B Morquette1, P Morquette2, J Agostinone1, E Feinstein3, R A McKinney4, A Kolta5, A Di Polo1. 1. 1] Department of Neuroscience, CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada [2] University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CR-CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada [3] Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. 1] Department of Neuroscience, CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada [2] Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Quark Pharmaceuticals Inc., Research Division, Ness Ziona, Israel. 4. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 5. 1] Department of Neuroscience, CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada [2] Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada [3] Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
Dendritic defects occur in neurodegenerative diseases accompanied by axonopathy, yet the mechanisms that regulate these pathologic changes are poorly understood. Using Thy1-YFPH mice subjected to optic nerve axotomy, we demonstrate early retraction of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendrites and selective loss of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity, which precede soma loss. Axonal injury triggered rapid upregulation of the stress-induced protein REDD2 (regulated in development and DNA damage response 2), a potent inhibitor of mTOR. Short interfering RNA-mediated REDD2 knockdown restored mTOR activity and rescued dendritic length, area and branch complexity in a rapamycin-dependent manner. Whole-cell recordings demonstrated that REDD2 depletion leading to mTOR activation in RGCs restored their light response properties. Lastly, we show that REDD2-dependent mTOR activity extended RGC survival following axonal damage. These results indicate that injury-induced stress leads to REDD2 upregulation, mTOR inhibition and dendrite pathology causing neuronal dysfunction and subsequent cell death.
Dendritic defects occur in neurodegenerative diseases accompanied by axonopathy, yet the mechanisms that regulate these pathologic changes are poorly understood. Using Thy1-YFPH mice subjected to optic nerve axotomy, we demonstrate early retraction of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendrites and selective loss of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity, which precede soma loss. Axonal injury triggered rapid upregulation of the stress-induced protein REDD2 (regulated in development and DNA damage response 2), a potent inhibitor of mTOR. Short interfering RNA-mediated REDD2 knockdown restored mTOR activity and rescued dendritic length, area and branch complexity in a rapamycin-dependent manner. Whole-cell recordings demonstrated that REDD2 depletion leading to mTOR activation in RGCs restored their light response properties. Lastly, we show that REDD2-dependent mTOR activity extended RGC survival following axonal damage. These results indicate that injury-induced stress leads to REDD2 upregulation, mTOR inhibition and dendrite pathology causing neuronal dysfunction and subsequent cell death.
During normal neural development there is selective elimination of dendritic and
axonal branches without loss of the neuron itself.[1] This developmental pruning refines neuronal processes and
ensures precise connectivity. Most of our current knowledge about structural changes
in dendrites stems from studies of dendritic remodeling during
development.[2,3] In contrast, little is known about how dendritic arbors
are affected by trauma or disease in the adult central nervous system (CNS). Defects
in dendritic arborization and connectivity are being recognized as one of the first
stages of neurodegeneration. Indeed, dendritic abnormalities and loss of synapses
have been reported in neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and
depression, as well as in neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer's
disease, stroke and glaucoma.[4,5] Despite the fact that dendritic defects are
likely to have devastating consequences on neuronal function and survival, the
mechanisms that regulate dendrite degeneration in mature CNS neurons are poorly
understood.Recent studies have identified the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) as a critical
component of dendritic tree development.[6,
7, 8, 9] A substantial reduction in the number of
dendritic branches and arbor shrinkage were observed in developing hippocampal
neurons when mTOR was inhibited.[6,7] In addition, mTOR has been recently implicated
in the regulation of dendritic spine morphology, synaptogenesis and synaptic
plasticity.[10,11] The emerging developmental role of mTOR in the
regulation of dendritic dynamics prompted us to put forward the hypothesis that
dysregulation of mTOR function might contribute to dendritic pathology in adult
neurons following injury.Many of the signals that impinge upon mTOR activity act through the tuberous
sclerosis complex (TSC1/2), a negative regulator of mTOR function. For instance,
stress signals such as hypoxia and energy depletion activate TSC1/2 through the
REDD (regulated in development and DNA damage response) proteins,[12, 13, 14] leading to the loss of mTOR activity. REDD2,
a member of this family also known as DDIT4L or RTP801L, is an attractive target
because in addition to being a potent mTOR inhibitor, it is implicated in stress
responses leading to cell death.[15,16] Although REDD2 is enriched in skeletal muscle
and has been shown to inhibit mTOR signaling in response to leucine and
stretch,[17] its expression and
function in the nervous system is currently unknown.We used a model of acute optic nerve lesion in vivo to ask whether axonal
damage had a direct effect on retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dendrite morphology and,
if so, to identify the molecular mechanisms that regulate this injury-induced
response. Our data demonstrate that axonal damage leads to substantial retraction of
RGC dendritic arbors before soma loss. Optic nerve lesion led to selective REDD2
upregulation in RGCs, which coincided with the loss of mTOR activity. Short
interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of REDD2 restored mTOR function in
injured neurons and fully rescued their dendritic arbors, increasing dendritic
length, field area and branch complexity. REDD2 depletion also abrogated pathologic
RGC hyperexcitability and restored the light response properties of these neurons.
Collectively, these data identify the REDD2-mTOR signaling pathway as a critical
regulator of dendritic arbor morphology in adult central neurons undergoing axonal
damage.
Results
RGC dendritic arbors retract soon after axonal injury and before cell
death
To establish whether axonal injury induces structural changes in RGC
dendrites, we carried out a detailed analysis of dendritic arbors in
transgenic mice that selectively express yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in
RGCs under control of the Thy1 promoter (Thy1-YFPH).[18] In this mouse strain, RGC-specific
YFP expression is detected in a small number of RGCs (<1%), thus
allowing visualization of individual dendritic arbors without interference
from overlapping dendrites in neighboring neurons. A key question is to
determine whether dendritic atrophy is a prerequisite or a consequence of
RGC soma degeneration. For this purpose, we first established the time
course of axotomy-induced RGC loss in Thy1-YFPH mice. Figure 1a shows that at 3 days after complete optic nerve
axotomy, the intensity of the YFP label or the number of YFP-positive RGCs
did not differ from those in non-injured (intact) retinas (injured:
63±4 RGCs; intact: 66±4 RGCs, mean±S.E.M., analysis of
variance (ANOVA), P>0.05; Table 1),
whereas at 5 days after lesion there was substantial neuronal loss
accounting for 35% of the RGC population (injured: 44±3 RGCs,
ANOVA, P<0.001). This time course of injury-induced RGC death
was confirmed using an antibody against the transcription factor Brn3a, an
RGC-specific marker[19] (Figure 1b). Therefore, analysis of dendritic arbors
was carried out at 3 days after axotomy, a time when no changes in the
intensity or number of YFP-labeled RGCs were observed, and before overt
neuronal soma loss.
