Literature DB >> 8028328

Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly.

L E Humes1, B U Watson, L A Christensen, C G Cokely, D C Halling, L Lee.   

Abstract

In the present study, the speech-recognition performance of 50 subjects aged 63 to 83 years was measured for a wide range of materials (nonsense syllables, monosyllabic words, sentences) and listening conditions (presentation levels of 70 and 90 dB SPL, both in quiet and in a noise background). In addition to complete audiologic evaluations, measures of auditory processing (the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities [TBAC], Watson, 1987) and cognitive function (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised [WAIS-R], and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised [WMS-R], Wechsler, 1981, 1987) were obtained from all subjects. Principal component analyses were applied to each of the three sets of measures (speech-recognition, auditory, and cognitive) prior to examining associations among the sets using canonical analyses. Two principal components captured most of the systematic variation in performance sampled by the set of 20 speech-recognition measures. Hearing loss emerged as the single largest factor associated with individual differences in speech-recognition performance among the elderly, accounting for 70-75% of the total variance in speech-recognition performance, with the measures of auditory processing and cognitive function accounting for little or no additional variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8028328     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3702.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  44 in total

1.  Frequent false hearing by older adults: the role of age differences in metacognition.

Authors:  Chad S Rogers; Larry L Jacoby; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-12-12

Review 2.  Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder.

Authors:  Helen Glyde; Louise Hickson; Sharon Cameron; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-08

3.  Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

4.  Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.

Authors:  Pierre L Divenyi; Philip B Stark; Kara M Haupt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  How we do it: employment of listening-development criteria during assessment of infants who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Brittan A Barker; Maura H Kenworthy; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-02

6.  Intra- versus intermodal integration in young and older adults.

Authors:  Brent P Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Ning-Ji He; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Estimates of decision weights and internal noise in the masked discrimination of vowels by young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Lynn Gilbertson; Robert A Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Vijay Parsa; Andrew Johnson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.