Literature DB >> 26194118

Posterior reference guides do not always maintain the size of posterior femoral condyles in TKA.

Yukihide Minoda1, Shigekazu Mizokawa2, Yoichi Ohta2, Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi2, Maki Itokazu2, Kazumasa Yamamura2, Suguru Nakamura2, Hiroaki Nakamura2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Posterior reference guides are provided by many manufacturers. However, the true posterior femoral condyle bone resection thicknesses using posterior reference guides are not stated by the manufacturers. The purpose of this study was to analyse the influence of the posterior reference guide designs on the posterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness.
METHODS: Thickness of posterior femoral condyle bone resection and thickness of prostheses were investigated in 8 types of total knee prostheses using the production drawings provided by the manufacturers.
RESULTS: Posterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness differed between prostheses. Change in size of the medial posterior condyle ranged from -0.5 to 1.4 mm at 0° external rotation, from -2.9 to 1.4 mm at 3° external rotation, and from -5.3 to 1.4 mm at 6° external rotation. Change in size of lateral posterior condyle ranged from -0.5 to 1.4 mm at 0° external rotation, from -0.4 to 3.4 mm at 3° external rotation, and from -0.4 to 5.3 mm at 6° external rotation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that posterior femoral condyle bone resection thickness was different for each posterior reference guide. The rotation centre of posterior reference guides influenced the bone resection thickness in the posterior femoral condyle. The size of the posterior femoral condyles increased in some guides but decreased in other guides. The maximum differences in size changes of the posterior femoral condyles between the guides were 1.9 mm at 0° external rotation, 4.1 mm at 3° external rotation, and 6.3 mm at 6° external rotation. To control the size of posterior femoral condyles, the posterior reference guide design should be checked before use.

Keywords:  Posterior femoral condyle; Posterior reference guide; Rotation of femoral component; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26194118     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3706-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap.

Authors:  Y Kadoya; A Kobayashi; T Komatsu; S Nakagawa; Y Yamano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Computer guided restoration of joint line and femoral offset in cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam M Shetty; Arun Mullaji; Sagar Bhayde
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Surgical technique differences between posterior-substituting and cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Anterior referencing versus posterior referencing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander A Fokin; Richard D Heekin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy Kinsey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The impact of a rectangular or trapezoidal flexion gap on the femoral component rotation in TKA.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Lee; Debabrata Padhy; Jong-Hoon Park; Woong-Kyo Jeong; Ji-Hun Park; Seung-Beom Han
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Can We Use the Posterior Condylar Off set as a Predictive Factor for Overhang of the Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Yoon-Seok Youm; Sung-Do Cho; Jin Eo; Ki-Bong Park; Sun-Ho Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2011-09-26

9.  The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; K E Davis; J B Meding; A Farris
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA.

Authors:  Michel P Bonnin; Axel Schmidt; Luca Basiglini; Nadine Bossard; Emmanuelle Dantony
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  2 in total

1.  Anatomical evaluation of the femoral attachment of the posterior oblique ligament.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Yosuke Hamamoto; Ryuzo Arai; Shinichiro Nakamura; Kohei Nishitani; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Preoperative Virtual Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery Using a Computed Tomography-based 3-dimensional Model With Variation in Reference Points and Target Alignment to Predict Femoral Component Sizing.

Authors:  Shojiro Ishibashi; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Shinya Kawahara; Hidetoshi Tsushima; Yukio Akasaki; Yasuharu Nakashima
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.