Figure 1
RGC dendritic arbors retract soon after axonal injury and prior to cell
death. (a) Quantitative analysis of RGC densities showed no
significant change in the number of YFP-positive RGCs at 3 days after
axotomy, whereas substantial neuronal loss was observed at 5 days after
lesion (axotomy 3 days: n=7; axotomy 5 days:
n=4). (b) A similar pattern of RGC loss was observed
using the RGC-specific marker Brn3a (n=3). The density of
RGCs in intact, uninjured retinas is shown as reference
(n=11). Data are expressed as mean±S.E.M. (ANOVA,
***P<0.001, n=3–11 mice
per group). (c–e) YFP-positive RGCs that colabeled with
an antibody against NF-H and had clearly identifiable axons (arrow) were
selected for dendritic arbor imaging and reconstruction. Scale bar:
25 μm. (f and g) Three days after
axotomy, RGCs had visibly smaller dendritic arbors than non-injured, intact
neurons (axotomy: n=21 cells; intact: n=17
cells). Quantitative analysis of dendritic parameters revealed a significant
reduction in total dendritic length (h), dendritic field area
(i) and arbor complexity (j, Sholl analysis). Values are
expressed as mean±S.E.M. (Student's t-test,
**P<0.005, *P<0.05, cells were
analyzed from 5 mice per group)
Table 1
Number of animals (N) used per experiment
Group
Treatment
N
Figure no.
RGC survival analysis (YFP)
Intact
11
1a
Axotomy (3 days)
7
1a
Axotomy (5 days)
4
1a
RGC survival analysis (Brn3a)
Intact
11
1b
Axotomy (3 days)
3
1b
Axotomy (5 days)
3
1b
Immunohistochemistry (NF-H+YFP)
Intact
7
1c–e
Dendritic arbor analysis
Intact
5
1h–j
Axotomy (3 days)
5
1h–j
Immunohistochemistry (phospho-S6+TUJ1)
Intact
4
2a–i, m, r
Axotomy (3 days)
4
2a–i, n, o–r
Immunohistochemistry (phospho-S6+calbindin)
Intact
3
2j–l, s
Axotomy (3 days)
3
2j–l, s
Immunohistochemistry (REDD2, REDD1)
Intact
3
3a
Axotomy (3 days)
3
3b–k
Western blot analysis (REDD2, REDD1)
Intact
5
3l–n
Axotomy (2 days)
4
3l–n
Axotomy (3 days)
4
3l–n
siRNA uptake (siCtl-Cy3+Fluorogold)
Intact+siCtl-Cy3
4
4a–d
Western blot analysis (REDD2, REDD1)
Axotomy+siCtl
4
4e–g
Axotomy+siREDD2
5
4e–g
Immunohistochemistry (phospho-S6+Brn3a)
Axotomy+siCtl
4
4k–n
Axotomy+siREDD2
4
4h–j, o
Immunohistochemistry (phospho-S6+calbindin)
Axotomy+siCtl
3
4q
Axotomy+siREDD2
3
4q
Dendritic arbor analysis
Axotomy+siCtl
5
5a, d–i
Axotomy+siREDD2
5
5b, d–i
Axotomy+siREDD2+Rapa
4
5c, d–i
Intact+siREDD2
5
5d–i
Intact+rapamycin (Rapa)
5
5d–i
Electrophysiology
Intact
7
6a–h, k, l
Axotomy
5
6f, g, i, k, l
Axotomy+siREDD2
5
6f, g, j, k, l
Axotomy+siCtl
20
N/A
RGC soma analysis
Intact
5
7a
Axotomy+siCtl
5
7a
Axotomy+siREDD2
5
7a
RGC survival analysis (Brn3a)
Axotomy (5 days)+siREDD2
4
7b, f
Axotomy (5 days)+siCtl
3
7c, f
Axotomy (7 days)+siREDD2
5
7d, f
Axotomy (7 days)+siCtl
4
7e, f
Fourteen different morphologic RGC subtypes have been identified in the mouse
retina,[20,21] all of which are found in Thy1-YFPH transgenic
retinas.[21] Neurofilament H
(NF-H, SMI-32) is the only marker that labels several structural classes,
specifically four subtypes identified by cluster analysis,[21] which encompass a significant portion
of the total RGC population (36%: 1213±101
RGCs/mm2). Therefore, YFP-positive RGCs that colabeled
with an antibody against NF-H and had a clearly identifiable axon were
selected for dendritic arbor imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction.
RGCs located in both central and peripheral retina were included in our
analysis and measurements were performed blinded to manipulations.
YFP+/NF-H+ RGCs had medium to large monostratified dendritic
arbors with smooth dendrites lacking spines, a common feature of adult
RGCs[21] (Figures 1c–e). Following axotomy, RGC dendritic arbors
were visibly smaller than those in non-injured, intact neurons (Figures 1f and g). Analysis of total dendritic
length and total dendritic area demonstrated a reduction of 15%
(3707 μm) and 25% (112 ×
103 μm2), respectively,
compared with control RGCs (length: 4320 μm; area: 150
× 103 μm2) (Figures 1h and i and Tables
1 and 2). Sholl analysis, which
measures the number of dendrites that cross-concentric circles at increasing
distances from the soma, revealed a leftward shift indicating a reduced
arbor complexity in axotomized neurons (Figure
1j and Table 2). These changes were
not dependent on retinal location or eccentricity. Our results demonstrate
that RGC dendritic retraction occurs soon after axonal injury and before
cell death in vivo.
Table 2
Dendritic parameters
Group
Treatment
Total dendritic length (μm) (mean±S.E.M.)
Dendritic field area ( × 103μm2) (mean±S.E.M.)
Sholl analysis (area under curve) (mean±S.E.M.)
