| Literature DB >> 25257652 |
R Callaby1, O Hanotte2, I Conradie Van Wyk3, H Kiara4, P Toye4, M N Mbole-Kariuki5, A Jennings6, S M Thumbi7, J A W Coetzer3, B M de C Bronsvoort8, S A Knott1, M E J Woolhouse1, L E B Kruuk9.
Abstract
Parasite burden varies widely between individuals within a population, and can covary with multiple aspects of individual phenotype. Here we investigate the sources of variation in faecal strongyle eggs counts, and its association with body weight and a suite of haematological measures, in a cohort of indigenous zebu calves in Western Kenya, using relatedness matrices reconstructed from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes. Strongyle egg count was heritable (h(2) = 23.9%, s.e. = 11.8%) and we also found heritability of white blood cell counts (WBC) (h(2) = 27.6%, s.e. = 10.6%). All the traits investigated showed negative phenotypic covariances with strongyle egg count throughout the first year: high worm counts were associated with low values of WBC, red blood cell count, total serum protein and absolute eosinophil count. Furthermore, calf body weight at 1 week old was a significant predictor of strongyle EPG at 16-51 weeks, with smaller calves having a higher strongyle egg count later in life. Our results indicate a genetic basis to strongyle EPG in this population, and also reveal consistently strong negative associations between strongyle infection and other important aspects of the multivariate phenotype.Entities:
Keywords: haematology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25257652 PMCID: PMC5844460 DOI: 10.1017/S0031182014001498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitology ISSN: 0031-1820 Impact factor: 3.234
Variance components (± s.e.) for all traits considered in univariate repeated measures models which include calf age and sex as fixed effects and V, V and V as a random effect
| Trait | Number of observations | Mean (± | Sex effect estimate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongyle EPG | 4032 | 542·72 ± 15·79 | 0·06 ± 0·03 | 0·45 ± 0·23 | 0·08 ± 0·22 | 1·30 ± 0·03 | 23·92 ± 11·83 | 4·32 ± 11·53 | 31·44 ± 2·16 | 0·23 ± 0·08 |
| WBC (× 103
| 4693 | 11·08 ± 3·44 | 0·22 ± 0·15 | 3·15 ± 1·22 | 0·86 ± 1·17 | 7·17 ± 0·16 | 27·63 ± 10·56 | 7·54 ± 10·28 | 37·17 ± 1·97 | − 0·15 ± 0·21 |
| RBC (× 106
| 4281 | 8·79 ± 2·03 | 0·12 ± 0·06 | 0·57 ± 0·41 | 0·60 ± 0·04 | 1·95 ± 0·04 | 17·60 ± 12·46 | 18·50 ± 12·36 | 39·68 ± 2·10 | − 0·26 ± 0·11 |
| TSP (g dL− 1) | 4721 | 7·98 ± 0·90 | 2·56 × 10−3 ± 3·15 × 10−3 | 0·07 ± 0·04 | 0·03 ± 0·04 | 0·38 ± 0·01 | 14·50 ± 8·20 | 7·05 ± 8·09 | 22·08 ± 1·63 | − 0·04 ± 0·04 |
| EO | 3690 | 0·14 ± 0·14 | 1·71e− 4 ± 1·12e− 4 | 9·44e− 5 ± 8·78e− 4 | 1·74e− 3 ± 9·14e− 4 | 1·57e− 2 ± 3·89e− 4 | 0·53 ± 4·97 | 9·84 ± 5·15 | 11·34 ± 1·44 | − 0·01 ± 0·01 |
| Weight | 3338 | 1·55 ± 0.18 | 4·19e− 4 ± 2·41e− 4 | 1·91e− 3 ± 1·87e− 3 | 4·46e− 3 ± 1·87e− 3 | 2·92e− 3 ± 7·69e− 5 | 19·64 ± 19·22 | 45·93 ± 19·06 | 69·89 ± 1·67 | 0·02 ± 0·01 |
The proportion of total variance (V) explained by the permanent environment variance (V) is also presented. The total number of calves for each trait is 446. EO, transformed EO (× 103 μL− 1, log10(EO + 1)); weight, transformed body weight (kg, log10(weight)); V, sublocation variance; V, additive genetic variance; V, permanent environment variance; V, residual variance; h2, heritability; V/V (%), proportion of the total phenotypic variance explained by the permanent environment variance expressed as a percentage; r2, repeatability; sex effect estimate, the effect estimate of being male.
Fig. 1Distribution of strongyle EPG (box plots, left-hand axis) and the fraction of calves which tested positive at each age (right-hand axis). The black heavy solid lines in each box are the median EPG at each age group, the bottom and top of the box represent the 25th and 95th percentiles, respectively, and the whiskers represent 1·5 times the interquartile range. Points beyond the whiskers are outliers. Strongyle EPG is transformed as log10(strongyle EPG + 50). The solid grey line represents the fraction of tested calves positive for strongyle eggs at each age.
Fig. 2Percentage of variance explained by each component for all traits investigated. Details of the full model (including SEs on variance component estimates) are given in Table 1. Strongyle EPG uses an animal model fitted with a negative binomial distribution model. WBC, white blood cell count (× 103μL−1); RBC, red blood cell count (× 106μL−1); TSP, total serum protein (g dL−1); EO, transformed absolute eosinophil count (× 103 μL−1, log10(EO + 1)); body weight, transformed body weight (kg, log10(weight)).
