Tobias Raupach1, Ghada Al-Harbi2, Ann McNeill3, Alex Bobak4, Andy McEwen5. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK; Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; raupach@med.uni-goettingen.de. 2. Department of Service Development and Health Promotion, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar; 3. National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, London,UK; 4. Wandsworth Medical Centre, London, UK; 5. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK; National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training, London, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is one of the most cost-effective of all health interventions. Physicians are in a strong position to encourage smokers to make a quit attempt and to help them achieve long-term abstinence. Formal teaching on tobacco-related disease, the evidence base of smoking cessation, and practical skills training regarding cessation advice and counseling are therefore important parts of undergraduate medical education. A survey of U.K. medical schools conducted 11 years ago revealed substantial deficits in the curricular coverage of these topics. This study aimed at establishing whether the situation has improved since then. METHODS: In 2013, all U.K. medical schools were invited to participate in an online survey of their curricular coverage of tobacco addiction and smoking cessation. RESULTS: Of the 33 medical schools, 22 (67%) schools responded. Health effects of smoking were addressed in more than 90% of curricula, and factual knowledge on nicotine addiction and withdrawal symptoms was covered in 50% of curricula. Only 1 in 3 medical schools offered practical skills training in artificial (i.e., role play) or clinical settings, and 50% of schools did not address smoking in summative assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Practical skills training regarding cessation counseling is insufficient at most U.K. medical schools and may have become worse during the last 11 years. Increased curricular coverage-including summative assessments-of these topics would ensure that future physicians are adequately equipped to encourage and support effective evidence-based quit attempts in their patients.
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is one of the most cost-effective of all health interventions. Physicians are in a strong position to encourage smokers to make a quit attempt and to help them achieve long-term abstinence. Formal teaching on tobacco-related disease, the evidence base of smoking cessation, and practical skills training regarding cessation advice and counseling are therefore important parts of undergraduate medical education. A survey of U.K. medical schools conducted 11 years ago revealed substantial deficits in the curricular coverage of these topics. This study aimed at establishing whether the situation has improved since then. METHODS: In 2013, all U.K. medical schools were invited to participate in an online survey of their curricular coverage of tobacco addiction and smoking cessation. RESULTS: Of the 33 medical schools, 22 (67%) schools responded. Health effects of smoking were addressed in more than 90% of curricula, and factual knowledge on nicotine addiction and withdrawal symptoms was covered in 50% of curricula. Only 1 in 3 medical schools offered practical skills training in artificial (i.e., role play) or clinical settings, and 50% of schools did not address smoking in summative assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Practical skills training regarding cessation counseling is insufficient at most U.K. medical schools and may have become worse during the last 11 years. Increased curricular coverage-including summative assessments-of these topics would ensure that future physicians are adequately equipped to encourage and support effective evidence-based quit attempts in their patients.
Authors: Jack E Gibson; Rachael L Murray; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; Ann McNeill Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Gina R Kruse; Nancy A Rigotti; Martin Raw; Ann McNeill; Rachael Murray; Hembadoon Piné-Abata; Asaf Bitton; Andy McEwen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Hela Ghali; Habiba Ben Sik Ali; Asma Ben Cheikh; Sana Bhiri; Salwa Khefacha; Mohamed Ben Rejeb; Houyem Said Laatiri Journal: Tunis Med Date: 2022 fevrier
Authors: Siti Idayu Hasan; Farizah Mohd Hairi; Amer Siddiq Amer Nordin; Mahmoud Danaee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 3.390