Literature DB >> 25253957

Extraesophageal saline enhances endoscopic ultrasonography to differentiate esophagus and adjacent organs.

Jian-Jun Li1, Hong-Bo Shan1, Long-Jun He1, Thomas D Wang1, Huan Xiong1, Li-Ming Chen1, Xiao-Hai Li1, Xin-Xin Huang1, Guang-Yu Luo1, Yin Li1, Guo-Liang Xu1.   

Abstract

AIM: To distinguish between the esophagus and adjacent organs using extraesophageal saline injection (ESI) in a canine model.
METHODS: ESI was performed through the esophagus under the guidance of linear-array endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Approximately 15 mL of methylene blue saline (0.5%) was then injected through each of the extraesophageal puncture points using a 22 G needle. Radial EUS examinations were conducted before and after ESI. EUS images of the trachea, tracheal bifurcation, arcus aortae and thoracic aorta were recorded. Vital signs were monitored during the ESI procedure and EUS examination. The dogs were then sacrificed for exploratory thoracotomy.
RESULTS: No obvious fluctuation in vital signs or serious adverse events occurred during the ESI procedure. On EUS imaging, an apparent hypoechoic area outside the esophagus, which separated the esophagus and adjacent organs, was visualized. The adventitious of the esophagus and adjacent organs were easily distinguished. The findings of subsequent exploratory thoracotomy confirmed the EUS findings: obvious accumulation of a blue liquid in the extraesophageal tissues, as well as in the esophageal-thoracic aorta space, esophageal-arcus aortae space and esophageal-tracheal space.
CONCLUSION: The esophagus and adjacent organs were successfully separated by ESI, and extraesophageal saline acted as an effective ultrasonic contrast agent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Esophageal cancer; Extraesophageal saline injection; Staging; Trachea

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253957      PMCID: PMC4168090          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Lightdale; Ketan G Kulkarni
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  [Collagen diseases (author's transl)].

Authors:  Y Hiraki; M Miyake; H Hayashi; Y Takeda; K Aono
Journal:  Rinsho Hoshasen       Date:  1981

3.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: results from a referral center for early esophageal cancer.

Authors:  O Pech; E Günter; F Dusemund; J Origer; D Lorenz; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Tumour size of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma measured with multidetector computed tomography for predicting regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.

Authors:  Hang Li; Tian-wu Chen; Zhen-lin Li; Xiao-ming Zhang; Xiao-li Chen; Li-ying Wang; Li Zhou; Rui Li; Chun-ping Li; Xiao-hua Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound: accuracy in staging superficial carcinomas of the esophagus.

Authors:  Sabrina Rampado; Paolo Bocus; Giorgio Battaglia; Alberto Ruol; Giuseppe Portale; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A study comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) in staging oesophageal cancer and their role in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Duminda Subasinghe; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-03

8.  18F-FDG PET/CT has a high impact on patient management and provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of esophageal cancer: a prospective study with mature survival data.

Authors:  Thomas W Barber; Cuong P Duong; Trevor Leong; Mathias Bressel; Elizabeth G Drummond; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Guillaume Piessen; Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 10.  Staging esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Eisenbud Quint; Naama R Bogot
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.