| Literature DB >> 25249823 |
Min Zhao1, Fengjiao Shang2, Jianguo Lv3, Ying Song2, Feng Wang2, Zhitao Zhou2, Gang He4, Miao Zhang4, Xueping Song4, Zhaoqi Sun4, Yiyong Wei2, Xiaoshuang Chen5.
Abstract
ZnO thin films have been synthesized by means of a simple hydrothermal method with different solvents. The effect of deionized water content in the mixed solvents on the surface morphology, crystal structure, and optical property has been investigated by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and UV-Vis spectrophotometer. A large number of compact and well-aligned hexagonal ZnO nanorods and the maximal texture coefficient have been observed in the thin film, which is grown in the mixed solvent with x = 40%. A lot of sparse, diagonal, and pointed nanorods can be seen in the ZnO thin film, which is grown in the 40-mL DI water solution. The optical band gap decreases firstly and then increases with the increase of x. Reversible wettability of ZnO thin films were studied by home-made water contact angle apparatus. Reversible transition between hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity may be attributed to the change of surface chemical composition, surface roughness and the proportion of nonpolar planes on the surface of ZnO thin films. Photocurrent response of ZnO thin films grown at different solvents were measured in air. The response duration of the thin film, which is grown in the solvent with x = 40%, exhibits a fast growth in the beginning but cannot approach the saturate current value within 100 s. The theoretical mechanism for the slower growth or decay duration of the photocurrent has been discussed in detail.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical synthesis; Electrical conductivity; Electron microscopy; Thin films
Year: 2014 PMID: 25249823 PMCID: PMC4171712 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Figure 1Typical SEM images of ZnO thin films (a) = 0%, (b) = 40%, (c) = 80%, (d) = 100%.
Figure 2XRD patterns of ZnO thin films.
Figure 3Texture coefficient of ZnO thin films versus water content.
Figure 4Absorption spectra of ZnO thin films with different DI water content.
Figure 5Plots of ( ) versus of ZnO thin films.
Optical band gap and contact angle reduction rate of ZnO thin films
| 0 | 3.18 | 0.847 |
| 40 | 3.17 | 0.789 |
| 80 | 3.21 | 0.891 |
| 100 | 3.26 | 0.922 |
Figure 6Images of water droplet shape on the ZnO thin films before (a) and after (b) UV irradiation for 120 min. The corresponding WCA was plotted in (c).
Figure 7Photocurrent growth and decay under the periodic (100 s) illumination of UV light at 5-V bias voltages.