Literature DB >> 25257681

Significance of asymmetrical posteromedial and posterolateral femoral condylar chamfer cuts in total knee arthroplasty.

Harun R Gungor1, Nusret Ok, Kadir Agladioglu, Semih Akkaya, Esat Kiter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Orthopedic surgeons remove more bone from the posteromedial femoral condyle than the posterolateral condyle to achieve the desired femoral component rotation. Here, the correlation between the asymmetry of chamfer cuts and femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty was determined.
METHODS: A model was built to simulate anterior chamfer cuts performed during total knee arthroplasty to measure posterior condylar offset. Right knee axial magnetic resonance imaging slices were examined from 280 consecutive patients (142 men, 138 women; mean age 31.4 ± 6.6 years). The anatomic and surgical transepicondylar axes, as well as the posterior condylar joint line, were drawn. Differences in the posteromedial and posterolateral offsets and the femoral rotation angles relative to the posterior joint line were measured.
RESULTS: The mean surgical femoral rotation angle was 4.8° ± 1.2°, and the mean posterior condylar offset difference was 4.4 ± 1 mm, with a strong correlation (p < 0.0001; r = 0.803). There was no statistically significant difference between genders. Linear regression analyses revealed that a 0.8-mm difference between the anteroposterior dimensions of the medial and lateral posterior condylar offsets corresponded to 1° of femoral external rotation (p < 0.0001, R (2) = 0.645).
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the applied technique intra-operatively can be verified by correlating the asymmetry of posterior chamfer cuts with the achieved femoral component rotation, as determined by measuring the thicknesses of posterior chamfer cuts with a caliper. Technical errors can also be minimized by confirming the association between the femoral component rotation-as predicted by the posterior condylar offset difference-and the preoperatively measured femoral rotation angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25257681     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3342-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  PCL balancing, an example of the need to couple detailed biomechanical parameters with clinical functional outcome.

Authors:  P J C Heesterbeek; A B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kouichi Kanekasu; Makoto Kondo; Yoshinori Kadoya
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jose Romero; Thomas Stähelin; Chistoph Binkert; Christian Pfirrmann; Jurg Hodler; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert A Siston; Jay J Patel; Stuart B Goodman; Scott L Delp; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Less femoral lift-off and better femoral alignment in TKA using computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Han-Jun Lee; Ho-Joong Jung; Jae Sung Lee; Ki Seong Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Posterior condylar cartilage may distort rotational alignment of the femoral component based on posterior condylar axis in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tadashi Fujii; Makoto Kondo; Kazuhide Tomari; Yoshinori Kadoya; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Accuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Namık Sahin; Teoman Atıcı; Alpaslan Öztürk; Güven Özkaya; Yüksel Özkan; Bülent Avcu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J G Boldt; J B Stiehl; J Hodler; M Zanetti; U Munzinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Evaluation of the flexion gap by axial radiography of the distal femur.

Authors:  Y Tokuhara; Y Kadoya; K Kanekasu; M Kondo; A Kobayashi; K Takaoka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Posterior reference guides do not always maintain the size of posterior femoral condyles in TKA.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Shigekazu Mizokawa; Yoichi Ohta; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Maki Itokazu; Kazumasa Yamamura; Suguru Nakamura; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comment on: Measurement of the knee joint line in Turkish population.

Authors:  Harun R Gungor; Nusret Ok; Kadir Agladioglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.511

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.