| Literature DB >> 25252824 |
Ya-Nan Li, Li Liu, Hong-Mei Qiao, Hang Cheng, Huan-Ji Cheng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, radiological features and outcomes of 42 children with post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans (PIBO).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25252824 PMCID: PMC4181416 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Chest HRCT findings in 42 children
| HRCT findings | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Mosaic pattern | 41 | 97.6 |
| Bronchiectasis | 35 | 83.3 |
| Peribronchial thickening | 28 | 66.7 |
Figure 1HRCT scan shows a mosaic pattern and bronchiectasis in a 2-year-old boy (A) and 3- year-old girl (B) with PIBO, respectively.
Clinical characteristics of 42 cases and the three subgroups: adeno-associated BO group, -associated BO group and other agent BO group
| Total cases, n = 42 | G1, n = 21 | G2, n = 10 | G3, n = 11 |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at injury, years, (mean and ranges) | 1.38 (0.6–3.8) | 1.30 (0.6–3.4) | 1.51 (0.7–3.8) | 1.43 (0.7–3.7) | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
| Gender (%males) | 69.0 | 66.7 | 60.0 | 81.8 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.36 |
| Age (years) at diagnosis (mean and range) | 2.18 (0.8–5.7) | 1.87 (0.8–5.4) | 2.60 (1.0–5.7) | 2.42 (1.1–5.1) | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.12 |
| Hospitalization (days) (mean and range) | 30.3 (14–73) | 35.2 (16–73) | 28.5 (18–64) | 22.4 (14–47) | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.29 |
| LTOT, n (% of cases) | 6(14.3) | 4 (19.0) | 1 (10.0) | 1(9.1) | 1.00 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
| Effective, n (% of cases) | 36(85.7) | 19 (90.5) | 9 (90.0) | 8 (72.7) | 1.00 | 0.31 | 0.58 |
Note: P 1 = comparing G1 with G2; P 2 = comparing G1 with G3; P 3 = comparing G2 with G3. LTOT, long term home oxygen therapy. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare continuous variables, including age at injury, age at diagnosis and hospitalization. Fishers’s exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, including gender, LTOT and effectiveness.
Pulmonary function test results of children with PIBO at the time of diagnosis (mean ± SD)
| Pulmonary function tests | Test index | Estimated value (% Predicted) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases, n = 42 | G1, n = 21 | G2, n = 10 | G3, n = 11 |
|
|
| ||
| Tidal breathing analysis | tPTEF%tE | (23.9 ± 4.6)% | (22.9 ± 4.8)% | (25.4 ± 6.2)% | (24.6 ± 6.5)% | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.78 |
| VPEF%VE | (20.5 ± 3.9)% | (19.4 ± 4.1)% | (20.8 ± 4.7)% | (22.4 ± 5.1)% | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.47 | |
| Impulse oscillometry | Total cases, n = 42 | G1, n = 8 | G2, n = 4 | G3, n = 4 |
|
|
| |
| Z5 | (147.5 ± 39.3)% | (153.2 ± 44.2)% | (134.9 ± 51.7)% | (148.7 ± 36.0)% | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.68 | |
| R5 | (140.4 ± 32.9)% | (137.2 ± 40.1)% | (129.5 ± 43.4)% | (157.7 ± 32.9)% | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.34 | |
| X5 | (226.5 ± 63.6)% | (189.2 ± 40.4)% | (247.7 ± 59.3)% | (279.9 ± 63.6)% | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.49 | |
Note: tPTEF%tE: ratio of time to reach peak tidal expiratory flow to total expiratory time; VPEF%VE: ratio of volume to reach peak expiratory flow to total expiratory volume; Z5: magnitude of respiratory impedance; R5: total respiratory resistance; X5: distal capacitive reactance; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; PEF: peak expiratory flow. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare continuous variables, including tPTEF%tE, VPEF%VE, Z5, R5 and X5.
P 1 = comparing G1 with G2; P 2 = comparing G1 with G3; P 3 = comparing G2 with G3.
Figure 2Pre-treatment (A) and post-treatment (B) HRCT scans of the lung in a 5-year-old boy. There was no significant improvement following treatment.