Number of animals
(N)
Number of RGCs (n)
Intact
—
4391.7±118.0
149.7±10.5
3413.8±128.6
5
17
Intact
siREDD2
4348.4±275.1
170.5±17.5
3138.6±237.7
5
19
Intact
Rapamycin
4225.6±237.1
144.4±20.2
3057.1±241.8
5
17
Axotomy
—
3706.9±190.2
111.8±9.9
2682.0±128.6
5
21
Axotomy
siCtl
3613.6±181.5
108.6±13.8
2565.7±216.4
5
18
Axotomy
siREDD2
4597.5±229.2
163.5±9.7
3713.8±138.5
5
20
Axotomy
siREDD2+Rapamycin
3523.0±185.0
110.8±10.9
2770.0±219.6
4
19
Selective loss of mTOR activity in injured RGCs
mTOR interacts with intracellular partners to regulate several cellular
processes, of which the best characterized is protein synthesis. mTOR
phosphorylates the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K) leading to
phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6, which stimulates mRNA
translation rates.[22] Antibodies
that recognize phosphorylated S6(Ser240/244) are widely
accepted functional readouts of mTOR activity.[23] Therefore, to establish whether RGC dendritic
retraction correlates with changes in mTOR activity in these neurons, we
examined phospho-S6(Ser240/244) expression in intact and
axotomized retinas. Phospho-S6 labeling was detected predominantly in two
retinal cell populations, one located in the ganglion cell layer (GCL) and
another in the outermost part of the inner nuclear layer (INL) (Figure 2a). Double labeling of phospho-S6 with an
antibody against tubulin isoform βIII (TUJ1), a selective
marker for RGCs in the retina,[24,25] revealed that
adult mouse RGC soma and dendrites are endowed with robust mTOR activity
(Figures 2b–i). Phospho-S6 labeling in
the INL colocalized with the calcium-binding protein calbindin, a marker for
horizontal cells (Figures 2j–l).
Figure 2
mTOR activity decreases in injured RGCs. (a) Phospho-S6 labeling was
detected in neurons of the INL and GCL. (b–i) Colabeling
of phospho-S6 with TUJ1, an RGC-specific marker, revealed mTOR activity in
RGC soma and dendrites (arrowhead, i). (j–l)
Phospho-S6 labeling in the INL colocalized with the calcium-binding protein
calbindin, a marker for horizontal cells. (m and n) Loss of
phospho-S6 in RGCs was observed at 3 days after axotomy, before the onset of
cell death, whereas phospho-S6 expression in horizontal cells remained
unchanged. (o–q) Phospho-S6 downregulation reflected
loss of mTOR activity and not RGC death because these neurons were readily
detected with TUJ1. (r) RGCs that expressed both phospho-S6 and TUJ1
with respect to all TUJ1-positive cells decreased after injury. (s)
The number of horizontal cells expressing both phospho-S6 and calbindin did
not change with axotomy. Values are expressed as mean±S.E.M.
(Student's t-test, *P<0.05,
n=3–4 mice per group). Scale bars:
(a–l and
o–q)=25 μm and (m
and n)=50 μm. ONL, outer nuclear layer;
OPL, outer plexiform layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell
layer
A marked decrease in phospho-S6-positive RGCs was observed at 3 days after
axotomy, before the onset of cell death, whereas phospho-S6 expression in
horizontal cells remained unchanged (Figures 2m and
n). Colabeling of axotomized retinas with phospho-S6 and TUJ1
confirmed that phospho-S6 downregulation reflected loss of mTOR activity in
RGCs and not RGC loss (Figures 2o–q).
Quantification of the number of RGCs that expressed both phospho-S6 and TUJ1
with respect to all TUJ1-positive cells demonstrated that ~50% of
RGCs in the intact retina have detectable levels of mTOR activity (Figure 2r and Table 1).
Importantly, optic nerve injury led to 40% decrease in the number of
RGCs expressing phospho-S6 (Figure 2r). In
contrast, the number of horizontal cells expressing both phospho-S6 and
calbindin did not change with axotomy (Figure
2s). These data indicate that selective damage to RGC axons leads
to the downregulation of mTOR activity in these neurons but not in other
retinal cells.
REDD2 is upregulated in injured RGCs
Inhibition of mTOR during stress occurs through stabilization or activation
of the TSC1/TSC2 complex. REDD1 and REDD2 likely inhibit mTOR by
controlling the release of TSC2 from its association with inhibitory
factors, thereby stabilizing the interaction between TSC1 and
TSC2.[26] To test the
hypothesis that REDD2 might be involved in mTOR inhibition in RGCs, we first
examined the expression of REDD2 in intact and axotomized retinas. While low
levels of REDD2 were detected in the GCL of non-injured retinas, a marked
increase in REDD2-positive labeling was observed at 3 days after axotomy
(Figures 3a and b). Colabeling of retinal
sections with REDD2 and the RGC-specific marker Brn3a demonstrated that
REDD2 expression selectively increases in injured RGCs (Figures 3c–e). REDD2 was also observed in the outer
plexiform layer (OPL) and colocalized with horizontal cell proximal
dendrites labeled with calbindin (Figures 3a and
f–h), but there was no detectable change in REDD2
expression in horizontal cell processes after axonal injury (Figures 3b and f–h). REDD1, a family member
that shares 38% homology with REDD2,[27,28] was
selectively expressed in the GCL (Figure 3i).
Colabeling with the RGC-specific marker Brn3a confirmed that RGCs expressed
REDD1 (Figures 3k and l), as reported
previously.[29] REDD2
upregulation in damaged RGCs was confirmed by western blot analysis of
retinal homogenates as early as 48 h after axotomy (Figures 3m and n). In contrast, the expression of
REDD1 did not change after lesion (Figures 3m and
o). These results demonstrate selective injury-induced REDD2
upregulation in RGCs.
Figure 3
REDD2 is upregulated in injured RGCs. (a) Low levels of REDD2 were
detected in the GCL of non-injured retinas. (b) In contrast, a marked
increase in REDD2-positive labeling was observed at 3 days after axotomy.
(c–e) Colabeling with REDD2 and Brn3a demonstrated
that REDD2 upregulation in injured RGCs. (a and
f–h) REDD2 protein expression in the OPL colocalized
with calbindin-positive horizontal cell proximal dendrites.
