| Literature DB >> 25254552 |
Mohar Singh1, Ishwari Singh Bisht1, Sandeep Kumar1, Manoranjan Dutta1, Kailash Chander Bansal1, Moreshwar Karale1, Ashutosh Sarker2, Ahmad Amri3, Shiv Kumar4, Swapan Kumar Datta5.
Abstract
Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are invaluable gene sources for various traits of interest, yet these potential resources are themselves increasingly threatened by the impact of climate change as well as other anthropogenic and socio-economic factors. The prime goal of our research was to cover all aspects of wild Lens genetic resource management like species characterization, agro-morphological evaluation, diversity assessment, and development of representative sets for its enhanced utilization in lentil base broadening and yield improvement initiatives. We characterized and evaluated extensively, the global wild annual Lens taxa, originating from twenty seven counties under two agro-climatic conditions of India consecutively for three cropping seasons. Results on various qualitative and quantitative characters including two foliar diseases showed wide variations for almost all yield attributing traits including multiple disease resistance in the wild species, L. nigricans and L. ervoides accessions. The core set developed from the entire Lens taxa had maximum representation from Turkey and Syria, indicating rich diversity in accessions originating from these regions. Diversity analysis also indicated wide geographical variations across genepool as was reflected in the core set. Potential use of core set, as an initial starting material, for genetic base broadening of cultivated lentil was also suggested.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25254552 PMCID: PMC4177869 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of wild annual Lens accessions introduced from ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
| S. No. | Species | Accessions | Origin |
| 1 |
| 04 | India, Israel |
| 2 |
| 171 | Turkey, Iran, Cyprus, Israel, Syria, Jordan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Lebanon, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Czech Republic |
| 3 |
| 42 | Syria, Palestine, Turkey, Israel |
| 4 |
| 20 | Turkey, Syria |
| 5 |
| 35 | Syria, Italy, France, Spain, Croatia, Bahrain, Turkey, Ukraine, Montenegro, Croatia |
| 6 |
| 124 | Ukraine, Turkey, Croatia, Italy, Former Soviet Union, Bahrain, Israel, Palestinian Territories, Syrian, Jordan, Tajikistan, Lebanon, Former Yugoslavia, Montenegro, Armenia, Azerbaijan |
| 7 |
| 09 | Spain, Turkey, France |
Frequency distribution of qualitative plant characteristics in different annual Lens species.
| Character | Class (descriptor state) | Frequency | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0: Absent | 1.00 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.15 | 0.43 |
| 1: Present | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.85 | 0.57 | |
|
| 0: Absent | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| 3: Slight | 0.75 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.71 | |
| 7: Dense | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
|
| 3: Small | 0.00 | 0.53 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.82 | 0.37 | 0.29 |
| 5: Medium | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.14 | 0.49 | 0.71 | |
| 7: Large | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.00 | |
|
| 1: Rudimentary | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.71 |
| 2: Prominent | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.29 | |
|
| 0: None | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 3: Low | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.50 | |
| 5: Medium | 0.00 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.26 | 0.33 | |
| 7: High | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.20 | 0.64 | 0.23 | 0.63 | 0.17 | |
|
| 0: None | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 3: Low | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.33 | |
| 5: Medium | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.50 | |
| 7: High | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.17 | |
|
| 1: White | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| 2: Yellow | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 3: Red | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 4: Purple | 0.83 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.71 | |
|
| 1: Green | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2: Grey | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.57 | |
| 3: Brown | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.65 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.43 | |
| 4: Black | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5: Pink | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
|
| 0: Absent | 0.50 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 1: Dotted | 0.50 | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.00 | |
| 2: Spotted | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.14 | |
| 3: Marbled | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.16 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.57 | |
| 4: Complex | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.68 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.29 | |
|
| 1: Yellow | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.71 |
| 2: Orange | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.29 | |
| 3: Olive-green | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
Range of variations for different quantitative agro-morphological traits in annual Lens species.
