Literature DB >> 25250975

Use of an electronic medical record to create the marshfield clinic twin/multiple birth cohort.

John Mayer1, Terrie Kitchner, Zhan Ye, Zhiyi Zhou, Min He, Steven J Schrodi, Scott J Hebbring.   

Abstract

Population-based genetic analyses, such as the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), have proven powerful for describing the genetic complexities of common disease in epidemiologic research. However, the significant challenges faced by population-based study designs have resulted in revitalization of family-based approaches, including twin studies. Twin studies are unique in their ability to ascertain both heritable and environmental contributions to human disease. Several regional and national twin registries have been constructed using a variety of methods to identify potential twins. A significant challenge in constructing these large twin registries includes the substantial resources required to recruit participants, collect phenotypic data, and update the registries as time progresses. Here we describe the use of the Marshfield Clinic electronic medical record (EMR) to identify a cohort of 19,226 patients enriched for twins or multiples. This cohort defines the Marshfield Clinic Twin/Multiple Birth Cohort (MCTC). An EMR system provides both a mechanism to identify potential twins and a source of detailed phenotypic data in near real time without the need for patient contact outside standard medical care. To demonstrate that the MCTC can be used for genetic-based epidemiologic research, concordance rates for muscular dystrophy (MD) and fragile-X syndrome-two highly heritable diseases-were assessed. Observations indicate that both MD and fragile-X syndrome are highly correlated among affected twins in the MCTC (P ≅ 3.7 × 10(-6) and 1.1 × 10(-4) , respectively). These findings suggest that EMR systems may not only be an effective resource for predicting families of twins, but can also be rapidly applied to epidemiologic research.
© 2014 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fragile-X syndrome; heritability; muscular dystrophy; twins

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250975      PMCID: PMC4384889          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  31 in total

1.  Update on the NAS-NRC Twin Registry.

Authors:  William F Page
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  The Michigan State University Twin Registry (MSUTR): genetic, environmental and neurobiological influences on behavior across development.

Authors:  Kelly L Klump; S Alexandra Burt
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  The Swedish Twin Registry: establishment of a biobank and other recent developments.

Authors:  Patrik K E Magnusson; Catarina Almqvist; Iffat Rahman; Andrea Ganna; Alexander Viktorin; Hasse Walum; Linda Halldner; Sebastian Lundström; Fredrik Ullén; Niklas Långström; Henrik Larsson; Anastasia Nyman; Clara Hellner Gumpert; Maria Råstam; Henrik Anckarsäter; Sven Cnattingius; Magnus Johannesson; Erik Ingelsson; Lars Klareskog; Ulf de Faire; Nancy L Pedersen; Paul Lichtenstein
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 4.  The continuing value of twin studies in the omics era.

Authors:  Jenny van Dongen; P Eline Slagboom; Harmen H M Draisma; Nicholas G Martin; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  The Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry: method of construction.

Authors:  S Eisen; W True; J Goldberg; W Henderson; C D Robinette
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1987

6.  Australian NHMRC twin registry.

Authors:  N G Martin; J B Gibson; J D Mathews
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-11-14       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry, revisited.

Authors:  Emily C H Lilley; Judy L Silberg
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.587

8.  A PheWAS approach in studying HLA-DRB1*1501.

Authors:  S J Hebbring; S J Schrodi; Z Ye; Z Zhou; D Page; M H Brilliant
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.676

9.  The genetic and environmental bases of complex human-disease: extending the utility of twin-studies.

Authors:  Douglas S Goodin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The challenges, advantages and future of phenome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Scott J Hebbring
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.397

View more
  3 in total

1.  Applying family analyses to electronic health records to facilitate genetic research.

Authors:  Xiayuan Huang; Robert C Elston; Guilherme J Rosa; John Mayer; Zhan Ye; Terrie Kitchner; Murray H Brilliant; David Page; Scott J Hebbring
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Phenome-wide association study maps new diseases to the human major histocompatibility complex region.

Authors:  Jixia Liu; Zhan Ye; John G Mayer; Brian A Hoch; Clayton Green; Loren Rolak; Christopher Cold; Seik-Soon Khor; Xiuwen Zheng; Taku Miyagawa; Katsushi Tokunaga; Murray H Brilliant; Scott J Hebbring
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Cardiac Anomalies in Liveborn and Stillborn Monochorionic Twins.

Authors:  Elizabeth McPherson; Colin Korlesky; Scott Hebbring
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2020-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.