The effect of a high or low strongyle EPG at a given age on the trait of interest, using univariate animal models
| Trait | WBC | RBC | TSP | |||||||||
| Estimate | Estimate | F | Estimate | F | ||||||||
| Intercept | 9·676 | 0·217 | 8049·50 | < 0·001 | 10·560 | 0·124 | 10999·24 | < 0·001 | 9·690 | 0·041 | 200000·00 | < 0·001 |
| High strongyle EPG | − 0·471 | 0·102 | 0·35 | 0·550 | − 0·362 | 0·054 | 236·11 | < 0·001 | − 0·090 | 0·023 | 646·29 | < 0·001 |
| Sex (effect of being male) | − 0·046 | 0·210 | 0·05 | 0·819 | − 0·224 | 0·111 | 4·04 | 0·047 | − 0·034 | 0·036 | 0·88 | 0·349 |
| Calf age (11 factor levels) | NA | NA | 25·94 | < 0·001 | NA | NA | 184·00 | < 0·001 | NA | NA | 269·40 | < 0·001 |
| Trait | EO | Weight | ||||||||||
| Estimate | Estimate | |||||||||||
| Intercept | 0·055 | 0·009 | 1166·54 | < 0·001 | 1·267 | 0·008 | 72274·08 | < 0·001 | ||||
| High strongyle EPG | − 0·007 | 0·005 | 10·96 | 0·001 | − 0·015 | 0·003 | 3579·83 | < 0·001 | ||||
| Sex (effect of being male) | − 0·009 | 0·006 | 2·22 | 0·14 | 0·018 | 0·008 | 5·44 | 0·021 | ||||
| Calf age (11 factor levels) | NA | NA | 37·15 | < 0·001 | NA | NA | 2682·21 | < 0·001 | ||||
A high EPG is defined as being above the median strongyle EPG whilst a low EPG is defined as being below the median strongyle EPG. The median is the overall median taken across all visits. The significance is given by the Wald F statistic. NA, not applicable, as multiple factor level estimates are not reported.
Association between strongyle EPG in older calves (aged 16–51 weeks old) and the calf ’s weight at the recruitment visit (calf aged <1 week), using a univariate animal model.
| Variable | Estimate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Calf weight at recruitment (kg) | −0·030 | 0·012 | 0·011 |
| Calf sex (effect of being male) | 0·276 | 0·087 | 0·006 |
| Calf age (7 factor levels) | NA | NA | 0·185 |
Covariance/variance/correlation matrix for the between-individual and residual (within-individual) level variance between strongyle EPG and trait
| Strongyle EPG | WBC | RBC | TSP | EO | Body weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual level variance | ||||||
| Strongyle EPG | | − 0·120 (0·068) | − 0·386 (0·062) | − 0·192 (0·075) | − 0·140 (0·098) | − 0·182 (0·060) |
| WBC | − 0·204 (0·118) | | 0·133 (0·064) | 0·284 (0·068) | 0·468 (0·079) | 0·280 (0·054) |
| RBC | − 0·355 (0·067) | 0·336 (0·168) | | 0·251 (0·069) | 0·138 (0·092) | 0·399 (0·050) |
| TSP | − 0·046 (0·019) | 0·188 (0·049) | 0·090 (0·027) | | 0·030 (0·104) | 0·273 (0·061) |
| EO | − 0·005 (0·004) | 0·048 (0·010) | 0·008 (0·005) | 0·0004 (0·001) | | 0·368 (0·077) |
| Body weight | − 0·013 (0·004) | 0·053 (0·011) | 0·041 (0·006) | 0·007 (0·002) | 0·002 (0·0003) | |
| Residual level variance | ||||||
| Strongyle EPG | | − 0·095 (0·025) | − 0·140 (0·025) | − 0·124 (0·025) | − 0·022 (0·026) | − 0·137 (0·025) |
| WBC | − 0·255 (0·069) | | 0·345 (0·023) | 0·152 (0·025) | 0·246 (0·024) | 0·126 (0·026) |
| RBC | − 0·214 (0·040) | 1·262 (0·101) | | 0·265 (0·024) | 0·082 (0·026) | 0·209 (0·025) |
| TSP | − 0·067 (0·014) | 0·199 (0·034) | 0·196 (0·020) | | 0·032 (0·026) | 0·182 (0·025) |
| EO | − 0·003 (0·003) | 0·078 (0·009) | 0·015 (0·005) | 0·002 (0·002) | | 0·018 (0·026) |
| Body weight | − 0·007 (0·001) | 0·016 (0·003) | 0·015 (0·002) | 0·005 (0·001) | 0·0001 (0·0002) | |
Covariances are shown below the diagonal (in italics), the associated correlations above the diagonal and variances on the diagonal. Standard errors are in brackets. WBC, white blood cell count (− 103 μL−1); RBC, red blood cell count (× 106 μL−1); TSP, total serum protein (gdL−1); EO, transformed absolute eosinophil count (× 103 μL−1, log10(EO + 1)); body weight, transformed body weight (kg, log10(weight)).