OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and diagnostic performance of reverse attenuation gradient (RAG) sign in patients with coronary stent occlusion. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with suspected restenosis who underwent both coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 2 weeks. Stent occlusion at CCTA was defined as (1) complete contrast filling defect of large calibre stents (at least 3 mm), or (2) presence of RAG sign in patients with small calibre stents (less than 3 mm) or (3) presence of RAG sign in patients with non-diagnostic image quality of stents. The diagnostic performance of RAG sign was further assessed by comparison to ICA results. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with 231 implanted stents were included. ICA confirmed stent occlusion in 59 patients (99 stents). RAG sign was present in 59.3% (35/59) of all stent occlusions. As shown by patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of our diagnostic criteria for detection of stent occlusion were 79.7% (47/59), 100% (103/103), 100% (47/47) and 89.6% (103/115) respectively. Superior diagnostic performance was confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with an area under the curve of 0.898. CONCLUSIONS: RAG sign observed at CCTA in patients with coronary stenting represents reverse collateral flow distal to stents and is highly specific to indicate stent occlusion. KEY POINTS: • RAG sign in patients with previous stents represents retrograde collateral flow. • RAG sign in patients with previous stents indicates stent occlusion. • RAG sign improves detection of stent occlusion in small calibre stents.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and diagnostic performance of reverse attenuation gradient (RAG) sign in patients with coronary stent occlusion. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients with suspected restenosis who underwent both coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 2 weeks. Stent occlusion at CCTA was defined as (1) complete contrast filling defect of large calibre stents (at least 3 mm), or (2) presence of RAG sign in patients with small calibre stents (less than 3 mm) or (3) presence of RAG sign in patients with non-diagnostic image quality of stents. The diagnostic performance of RAG sign was further assessed by comparison to ICA results. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with 231 implanted stents were included. ICA confirmed stent occlusion in 59 patients (99 stents). RAG sign was present in 59.3% (35/59) of all stent occlusions. As shown by patient-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of our diagnostic criteria for detection of stent occlusion were 79.7% (47/59), 100% (103/103), 100% (47/47) and 89.6% (103/115) respectively. Superior diagnostic performance was confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with an area under the curve of 0.898. CONCLUSIONS: RAG sign observed at CCTA in patients with coronary stenting represents reverse collateral flow distal to stents and is highly specific to indicate stent occlusion. KEY POINTS: • RAG sign in patients with previous stents represents retrograde collateral flow. • RAG sign in patients with previous stents indicates stent occlusion. • RAG sign improves detection of stent occlusion in small calibre stents.
Authors: I Bossi; C Klersy; A J Black; R Cortina; R Choussat; B Cassagneau; C Jordan; J C Laborde; J P Laurent; M Bernies; J Fajadet; J Marco Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Joanne D Schuijf; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; J Wouter Jukema; Erica Maffei; Lucia J Kroft; Alessandro Palumbo; Diego Ardissino; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Ernst E Van der Wall; Pim J de Feyter; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Mehran; G Dangas; A S Abizaid; G S Mintz; A J Lansky; L F Satler; A D Pichard; K M Kent; G W Stone; M B Leon Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jin-Ho Choi; James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Fay Y Lin; Dorinna D Mendoza; Dae Hee Shin; Nikki S Ariaratnam; Sunaina Koduru; Juan F Granada; Thomas C Gerber; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Yeon Hyeon Choe Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-11
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Stephen G Ellis; David A Cox; James Hermiller; Charles O'Shaughnessy; James Tift Mann; Mark Turco; Ronald Caputo; Patrick Bergin; Joel Greenberg; Jeffrey J Popma; Mary E Russell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph Stettler; Simon Wandel; Sabin Allemann; Adnan Kastrati; Marie Claude Morice; Albert Schömig; Matthias E Pfisterer; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; José Suarez de Lezo; Jean-Jacques Goy; Seung-Jung Park; Manel Sabaté; Maarten J Suttorp; Henning Kelbaek; Christian Spaulding; Maurizio Menichelli; Paul Vermeersch; Maurits T Dirksen; Pavel Cervinka; Anna Sonia Petronio; Alain J Nordmann; Peter Diem; Bernhard Meier; Marcel Zwahlen; Stephan Reichenbach; Sven Trelle; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321