Literature DB >> 25249244

Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.

John A Scolaro1, Jason E Hsu2, David J Svach3, Samir Mehta4.   

Abstract

Operative fixation of extra-articular distal humerus using a single posterolateral column plate has been described but the biomechanical properties or limits of this technique is undefined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of distal humerus fracture fixation using three standard fixation constructs. Two equal groups were created from forty sawbones humeri. Osteotomies were created at 80mm or 50mm from the tip of the trochlea. In the proximal osteotomy group, sawbones were fixed with an 8-hole 3.5mm LCP or with a 6-hole posterolateral plate. In the distal group, sawbones were fixed with 9-hole medial and lateral 3.5mm distal humerus plates and ten sawbones were fixed with a 6-hole posterolateral plate. Biomechanical testing was performed using a servohydraulic testing machine. Testing in extension as well as internal and external rotation was performed. Destructive testing was also performed with failure being defined as hardware pullout, sawbone failure or cortical contact at the osteotomy. In the proximal osteotomy group, the average bending stiffness and torsional stiffness was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate than with the 3.5mm LCP. In the distal osteotomy group, the average bending stiffness and torsional stiffness was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate than the 3.5mm LCP. In extension testing, the yield strength was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate in the proximal osteotomy specimens, and the dual plating construct in the distal osteotomy specimens. The yield strength of specimens in axial torsion was significantly greater with the posterolateral plate in the proximal osteotomy specimens, and the dual plating construct in the distal osteotomy specimens. Limited biomechanical data to support the use of a pre-contoured posterolateral distal humerus LCP for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus exists. We have found that this implant provided significantly greater bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and yield strength than a single 3.5mm LCP plate for osteotomies created 80mm from the trochlea. At the more distal osteotomy, dual plating was biomechanically superior. Our results suggest that single posterolateral column fixation of extra-articular humerus fractures is appropriate for more proximal fractures but that dual plate fixation is superior for more distal fractures.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical; Distal humerus; Extra-articular; Posterolateral plate

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25249244     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  13 in total

1.  Parallel versus orthogonal plate osteosynthesis of adult distal humerus fractures: a meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Wei-Ren Su; Wei-Chin Lin; Tai-Wei Tai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long dorsal "Y-shaped" plate for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures.

Authors:  T Druel; M Burnier; Guillaume Herzberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Risk factors for hardware-related complications after extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate.

Authors:  Hyoung-Seok Jung; Yoo-Sun Won; Yang-Seon Choi; Jae-Sung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts.

Authors:  Steinitz Amir; Sailer Jannis; Rikli Daniel
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

5.  Does posterior configuration have similar strength as parallel configuration for treating comminuted distal humerus fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Kai-Lan Hsu; Chih-Kai Hong; Cheng-Li Lin; Ming-Long Yeh; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Outcome of anatomic locking plate in extraarticular distal humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Deepak Jain; Gurpreet S Goyal; Rajnish Garg; Pankaj Mahindra; Mohammad Yamin; Harpal S Selhi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Outcome of Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Fractures Fixed by Single Column Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Locking Compression Plate Using Triceps Sparing Postero-Lateral Approach.

Authors:  Nadeem Ali; Naseer Ahmad Mir; Tahir Ahmad Dar; Mohmad Nawaz Rather; Wajahat Ahmad Mir; Senin S; Saheel Maajid
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-10

8.  Biomechanical Comparison of Fixed- versus Variable-Angle Locking Screws for Distal Humerus Comminuted Fractures.

Authors:  Ali Nourbakhsh; Adam G Hirschfeld; Sravan Dhulipala; William Hutton; Timothy Ganey; Luis Lozada; Daniel Schlatterer; Gary Mark Lourie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-08-12

9.  Biomechanical Study of the Fixation Strength of Anteromedial Plating for Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Yin-Feng Zheng; Jun-Lin Zhou; Xiao-Hong Wang; Lei Shan; Yang Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ali Al-Hamdani; Jeppe V Rasmussen; Kenneth Holtz; Bo S Olsen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.