(i–l) The family member REDD1 was selectively
expressed in the GCL, and colabeling with the RGC-specific marker Brn3a
confirmed its expression by RGCs. (m–o) Western blot and
densitometric analyses demonstrated that REDD2 was upregulated as early as
48 h after axonal damage, whereas REDD1 remained unchanged. The lower
panel represents the same blot as in the upper panels but probed with an
antibody that recognizes β-actin used to confirm equal protein
loading. Axo 48 h, Axo 72 h: analysis performed at 48 or
72 h, respectively, after axotomy. Values are expressed as
mean±S.E.M. (ANOVA, ***P<0.001,
n=3–5 mice per group). Scale bars: (a and
b)=50 μm and
(c–h)=25 μm. ONL, outer
nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL,
inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer
REDD2 knockdown restores mTOR activity
To establish whether REDD2 upregulation mediated loss of mTOR activity in
RGCs, we sought to reduce REDD2 expression by using siRNA followed by
analysis of retinal phospho-S6. First, we examined whether siRNA delivered
intraocularly was taken up by mouse RGCs. A single intravitreal injection of
non-targeting (scrambled) Cy3-tagged control siRNA (siCtl-Cy3) resulted in
Cy3 labeling in RGCs as early as 3 h after administration (Figure 4a). The colocalization of Cy3 and the
retrograde tracer Fluorogold (FG), following FG application to the superior
colliculus, confirmed that siRNA was rapidly taken up by RGCs (Figures 4b–d). Next, we assessed the ability
of siRNAs against REDD2 (siREDD2) to knockdown retinal REDD2 protein
expression in vivo. Western blot analysis of retinal homogenates
from eyes that received siREDD2 at the time of axotomy showed a significant
reduction of REDD2 protein, whereas non-tagged siCtl had no effect (Figures 4e and f). Importantly, siREDD2 did not
reduce the protein levels of REDD1, validating the specificity of this siRNA
(Figures 4e and g). Immunohistochemistry of
axotomized retinas confirmed that REDD2 downregulation occurred in RGCs,
visualized with Brn3a, following treatment with siREDD2 but not siCtl
(Figures 4h–m). We next investigated
whether siRNA-mediated knockdown of REDD2 resulted in recovery of mTOR
function. Axotomized retinas treated with siREDD2 displayed a larger number
of phospho-S6-positive RGCs compared with retinas injected with siCtl
(Figures 4n and o). Quantitative analysis
demonstrated a 45% increase in the number of axotomized RGCs
expressing phospho-S6 in the presence of siREDD2 compared with control
retinas (Figure 4p and Table
1), whereas the number of phospho-S6-positive horizontal cells
did not change (Figure 4q). These data
demonstrate that REDD2 knockdown increases mTOR activity in injured RGCs,
and suggests that axotomy-induced REDD2 upregulation leads to the loss of
mTOR function in these neurons.
Figure 4
REDD2 knockdown restores mTOR activity. (a–d)
Intravitreal delivery of siCtl-Cy3 resulted in rapid and effective uptake by
RGCs, visualized with the retrograde tracer FG. (e and f)
Western blot and densitometric analyses showed that intravitreal delivery of
siRNA against REDD2 (siREDD2) led to a reduction of retinal REDD2 protein,
while siCtl had no effect (Student's t-test,
***P<0.01, n=4–5 mice per
group). (e and g) siREDD2 did not decrease or increase the
protein levels of REDD1, confirming the specificity of the siRNA. The lower
panel represents the same blot as in the upper panels but probed with an
antibody that recognizes β-actin used to confirm equal protein
loading. (h–j) siRNA-mediated knockdown of REDD2
occurred in RGCs, visualized with Brn3a, but not in retinas treated with
siCtl (k–m). (n and o) Axotomized retinas
treated with siREDD2 had more phospho-S6-positive RGCs compared with
siCtl-treated retinas. (p) Quantitative analysis demonstrated a
45% increase in the number of TUJ1-positive axotomized RGCs
expressing phospho-S6 in the presence of siREDD2 compared with control
retinas. The number of phospho-S6-positive horizontal cells did not change
(q). Values are expressed as mean±S.E.M. (Student's
t-test, *P<0.05, n=4 mice per
group). Scale bars:
(a–d)=50 μm;
(h–o)=25 μm. ONL, outer
nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL,
inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer
REDD2-dependent increase in mTOR function rescues dendrites
We asked whether siREDD2-induced upregulation of mTOR activity had an effect
on dendritic arbor structure after axonal injury. Characterization of
neuronal morphology at 3 days after axotomy demonstrated that
siREDD2-treated retinas contained RGCs with longer dendrites and more
elaborate arbors than control retinas treated with siCtl (Figures 5a and b). Coadministration of siREDD2 and rapamycin,
an inhibitor of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1),[30] completely blocked the effect of siREDD2 on
dendritic rescue, suggesting that this response was mTORC1-specific (Figure 5c). Quantitative analysis of dendritic arbor
parameters revealed that siREDD2 protected 32% of the total dendritic
length and 34% of the dendritic field area from injury-induced damage
compared with siCtl or a combination of siREDD2 and rapamycin (Figures 5d and f and Table
2). Administration of siREDD2 or rapamycin alone in
non-injured, intact retinas did not elicit significant changes in dendritic
length or field area (Figures 5e and g).
Dendritic arbor reconstruction and measurements were carried out blinded to
treatments.
Figure 5
REDD2-dependent increase in mTORC1 function rescues dendritic arbors.
(a and b) siREDD2-treated RGCs (n=20
cells) have elaborate arbors with longer dendrites than control neurons
treated with siCtl (n=18 cells). (c) Coadministration
of siREDD2 with rapamycin (Rapa, n=19 cells), an inhibitor
of the mTORC1, blocked the effect of siREDD2 on dendritic morphology
(4–5 mice per group). (d and f) The total dendritic
length and field area increased in siREDD2-treated retinas compared with
controls treated with siCTL or a combination of siREDD2 and rapamycin.
(e and g) Administration of siREDD2 (n=19
cells) or rapamycin alone (n=17 cells) did not elicit
changes in dendritic length or field area of non-injured (intact) neurons
(4–5 mice per group). (h) Analysis of the contribution of
proximal dendrites (orders 1–3) and distal dendrites (orders
4–10) showed that injury-induced changes and the response to siREDD2
occurred primarily in distal dendrites. (i) Sholl analysis revealed
an increase in arbor complexity in axotomized siREDD2-treated RGCs compared
with cells exposed to siCtl or a combination of siREDD2 and rapamycin. All
analyses were performed at 3 days after axotomy. Values are expressed as the
mean±S.E.M. (ANOVA, **P<0.001). See Table 2 for all N values. Scale bars:
(a–c)=50 μm, Axo,
axotomy
To assess the contribution of proximal and distal dendrites to
axotomy-induced changes and the effect of siREDD2, we examined the dendritic
length of proximal dendrites (orders 1–3) compared with distal
dendrites (orders 4–10). This analysis demonstrated that most of the
changes occurring after axotomy and following modulation of the REDD2-mTOR
pathway take place in distal dendrites (Figure
5h). Furthermore, Sholl analysis revealed a rightward shift
indicative of increased arbor complexity in axotomized siREDD2-treated
retinas with respect to axotomized retinas treated with siCtl or a
combination of siREDD2 and rapamycin (Figure
5i). Increased arbor complexity was more apparent at
>100 μm from the cell soma, consistent with
changes taking place in distal dendritic segments. Intriguingly, the
dendritic arbors of injured RGCs that received siREDD2 displayed higher
complexity than those in intact, non-injured retinas without treatment
(Figure 5i, red curve versus black
curve; Table 2). siREDD2 administration to
intact eyes did not alter dendritic arbor complexity (not shown). These data
identify the REDD2–mTORC1 axis as a critical regulator of RGC
dendritic arbor morphology in injured neurons, and provide evidence that
REDD2-dependent increase in mTORC1 activity rescues RGC dendrites after
axotomy.
siREDD2-mediated mTOR activation restores neuronal function
To assess the impact of dendritic arbor rescue on RGC function, we performed
whole-cell recordings from single ON-center RGCs at 3 days after axotomy and
concurrent intraocular injection of siREDD2 or siCtl at the time of injury.
