .001) and DTC-specific mortality (15-y: 51.8 ± 15.8%, 13.2 ± 4.4%, and 9.5 ± 3.7%; P = .004) were significantly higher in group I than in groups II and III. M1 patients: There were no significant differences in survival results between different activity groups in either age category. CONCLUSION: Before adopting low initial activity RIT for, especially older, low-risk patients, results of long-term followup should be regarded critically. Low-activity RIT in older, high-risk patients is not to be recommended.
Authors: Jérôme Clerc; Frederik A Verburg; Anca M Avram; Luca Giovanella; Elif Hindié; David Taïeb Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: F Pacini; F Basolo; R Bellantone; G Boni; M A Cannizzaro; M De Palma; C Durante; R Elisei; G Fadda; A Frasoldati; L Fugazzola; R Guglielmi; C P Lombardi; P Miccoli; E Papini; G Pellegriti; L Pezzullo; A Pontecorvi; M Salvatori; E Seregni; P Vitti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Frederik A Verburg; Uwe Mäder; Markus Luster; Heribert Hänscheid; Christoph Reiners Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Nicholas S Andresen; John M Buatti; Hamed H Tewfik; Nitin A Pagedar; Carryn M Anderson; John M Watkins Journal: Eur Thyroid J Date: 2017-03-23