| Literature DB >> 25255761 |
Maria Apotrosoaei1, Ioana Mirela Vasincu2, Maria Dragan3, Frédéric Buron4, Sylvain Routier5, Lenuta Profire6.
Abstract
New thiazolidine-4-one derivatives based on the 4-aminophenazone (4-amino-2,3-dimethyl-1-phenyl-3-pyrazolin-5-one) scaffold have been synthesized as potential anti-inflammatory drugs. The pyrazoline derivatives are known especially for their antipyretic, analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, but recently there were synthesized new compounds with important antioxidant, antiproliferative, anticancer and antidiabetic activities. The beneficial effects of these compounds are explained by nonselective inhibition of cyclooxygenase izoenzymes, but also by their potential scavenging ability for reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. The structure of the new compounds was proved using spectroscopic methods (FR-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, MS). The in vitro antioxidant potential of the synthesized compounds was evaluated according to the ferric reducing antioxidant power, phosphomolydenum reducing antioxidant power, DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays. The chemical modulation of 4-aminophenazone (6) through linkage to thiazolidine-propanoic acid derivatives 5a-l led to improved antioxidant potential, all derivatives 7a-l being more active than phenazone. The most active compounds are the derivatives 7e, and 7k, which showed the higher antioxidant effect depending on the antioxidant assay considered.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25255761 PMCID: PMC6270961 DOI: 10.3390/molecules190913824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds 7.
Synthesis of derivatives 4, 5 and 7.
| Entry | Product 4 | No., Yield | Product 5 | No., Yield | Product 7 | No., Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | ||||||
| 3 | ||||||
| 4 | ||||||
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | ||||||
| 7 | ||||||
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 |
Figure 1The absorbance of the derivatives 7a–l in reference to phenazone.
The ferric reducing antioxidant power (EC50, mg/mL) of the derivatives 7a–l.
| Sample | EC50, mg/mL | Sample | EC50, mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9647 ± 0.0108 | 1.1080 ± 0.0256 | ||
| 1.0817 ± 0.0413 | 0.6895 ± 0.0132 | ||
| 0.9073 ± 0.0021 | 0.8648 ± 0.0322 | ||
| 0.4653 ± 0.0334 | 1.0634 ± 0.0441 | ||
| 0.1221 ± 0.0025 | 0.8042 ± 0.0130 | ||
| 0.5316 ± 0.0063 | 0.5455 ± 0.0177 | ||
| nd | 0.0143 ± 0.0027 |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 2The absorbance of the derivatives 7a–l in reference with phenazone.
The phosphomolydenum reducing antioxidant power (EC50 mg/mL) of 7a–l.
| Sample | EC50 mg/mL | Sample | EC50 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0153 ± 0.0010 | 0.0222 ± 0.0043 | ||
| 0.0223 ± 0.0019 | 0.0146 ± 0.0016 | ||
| 0.0209 ± 0.0020 | 0.0220 ± 0.0016 | ||
| 0.0248 ± 0.0020 | 0.0182 ± 0.0080 | ||
| 0.0138 ± 0.0029 | 0.0163 ± 0.0025 | ||
| 0.0166 ± 0.0017 | 0.0143 ± 0.0038 | ||
| nd | 0.0304 ± 0.0024 |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 3The DPPH radical scavenging ability (%) of the derivatives 7a–l.
The DPPH scavenging ability (EC50 mg/mL) of the derivatives 7a–l.
| Sample | EC50 mg/mL | Sample | EC50 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3050 ± 0.0026 | 0.3542 ± 0.0049 | ||
| 0.6161 ± 0.0069 | 0.1858 ± 0.0031 | ||
| 0.5892 ± 0.0099 | 0.0943 ± 0.0016 | ||
| 0.2056 ± 0.0029 | 0.0849 ± 0.0043 | ||
| 0.1685 ± 0.0005 | 0.0390 ± 0.0006 | ||
| 0.1513 ± 0.0020 | 0.2017 ± 0.0025 | ||
| nd | 0.0011 ± 0.0002 |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3, p < 0.05).
Figure 4The ABTS radical scavenging ability (%) of the derivatives 7a–l.
The ABTS scavenging ability (EC50 mg/mL) of the derivatives 7a–l.
| Sample | EC50 mg/mL | Sample | EC50 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9340 ± 0.0251 | 0.6677 ± 0.0160 | ||
| 0.8874 ± 0.0322 | 0.4074 ± 0.0012 | ||
| 0.7020 ± 0.0372 | 0.1729 ± 0.0020 | ||
| 0.2960 ± 0.0067 | 0.2190 ± 0.0097 | ||
| 0.0671 ± 0.0010 | 0.4570 ± 0.0113 | ||
| 0.6800 ± 0.0191 | 0.4556 ± 0.0050 | ||
| nd | 0.0072 ± 0.0002 |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3, p < 0.05).