Retinas were placed in the recording chamber with the GCL facing up and
visualized with epifluorescence, to identify YFP-labeled RGCs, as well as
infrared differential interference contrast optics to position the recording
electrode. The identity of each recorded cell and its pattern of dendritic
arborization in the inner plexiform layer was confirmed post hoc
following injection of Alexa Fluor 594 through the recording pipette
(Figures 6a–e). Analysis of RGC
intrinsic properties, including membrane resting potential and resistance,
did not reveal significant differences between intact and axotomized neurons
with or without siREDD2 treatment (Figures 6f and
g). In contrast, light stimulation elicited firing at a much
higher frequency in axotomized RGCs compared with non-injured controls
(intact: 22±6 Hz; axotomy: 61±9 Hz,
mean±S.E.M.; Figures 6h and i).
Remarkably, siREDD2 treatment restored the light-induced firing frequency in
axotomized RGCs to levels similar to those recorded from intact neurons
(axotomy+siREDD2: 22±4 Hz; Figures 6j
and k and Table 1). No significant
change was observed in the amplitude of action potentials (Figure 6l). Intriguingly, attempts to record from
axotomized RGCs treated with siCtl or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were
unsuccessful. These cells had low resting potentials and did not fulfill a
minimal criteria for consistency in firing rates (>40 experiments). Taken
together, our results indicate that axotomy leads to early RGC
hyperexcitability and that siREDD2-mediated rescue of dendritic arbors
restores the light response properties of these neurons.
Figure 6
siREDD2-mediated mTOR activation restores RGC function.
(a–c) Whole-cell recordings were obtained from
ON-center YFP-positive RGCs visualized with epifluorescence and infrared
differential interference contrast (DIC) optics to position the recording
electrode. (b, d and e) The identity of each recorded
cell was confirmed following injection of Alexa Fluor 594 through the
recording pipette. Analysis of RGC intrinsic properties, including membrane
resting potential (f) and resistance (g), did not reveal
significant differences between intact and axotomized neurons with or
without siREDD2 treatment. (h and i) Light stimulation
demonstrated an increase in the frequency of action potentials elicited by
axotomized RGCs (n=7 cells) compared with non-injured
controls (n=7 cells). (j and k) siREDD2
treatment restored the light-induced firing frequency to levels similar to
those recorded from intact neurons (n=7 cells). (l)
No change in the amplitude of action potentials was observed. Values are
expressed as the mean±S.E.M. (ANOVA,
***P<0.001). Cells were recorded from 5 to 7 mice
per group. Scale bars:
(a–e)=20 μm
mTOR activation extends neuronal survival
RGC apoptosis after axonal injury has been associated with soma and nuclear
shrinkage,[31] and mTOR is
known to regulate soma size in neurons.[32] Therefore, we first examined RGC soma size after
axotomy and whether it was susceptible to REDD2-dependent mTOR activity. Our
data show that there was no significant change in RGC soma size at 3 days
after axotomy in the presence or absence of siREDD2 (Figure 7a and Table 1). To
determine if siREDD2-mediated rescue of dendritic arbors had an effect on
neuronal survival, we examined retinas at 5 and 7 after axotomy.
Flat-mounted retinas from eyes treated with siREDD2 at the time of axotomy
consistently showed higher densities of Brn3a-labeled RGCs than those
treated with siCtl (Figures 7b–e).
Quantitative analysis demonstrated that siREDD2 promoted substantial RGC
survival relative to siCtl-treated eyes at 5 days (siREDD2: 91%
survival, 2700±128 RGCs/mm2; siCtl: 74%,
2207±22 RGCs/mm2) and 7 days (siREDD2: 56%,
1675±108 RGCs/mm2; siCtl: 45%, 1344±27
RGCs/mm2) after optic nerve injury (Figure 7f and Table 1). Taken
together, these data suggest that mTOR-mediated protection of dendritic
arbors attenuates RGC loss after axonal damage.
Figure 7
mTOR activation extends neuronal survival. (a) No significant change
in RGC soma size was found at 3 days after axotomy with or without siREDD2
(Axo alone: n=18 cells; Axo+siREDD2:
n=20 cells; intact: n=17 cells; 3–5
mice per group). (b–e) Flat-mounted retinas from eyes
treated with siREDD2 showed higher densities of Brn3a-labeled RGCs than
those treated with siCtl. (f) Quantitative analysis demonstrated that
siREDD2 promoted substantial RGC survival relative to siCtl-treated eyes at
5 and 7 days after axotomy. Values are expressed as RGC densities
(RGCs/mm2; mean±S.E.M., ANOVA, *<0.05,
n=3–5 mice per group). The density of RGCs in
intact, uninjured retinas is shown as reference (100% survival).