| Character |
|
|
| ||||||
| Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | |
|
| 34.50–43.00 | 39.75±1.89 | 9.53 | 27.00–135.00 | 93.76±2.35 | 32.81 | 88.00–143.00 | 126.42±1.81 | 9.30 |
|
| 72.00–86.00 | 79.50±2.93 | 7.38 | 76.00–168.00 | 130.15±1.97 | 19.80 | 124.00–174.00 | 155.02±1.50 | 6.29 |
|
| 17.00–24.00 | 20.50±1.55 | 15.12 | 12.33–95.50 | 26.58±0.68 | 33.48 | 20.33–59.94 | 33.38±1.59 | 30.94 |
|
| 6.50–9.50 | 8.12±0.80 | 19.70 | 4.00–35.00 | 13.47±0.68 | 66.07 | 3.50–22.00 | 14.69±0.32 | 29.06 |
|
| 18.50–208.00 | 92.50±44.50 | 96.22 | 3.00–250.00 | 59.58±3.68 | 80.89 | 5.50–185.50 | 74.75±6.95 | 60.29 |
|
| 1.51–1.83 | 1.63±0.07 | 8.58 | 0.74–2.33 | 1.41±0.02 | 23.40 | 1.00–1.96 | 1.78±0.03 | 12.35 |
|
| 28.50–316.50 | 147.37±67.62 | 91.76 | 4.00–409.00 | 82.53±5.1 | 80.84 | 6.00–357.50 | 136.26±13.83 | 65.77 |
|
| 0.75–2.50 | 1.62±0.38 | 47.53 | 0.15–4.00 | 0.91±0.03 | 56.04 | 0.40–1.10 | 0.73±0.02 | 24.65 |
|
| 0.25–4.25 | 1.85±0.89 | 96.75 | 0.01–3.26 | 0.80±0.04 | 80.00 | 0.06–3.30 | 1.05±0.11 | 68.57 |
|
| 6.35–13.90 | 8.92±1.70 | 38.22 | 0.50–18.50 | 3.73±0.15 | 54.95 | 0.25–10.55 | 5.45±0.29 | 35.59 |
Range of variations for different quantitative agro-morphological traits in annual Lens species.
| Character |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | Range | Mean ± SE | CV (%) | |
|
| 120.00–132.00 | 129.65±0.66 | 2.28 | 92.00–139.00 | 123.88±2.60 | 12.40 | 60.00–141.00 | 118.88±1.99 | 18.67 | 92.00–130.00 | 119.88±5.29 | 13.24 |
|
| 20.00–173.00 | 162.75±0.78 | 2.16 | 130.00–176.00 | 160.42±2.41 | 8.90 | 93.00–173.00 | 153.63±1.97 | 14.38 | 130.00–165.00 | 154.11±4.65 | 9.05 |
|
| 20.75–50.00 | 33.27±1.85 | 24.94 | 19.66–67.00 | 40.23±1.95 | 28.66 | 2.00–59.00 | 37.51±0.94 | 28.15 | 27.25–54.00 | 40.90±2.99 | 21.95 |
|
| 10.50–19.50 | 15.26±0.60 | 17.62 | 2.00–22.75 | 13.57±0.85 | 37.14 | 4.25–52.00 | 16.99±1.67 | 109.53 | 6.00–19.80 | 14.20±1.54 | 32.53 |
|
| 4.50–218.00 | 74.05±11.50 | 68.84 | 5.50–153.00 | 58.30±7.58 | 76.92 | 3.00–1002.00 | 111.78±11.74 | 116.94 | 8.00–185.50 | 63.97±18.80 | 88.19 |
|
| 1.00–1.97 | 1.70±0.06 | 17.05 | 1.00–2.00 | 1.64±0.04 | 14.63 | 1.00–2.22 | 1.72±0.02 | 14.53 | 1.68–2.10 | 1.85±0.04 | 7.02 |
|
| 6.00–420.00 | 133.00±22.30 | 74.97 | 7.50–275.00 | 100.45±14.01 | 82.46 | 3.00–1425.00 | 196.31±18.72 | 106.16 | 13.75–364.00 | 121.10±36.89 | 91.38 |
|
| 0.10–1.10 | 0.69±0.06 | 44.92 | 0.25–1.20 | 0.57±0.03 | 38.59 | 0.10–2.00 | 0.49±0.02 | 51.02 | 0.60–1.85 | 0.92±0.15 | 48.91 |
|
| 0.01–3.30 | 1.01±0.17 | 79.20 | 0.02–2.30 | 0.62±0.09 | 93.54 | 0.04–5.70 | 0.97±0.09 | 104.12 | 0.10–2.75 | 0.99±0.29 | 89.89 |
|
| 1.90–10.00 | 5.79±0.40 | 31.43 | 1.70–15.30 | 5.37±0.47 | 52.32 | 1.20–29.50 | 5.87±0.35 | 66.78 | 3.65–9.90 | 5.55±0.71 | 38.55 |
Species-wise representation of entire Lens collection and representation of accessions in core sets derived from different data sets.
