INTRODUCTION: To date, several concerns have been raised on the purity of ingredients employed in the manufacturing processes of refill fluids and cartridges, the device functionality, and the quality control of electronic cigarettes. This article reviews analytical methods so far described for the analysis of liquids to detect their chemical components and to investigate the presence of toxicants and carcinogens that can potentially occur as impurities of ingredients or as a consequence of their degradation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on the scientific literature, high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC/DAD) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are most appropriate for determining nicotine and related compounds in fluids and cartridges, whereas LC-MS/MS has been successfully used to determine nitrosamines. Content analyses of glycols have been performed using gas chromatography equipped with flame ionization detector or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), whereas carbonyl and other volatile organic compounds determinations have been performed by HPLC/DAD and GC/MS, respectively. Content analyses of heavy metals have been performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Since new potentially toxic substances may be created during heating, it is also necessary to investigate the chemical composition of generated aerosol. In this case, similar methods applied for tobacco smoke can be adopted. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of analytical techniques are available for the detection of constituents and toxicants in e-liquids and cartridges. Analyses of liquids have been performed with pharmacopeia procedures and methods (International Organization for Standardization, Environmental Protection Agency, and American Public Health Association) developed for other matrices but applicable to e-liquids. Because new potentially harmful substances may be produced during heating process, analyses of aerosol are needed to correlate its composition to the chemical components of liquids.
INTRODUCTION: To date, several concerns have been raised on the purity of ingredients employed in the manufacturing processes of refill fluids and cartridges, the device functionality, and the quality control of electronic cigarettes. This article reviews analytical methods so far described for the analysis of liquids to detect their chemical components and to investigate the presence of toxicants and carcinogens that can potentially occur as impurities of ingredients or as a consequence of their degradation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on the scientific literature, high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC/DAD) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are most appropriate for determining nicotine and related compounds in fluids and cartridges, whereas LC-MS/MS has been successfully used to determine nitrosamines. Content analyses of glycols have been performed using gas chromatography equipped with flame ionization detector or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), whereas carbonyl and other volatile organic compounds determinations have been performed by HPLC/DAD and GC/MS, respectively. Content analyses of heavy metals have been performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Since new potentially toxic substances may be created during heating, it is also necessary to investigate the chemical composition of generated aerosol. In this case, similar methods applied for tobacco smoke can be adopted. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of analytical techniques are available for the detection of constituents and toxicants in e-liquids and cartridges. Analyses of liquids have been performed with pharmacopeia procedures and methods (International Organization for Standardization, Environmental Protection Agency, and American Public Health Association) developed for other matrices but applicable to e-liquids. Because new potentially harmful substances may be produced during heating process, analyses of aerosol are needed to correlate its composition to the chemical components of liquids.
Authors: Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz; Jakub Knysak; Michal Gawron; Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Jolanta Kurek; Adam Prokopowicz; Magdalena Jablonska-Czapla; Czeslawa Rosik-Dulewska; Christopher Havel; Peyton Jacob; Neal Benowitz Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Chris Bullen; Jonathan Williman; Colin Howe; Murray Laugesen; Hayden McRobbie; Varsha Parag; Natalie Walker Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lamberto Manzoli; Carlo La Vecchia; Maria Elena Flacco; Lorenzo Capasso; Valentina Simonetti; Stefania Boccia; Angela Di Baldassarre; Paolo Villari; Andrea Mezzetti; Giancarlo Cicolini Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pebbles Fagan; Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Eric T Moolchan; Kevin D Cassel; Adrian A Franke; Xingnan Li; Ian Pagano; Dennis R Trinidad; Kari-Lyn K Sakuma; Kymberle Sterling; Dorothy Jorgensen; Tania Lynch; Crissy Kawamoto; Mignonne C Guy; Ian Lagua; Sarah Hanes; Linda A Alexander; Mark S Clanton; Camonia Graham-Tutt; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ryan F LeBouf; Dru A Burns; Anand Ranpara; Kathleen Attfield; Leonard Zwack; Aleksandr B Stefaniak Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Michael D Crenshaw; Margaret E Tefft; Stephanie S Buehler; Marielle C Brinkman; Pamela I Clark; Sydney M Gordon Journal: Magn Reson Chem Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Anita R Iskandar; Ignacio Gonzalez-Suarez; Shoaib Majeed; Diego Marescotti; Alain Sewer; Yang Xiang; Patrice Leroy; Emmanuel Guedj; Carole Mathis; Jean-Pierre Schaller; Patrick Vanscheeuwijck; Stefan Frentzel; Florian Martin; Nikolai V Ivanov; Manuel C Peitsch; Julia Hoeng Journal: Toxicol Mech Methods Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 2.987