Scale bars: (b–e)=50 μm
Discussion
Abnormalities in dendritic structure are a characteristic feature of many brain
diseases, yet the molecular mechanisms leading to dendritic pathology in injured
neurons are poorly understood. In this regard, the data presented here using the
adult mouse visual system support several novel conclusions. First, we show that
dendritic retraction occurs rapidly in a substantial population of RGCs, before
overt cell death, and as a direct consequence of axonal injury. Second, we
demonstrate that damage to RGC axons induces expression of REDD2 coinciding with
strong inhibition of mTOR activity in these neurons. Third, we show that REDD2
upregulation underlies the aberrant dendritic phenotype because siRNA-mediated
ablation of REDD2 restores mTOR activity and rescues RGC dendritic arbor
structure and complexity. Lastly, REDD2 depletion leading to mTOR activation
re-establishes the light response properties of injured RGCs and extends their
survival. Taken together, these data suggest a novel role for REDD2 in the
regulation of dendritic morphology through modulation of mTOR activity after
axonal damage.Dendrites are extremely dynamic during development, expanding and retracting
rapidly in response to intrinsic and environmental cues,[33,34] but
they become stable by adulthood and display little or no structural changes over
extended time periods.[35] The stability
of dendritic arbors is believed to be compromised following injury or during
neurodegeneration. For example, the selective death of RGCs is a cardinal
feature of glaucoma,[36] and shrinkage
of RGC dendritic arbors has been observed in primate, cat and rodent models of
this disease[37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43] as well as in
humanglaucomatous retinas.[44] The
primary site of damage in glaucoma is believed to be at RGC axons in the optic
nerve head.[45] Consistent with this, we
show that axotomy triggers rapid dendritic retraction, a finding that is in
agreement with early dendritic changes observed after optic nerve
crush.[46,47] In spite of the large morphologic diversity of RGC
dendritic arbors in the mouse retina,[20,21] few molecular
markers for discrete RGC subtypes have been identified and include NF-H,
melanopsin and junctional adhesion molecule B.[21,48,49] Among these, only NF-H labels several structural
classes identified by cluster analysis and encompass a substantial RGC
population.[21,48] It has been proposed that different RGC subtypes
display distinct susceptibilities to injury. In the axotomized feline retina,
α cells, which are endowed with large somata and dendritic
arbors, undergo a significant decrease in dendritic field size, whereas
β cells with medium-sized somata and more compact dendritic
trees are less affected.[50] Our results
show that NF-H-positive RGCs, which comprise cells with medium- to large-sized
dendritic arbors, undergo substantial atrophy after axotomy similar to
α cells. A previous study reported dendritic atrophy in
NF-H-positive RGCs at 2 months after laser-induced ocular hypertension, a time
when there is significant soma and axonal loss, but only in the superior
quadrant of hypertensive eyes.[43] We
observed dendritic arbor shrinkage in all retinal quadrants that was independent
of retinal eccentricity, which may reflect differences between these injury
models and also that our analysis was carried out early after axonal injury at a
time preceding massive neurodegeneration.The identification of pathways that contribute to RGC dendritic arbor maintenance
is essential to understand the molecular basis of pathologic changes and to
identify potential therapeutic targets. Our data suggest that the REDD2-mTORC1
pathway is critical for dendritic stability in adult RGCs. We show that damage
to RGC axons leads to cell-specific increase of REDD2, mTORC1 inhibition and
dendritic retraction. REDD2 is strongly upregulated by hypoxia, via the
hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α),[28] as well as oxidative and osmotic
stress.[15,16,51] Optic nerve damage
increases HIF-1α and reactive oxygen species in
RGCs,[52,53] which may account for the axotomy-induced
upregulation of REDD2 reported here. Given that REDD2 is a strong inhibitor of
mTOR, we asked whether injury-induced REDD2 upregulation led to mTOR inhibition
and dendritic retraction. We show that adult RGCs are endowed with constitutive
mTOR activity that is markedly reduced after axotomy, consistent with a study
showing reduced mTOR in RGCs following optic nerve crush.[54] Our loss of function experiments using
siRNA-mediated REDD2 knockdown demonstrate selective restoration of mTOR
activity in injured RGCs accompanied by rescue of dendritic arbors. Moreover,
rapamycin administration completely obliterated the effect of REDD2 depletion on
dendritic rescue. Our data suggest that REDD2-dependent loss of mTORC1 function
underlies RGC dendritic shrinkage, and that mTORC1 is required for the stability
of adult RGC dendrites.Recent work supports a role for mTOR in RGC axon regeneration.[55,56] For
example, deletion of the phosphatase and tensin homolog or TSC1, both negative
regulators of mTOR, promoted robust RGC axon regeneration along the injured
optic nerve tract.[54,57] More recently, Leibinger et
al.[58] showed that
inflammatory stimulation prevented the axotomy-induced decline of mTOR activity
in RGCs and demonstrated that mTOR signaling is important to sustain RGCs in an
active regenerative state. Further research is required to identify the
mTOR-specific targets that contribute to RGC axon regrowth or dendritic
stability. A central role of mTOR is to regulate protein translation; thus, it
is possible that mTORC1 mediates the translation of structural or signaling
proteins in dendrites, to ensure arbor maintenance, and in axons, to promote
regeneration. Several molecules that contribute to dendritic arbor stability
during development have been identified including the microtubule-associated
proteins 1A and 2, integrin α3β1,
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, nuclear Dbf2-related kinases
and the guanine deaminase cypin.[35] It
would be of future interest to assess whether these molecules are translational
targets of mTOR and if they are dysregulated in the context of injury in the
adult CNS. Alternatively, mTOR may directly regulate protein–protein
interactions required for dendritic maintenance. Indeed, mTOR has been shown to
enhance the interaction between microtubules and actin-binding proteins required
for proper dendritic arbor morphology,[59] suggesting a role beyond that of protein
translation.[60]Our electrophysiologic data demonstrate that, soon after injury, RGCs display
increased firing rates characteristic of hyperexcitable neurons. This finding is
consistent with a recent study showing a significant increase in RGC spontaneous
firing of action potentials in a mouse model of microbead-induced ocular
hypertension.[61] This RGC
hyperactivity contrasts with reduced spontaneous firing recorded using
extracellular multielectrode arrays in a similar glaucoma model in
mice,[42] a discrepancy that may
reflect differences in methodology and cell sampling. Remarkably, siREDD2
treatment restored firing rates to levels similar to those found in intact,
non-injured neurons. Intriguingly, we were not able to obtain whole-cell
recordings from axotomized RGCs treated with siCtl. We cannot conclude that
siCtl is toxic to cells because we were not able to record from PBS-injected
eyes either. Our data rather suggest that the combination of axotomy and
intraocular injection has a detrimental effect on the electrophysiologic
properties of RGCs, a response that is overcome by siREDD2. The loss of
light-triggered responses by RGCs subjected to concomitant axotomy and
intravitreal injection suggests that multiple eye injuries impair RGC function,
an observation that deserves further investigation. The excitability of a neuron
is the result of a balance between several factors including resting potential,
input resistance and soma size. The observed dendritic abnormalities reported
here were not accompanied by detectable changes in any of these parameters;
therefore, it is unlikely that axotomy-induced hyperexcitability and the effect
of siREDD2 are the result of changes in intrinsic membrane properties or soma
size. Our data suggest that functional deficits most likely derive from
injury-induced changes in dendritic integrity and rearrangement of synaptic
inputs, with hyperexcitability resulting from an increase in excitatory
connections or a decrease in inhibitory synapses. Of interest, mTOR has been
previously shown to suppress dendritic translation of the potassium channel
Kv1.1,[62] an effect that could
increase burst firing and network synchronization.[63,64] More recently,
TSC1-mTOR signaling was shown to regulate the balance between excitatory and
inhibitory synaptic transmission, which, when defective, led to hippocampal
network hyperactivity.[65]In conclusion, our data support a model in which axonal injury-induced
upregulation of the stress-responsive REDD2 leads to mTOR inhibition triggering
early dendritic arbor retraction, neuronal dysfunction and subsequent death of
adult retinal neurons. Our findings shed light onto a novel mechanism regulating
dendritic pathology, which may be relevant for neurodegenerative diseases
including glaucoma.