|
| Accessions in entire collection | Accessions in core sets | ||
| I | II | III | ||
|
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
|
| 171 | 21 | 19 | 7 |
|
| 42 | 15 | 12 | 4 |
|
| 20 | 12 | 9 | 6 |
|
| 35 | 18 | 17 | 7 |
|
| 124 | 20 | 19 | 5 |
|
| 9 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Total | 405 | 96 (23.7%) | 86 (21%) | 36 (8.9%) |
Core sets based on I = combined data on both quantitative and qualitative variables; II = data only on quantitative variables, and III = data only on qualitative variables, respectively.
Comparison of SDI of entire collection to core sets derived from different data sets.
| S. No. | Traits | Entire collection | Core sets (Using PowerCore)* | Core set derived through PCSS | ||
| I | II | III | ||||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | Days to flowering | 0.733 | 0.819 | 0.843 | 0.750 | 0.691 |
| 2 | Days to maturity | 0.795 | 0.851 | 0.881 | 0.685 | 0.729 |
| 3 | Plant height | 0.964 | 0.777 | 0.725 | 0.874 | 0.664 |
| 4 | No. of branches plant−1 | 0.035 | 0.116 | 0.127 | 0.987 | 0.116 |
| 5 | No. of pods plant−1 | 0.200 | 0.406 | 0.440 | 0.760 | 0.511 |
| 6 | No. of seeds plant−1 | 0.297 | 0.533 | 0.635 | 0.632 | 0.716 |
| 7 | No. of seeds pod−1 | 0.806 | 0.817 | 0.830 | 0.958 | 0.837 |
| 8 | 100-seed weight | 0.725 | 0.883 | 0.914 | 0.766 | 0.710 |
| 9 | Seed yield plant−1 | 0.735 | 0.745 | 0.698 | 0.816 | 0.698 |
| 10 | Biological yield plant−1 | 0.637 | 0.972 | 0.641 | 0.787 | 0.821 |
| 11 | Resistance to rust | 0.942 | 0.979 | 0.973 | 0.849 | 0.908 |
| 12 | Resistance to powdery mildew | 0.886 | 0.953 | 0.948 | 0.880 | 0.843 |
|
| ||||||
| 13 | Seedling stem pigmentation | 0.475 | 0.613 | 0.613 | 0.687 | 0.525 |
| 14 | Leaf pubescence | 0.963 | 0.917 | 0.952 | 0.966 | 0.982 |
| 15 | Leaflet size | 0.871 | 0.926 | 0.858 | 0.935 | 0.890 |
| 16 | Tendril length | 0.614 | 0.584 | 0.581 | 0.654 | 0.562 |
| 17 | Flower colour | 0.235 | 0.391 | 0.359 | 0.572 | 0.311 |
| 18 | Ground colour of testa | 0.543 | 0.679 | 0.629 | 0.787 | 0.562 |
| 19 | Pattern of testa | 0.790 | 0.915 | 0.880 | 0.970 | 0.805 |
| 20 | Cotyledon colour | 0.500 | 0.621 | 0.622 | 0.637 | 0.562 |
| 21 | Pod shedding | 0.956 | 0.833 | 0.819 | 0.921 | 0.809 |
| 22 | Pod dehiscence | 0.837 | 0.835 | 0.833 | 0.870 | 0.970 |
Core sets based on I = combined data on both quantitative and qualitative variables; II = data only on quantitative variables, and III = data only on qualitative variables, respectively.
Figure 1Hierarchical clustering of Lens accessions based on qualitative phenotypic data.
Figure 2Factorial analysis of Lens accessions based on qualitative phenotypic data.
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of Lens accessions based on quantitative phenotypic data.
Figure 4Factorial analysis of Lens accessions based on quantitative phenotypic data.
Figure 5Hierarchical clustering of Lens core set accessions based on qualitative phenotypic data.