Materials and Methods
Experimental animals
Animal procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the
University of Montreal and the Canadian Council on Animal Care for the use
of experimental animals (http://www.ccac.ca). All surgeries were carried out in adult
B6.Cg.Tg[Thy1-YFPH]2Jrs/J mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar
Harbor, ME, USA) or wild-type litter mate controls maintained in our animal
facility. The number of animals used in each experiment is indicated in
Table 1 and in the figure legends.
Axonal injury
Axonal injury was induced by complete transection (axotomy) of the mouse
optic nerve leading to apoptotic loss of RGCs.[66] The left optic nerve was transected at
0.5–1 mm from the optic nerve head avoiding damage to the
ophthalmic artery. The right eye was never operated on and served as intact
control. Fundus examination was performed after axotomy and before the mice
were killed to verify the integrity of the retinal circulation after
surgery. Animals with compromised blood supply were excluded from the
study.
Immunohistochemistry
Flat-mounted retinas
Mice were perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA),
the eyes were immediately collected and the retinas were carefully
dissected out. Retinas were free floated for 30 min in blocking
solution: 10% normal goat serum (NGS), 2% Triton X-100 and
0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in PBS. Retinas were then
incubated for 72 h at 4 °C in blocking solution
(2% NGS, 2% Triton X-100, 0.5% DMSO) containing
each of the following primary antibodies: SMI-32 (NF-H,
10 μg/ml; Sternberger Monoclonals, Baltimore,
MD, USA), GFP (4 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville,
ON, Canada) or Brn3a (0.3 μg/ml; Santa Cruz
Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Retinas were washed and incubated
with secondary antibodies: anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 594
(2 μg/ml; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA),
anti-rabbitFITC (1 : 1000; Sigma-Aldrich) or anti-goatAlexa Fluor 594 (2 μg/ml; Molecular Probes). The
retinas were washed and flat mounted on glass slides with the RGC layer
side up for visualization using a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss AxioSkop
2 Plus; Carl Zeiss Canada, Kirkland, QC, Canada).
Retinal cross-sections
Animals were perfused transcardially with 4% PFA and retinal
cryosections (16 μm) were prepared as previously
described by us.[67] Some
cryosections were prepared from eyes labeled with the retrograde tracer
FG (Fluorochrome, Englewood, CO, USA), which was applied to the superior
colliculus 1 week before optic nerve axotomy as described by
us.[66] Each of the
following primary antibodies were added to the retinal sections in
blocking solution (3% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton
X-100) and incubated overnight at 4 °C: phospho-S6 (Ser
240/244, 1 : 200; Cell Signaling Technology, Boston,
MA, USA), βIII-tubulin (TUJ1, 1 : 400;
Sigma-Aldrich), calbindin (1 : 200; Swant, Marly,
Switzerland), REDD2 (5 μg/ml; Biorbyt, San
Francisco, CA, USA), REDD1 (1 μg/ml; ProSci Inc.,
Poway, CA, USA) or Brn3a (1 μg/ml; Santa Cruz
Biotechnologies). The secondary antibodies used were as follows:
anti-rabbitCy3 (1.5 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich),
anti-mouseFITC (1 : 1000; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-rabbitAlexa Fluor 594 (2 μg/ml; Molecular Probes) or
anti-goatAlexa Fluor 488 (2 μg/ml; Molecular
Probes). Fluorescent labeling was observed with a Zeiss AxioSkop 2 Plus
(Carl Zeiss Canada).
Neuronal survival
Mice were killed by transcardial perfusion with 4% PFA, the retinas
were removed and flat mounted with vitreal side up on a glass slide for
examination of the GCL. YFP-labeled RGCs were counted within three square
areas at distances of 0.25, 0.625 and 1 mm from the optic disc in
each of the four retinal quadrants for a total of 12 retinal areas. RGC
densities were confirmed using flat-mounted retinas labeled with Brn3a
(Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) as described.[68] Fluorescence was examined with a Zeiss Axioskop
2 Plus microscope (Carl Zeiss Canada), and pictures were captured with a CCD
video camera (Retiga; Qimaging, Burnaby, BC, Canada) and analyzed with
Northern Eclipse software (Empix Imaging, Mississauga, ON, Canada).
Dendritic arbor and soma size analysis
Dendritic arbor reconstruction and measurements were performed blinded to
manipulations. High-resolution images of YFP-labeled RGC dendritic arbors
were acquired using a Leica SP1 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems
Inc., Concord, ON, Canada). Scans were taken at 0.48 to
0.65 μm intervals along the z axis (x and
y=1024 × 1024 pixels with 4 to 6 images averaged at each focal
plane). Reconstruction of the entire RGC dendritic arbor was carried out
using the computer-aided filament tracing function of the 3D image analysis
software Imaris (Bitplane, South Windsor, CT, USA). The following parameters
were measured and analyzed in this study: (i) total dendritic
length: the sum of the lengths of all dendrites per neuron, (ii)
total dendritic field area: the area within the contour of the
arbor created by drawing a line connecting the outermost tips of the
dendrites, (iii) branch order: the number of times a dendrite
branches, starting with order 1, which corresponds to the primary branch
emerging from the soma, (iv) Scholl analysis: the number of
dendrites that cross concentric circles at increasing distances
(10 μm interval) from the soma, and (v) soma
size: the area within the contour drawn around the RGC soma to
outline its shape.
Western blot analysis
Whole fresh retinas were rapidly dissected and homogenized with an electric
pestle (Kontes, Vineland, NJ, USA) in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM
Tris, pH 8.0, 135 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS and
10% glycerol supplemented with protease inhibitors). Protein
homogenates were centrifuged at 10 000 r.p.m. for
50 min, and the supernatants were removed and resedimented to yield
solubilized extracts. Retinal extracts were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide
gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Life Science,
Mississauga, ON, Canada). Blots were incubated overnight at 4 °C
with each of the following primary antibodies against: REDD2
(0.5 μg/ml; Fitzgerald, Acton, MA, USA), REDD1
(4 μg/ml; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA) or
β-actin (0.5 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich).