Figure 6Factorial analysis of Lens core set accessions based on qualitative phenotypic data.
Figure 7Hierarchical clustering of Lens core set accessions based on quantitative phenotypic data.
Figure 8Factorial analysis of Lens core set accessions based on quantitative phenotypic data.
Identification of promising accessions for few agronomic and major biotic traits for their introgression in lentil enhancement selected from the entire Lens collection.
| S. No. | Accessions | Species | Gene pool | Trait of Interest | Origin |
| 1. | ILWL 247, 255, 476, |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust | Syria, Turkey |
| 2. | ILWL 346, 350, 369, 378, 490 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to powdery mildew | Syria, Armenia |
| 3. | ILWL 372 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Uzbekistan |
| 4. | ILWL 80, 381 |
| Primary | Resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Tajikistan |
| 5. | ILWL 456 |
| Primary | High 100-seed weight and resistant to rust | Turkey |
| 6. | ILWL 39 |
| Primary | Resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 7. | ILWL 165, 203, 237, 238 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust | Syria |
| 8. | ILWL 167 |
| Primary | Resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Syria |
| 9. | ILWL 97 |
| Primary | Resistant to powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 10. | ILWL 121, EC-718446 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1 | Syria |
| 11. | ILWL 23, 24, 25 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | Resistant to rust | Italy, HRV |
| 12. | ILWL 22 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | Resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Italy |
| 13. | ILWL 37, 191 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 14. | ILWL 40, 41, 42, 159, 269, 292,294, 321, 398, 418, EC-718428, 718439 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Ukraine, Turkey, Italy, Syria, |
| 15. | ILWL 50, 54, 56, 58 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust | HRV, Israel, PSE, Turkey |
| 16. | ILWL 91 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | Resistant to powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 17. | ILWL 29, EC-718692 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1 | Spain, France |
Agro-ecological representation of species-wise accessions in entire Lens collection and core sets derived from different data sets.
| S. No. | Origin | Accessions in entire collection | Accessions in core sets | ||
| I | II | III | |||
| 1 | Alpes-Cote d’Azur | 1 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 2 | Armenia | 2 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 3 | Azerbaijan | 1 | – | – | – |
| 4 | Bahrain | 4 | – | 1 | – |
| 6 | Cyprus | 3 | – | – | – |
| 7 | Former Soviet Union | 2 | – | – | – |
| 8 | Former Yugoslavia | 2 | – | – | – |
| 9 | France | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 10 | HRV | 14 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 11 | Iran | 2 | – | – | – |
| 12 | Israel | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 13 | Italy | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 14 | Jordan | 11 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 15 | Lebanon | 9 | 2 | 2 | – |
| 16 | Montenegro | 3 | – | 1 | 1 |
| 17 | Palestine | 1 | 1 | – | 1 |
| 18 | PSE | 3 | – | – | – |
| 19 | Russia | 1 | – | – | – |
| 20 | Spain | 12 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| 21 | Syria | 152 | 20 | 24 | 3 |
| 22 | Tajikistan | 4 | 2 | 1 | – |
| 23 | Turkmenistan | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 24 | Turkey | 113 | 28 | 22 | 14 |
| 25 | UBA | 1 | – | – | – |
| 26 | Ukraine | 3 | 1 | 1 | – |
| 27 | Uzbekistan | 8 | 2 | – | – |
| 28 | Unknown | 30 | 21 | 17 | 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Identification of some promising accessions for few agronomic and major biotic traits for their introgression in lentil enhancement selected from the qualitative core set.
| S. No. | Accessions | Species | Gene pool | Trait of Interest | Origin |
| 1. | ILWL 80 |
| Primary | Resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Tajikistan |
| 2. | ILWL 378 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to powdery mildew | Turkmenistan |
| 3. | ILWL 203 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust | Syria |
| 4. | EC-718446 |
| Primary | High number of pods plant−1 | Syria |
| 5. | ILWL 97 |
| Primary | Resistant to powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 6. | ILWL 37 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 7. | ILWL 191 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 8. | ILWL 91 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | Resistant to powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 9. | ILWL 269 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1, resistant to rust and powdery mildew | Turkey |
| 10. | ILWL 29 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | High number of pods plant−1 | Spain |