Membranes were incubated in anti-rabbit or anti-mouse peroxidase-linked
secondary antibodies (0.5 μg/ml; Amersham
Biosciences, Baie d'Urfé, QC, Canada). Blots were developed
with a chemiluminescence reagent (ECL; Amersham Biosciences) and exposed to
X-OMAT imaging film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Densitometric
analysis was performed using Scion Image software (Scion Corporation,
Frederick, MD, USA) on scanned autoradiographic films obtained from a series
of three independent western blots each carried out using retinal samples
from distinct experimental groups.
siRNA and rapamycin delivery
The siRNA molecules against REDD2 and siCtls were designed and provided by
Quark Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Research Division, Ness Ziona, Israel). siRNAs
were stabilized by alternating 2′O-methylation[69] and were synthesized by BioSpring
GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany). The following siRNA sequences for REDD2 were
tested with similar results (sense strands):
5′-ACGTGAACTTGGAAATTGA-3′,
5′-CCCAGAGAATTGCCCAAGA-3′ and
5′-TTGGACAGACAGTTCTCCA-3′. siCtls
included a non-targeting siCtl:
5′-ACTAAATTACGCGCGATGC-3′ (sense strand),
and a siCtl-Cy3: 5′-GUGCCAACCUGAUGCAGCU-3′
(sense strand). Each siRNA (7 μg/μl;
total volume: 2 μl) was injected into the vitreous
chamber of the left eye using a Hamilton syringe fitted with a 32-gauge
glass microneedle. The sclera was exposed and the tip of the needle inserted
into the superior ocular hemisphere at a 45° angle through the sclera
and retina into the vitreous space using a posterior approach. This route of
administration avoids injury to the iris or lens, which can promote RGC
survival.[70,71] After the injection, surgical glue (Indermill;
Tyco Health Care, Mansfield, MA, USA) was immediately used to seal the site
of injection. Rapamycin (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA) diluted in
5% Tween-80 and 5% polyethylene glycol 400 was administered by
intraperitoneal injection (6 mg/kg) at the time of axotomy, and 2
days later, for a total of two treatments. This regimen was selected based
on the observation that a single dose of rapamycin (6 mg/kg)
fully inhibits mTOR activity for 60 h in vivo.[72]
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell recordings were performed on isolated flat-mounted retinas of
Thy1-YFPH mice as previously described.[73] Briefly, animals were anesthetized using
isoflurane and then killed by decapitation. The killing of the mice and
dissections were performed in ambient light, after which retinas were kept
in the dark. The eyes were dissected and the retinas were rapidly removed
and placed in Ames' solution (Sigma-Aldrich). The vitreous was gently
removed and the retinas treated with a collagenase/hyaluronidase mixture
(240 and 1000 U/ml, respectively; Worthington Biochemical,
Lakewood, NJ, USA) at room temperature for 5–10 min. Retinas
were mounted with the vitreal side up and superfused with Ames'
solution bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2
at room temperature. YFP-positive RGCs were visualized with an
epifluorescent microscope, captured with an infrared-sensitive CCD camera
and displayed on a video monitor. The camera was mounted on an Olympus
FluoView FV 1000 confocal microscope equipped with a × 40
water-immersion objective. Whole-cell recordings were performed using a
computer-controlled Multiclamp 700A amplifier and a Digidata 1322A digitizer
(Axon Instruments, Downingtown, PA, USA). Patch pipettes (resistance
5–7 MΩ) were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries
(1.5 mm OD, 1.12 mm ID; World Precision Instruments, Sarasota,
FL, USA) on a Sutter P-97 puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA).
Intracellular solution contained: 140 mM K-gluconate, 5 mM
NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM EGTA,
Tris 2 mM ATP, Tris 0.4 mM GTP and Alexa Fluor 594
(15–30 μM; Molecular Probes) (pH 7.2–7.3,
280–300 mOsmol/kg). During recordings, injection of step
current from −250 to 350 pA was carried out to characterize the
intrinsic properties of RGCs. An argon laser (488 nm) was used in the
line scan mode to provide a linear stimulus moving at the speed of
4 μs per pixel. Data analyses were carried out
offline using P-clamp 8 or 9 (Axon Instruments).
Statistical analyses
Data analysis and statistics were performed using the GraphPad Instat
software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) by a one-way ANOVA,
followed by the Bonferroni or Dunnett's multiple comparison post
hoc tests, or by a Student's t-test as indicated in
the legends.
Authors: C Galindo-Romero; M Avilés-Trigueros; M Jiménez-López; F J Valiente-Soriano; M Salinas-Navarro; F Nadal-Nicolás; M P Villegas-Pérez; M Vidal-Sanz; M Agudo-Barriuso Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Katherine T Janssen; Caitlin E Mac Nair; Joel A Dietz; Cassandra L Schlamp; Robert W Nickells Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kevin Kyungsuk Park; Kai Liu; Yang Hu; Patrice D Smith; Chen Wang; Bin Cai; Bengang Xu; Lauren Connolly; Ioannis Kramvis; Mustafa Sahin; Zhigang He Journal: Science Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lynsey Meikle; Kristen Pollizzi; Anna Egnor; Ioannis Kramvis; Heidi Lane; Mustafa Sahin; David J Kwiatkowski Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Helen S Bateup; Caroline A Johnson; Cassandra L Denefrio; Jessica L Saulnier; Karl Kornacker; Bernardo L Sabatini Journal: Neuron Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Achim H Bell; Franco DeMonte; Shaan M Raza; Laurence D Rhines; Claudio E Tatsui; Victor G Prieto; Gregory N Fuller; Diana Bell Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2017-08-27 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Allysa Warling; Riri Uchida; Hyunsoo Shin; Coby Dodelson; Madeleine E Garcia; N Beckett Shea-Shumsky; Sarah Svirsky; Morgan Pothast; Hunter Kelley; Cynthia M Schumann; Christine Brzezinski; Melissa D Bauman; Allyson Alexander; Ann C McKee; Thor D Stein; Matthew Schall; Bob Jacobs Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Marie Claes; Joana R F Santos; Luca Masin; Lien Cools; Benjamin M Davis; Lutgarde Arckens; Karl Farrow; Lies De Groef; Lieve Moons Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.923