Literature DB >> 25248308

Arthroscopic image distortion-part II: the effect of lens angle and portal location in a 3D knee model.

Yuichi Hoshino1,2, Benjamin B Rothrauff3, Daniel Hensler3,4, Freddie H Fu3, Volker Musahl3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Distortion in arthroscopic views can interfere with accurate graft placement in ACL reconstruction, yet the effect of arthroscopic lens angle and portal location on image distortion is unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantify the image distortion resulting from the use of angulated arthroscope lenses through multiple portals, thereby identifying the optimal parameters to minimize distortion.
METHODS: A uniform grid of dots was attached to the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch of a Sawbones(®) knee model. The inferior half of the lateral wall was divided equally along the distoproximal axis into three regions-shallow, central, and deep. Each region was imaged using five different arthroscopic configurations [0° arthroscope through anteromedial (AM) portal, 30° arthroscope through AM and anterolateral (AL) portals, 70° arthroscope through AM and AL portals]. For each configuration, the differences in magnification and deformity ratios between the three regions were calculated.
RESULTS: Less than 100 % of central region magnification was observed in the deep region, while more than 100 % was found in the shallow region. The AL approach produced larger magnification errors in the shallow region, as compared to the AM approach. Deformity ratios less than 100 % were found with both 0° and 30° arthroscopes, whereas deformity ratios exceeding 100 % were found with 70° arthroscopes.
CONCLUSIONS: The least distorted and the most consistent image of the femoral ACL insertion is provided through the AM portal using either a 30° or 70° arthroscope lens. Surgeons should carefully select the arthroscope and portal to minimize image distortion and ensure accurate surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anteromedial portal; Image distortion; Knee arthroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25248308     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3268-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Nobuto Kitamura; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama; Akio Minami
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Morphology of anterior cruciate ligament attachments for anatomic reconstruction: a cadaveric dissection and radiographic study.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; James Robinson; Pascal Christel; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Patrick Djian; Guy Bellier; Abdou Sbihi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Potential risk of cartilage damage in double bundle ACL reconstruction: impact of knee flexion angle and portal location on the femoral PL bundle tunnel.

Authors:  Thore Zantop; Ann-Kristin Haase; Freddie H Fu; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel.

Authors:  Christopher D Harner; Nicholas J Honkamp; Anil S Ranawat
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Daisuke Araki; Koji Nishimoto; Seiji Kubo; Doita Minoru; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5-8-year follow-up.

Authors:  P Aglietti; R Buzzi; F Giron; A J Simeone; G Zaccherotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Arthroscopic image distortion-part I: the effect of lens and viewing angles in a 2-dimensional in vitro model.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Daniel Hensler; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Max Ekdahl; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement--a cadaver study.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Jürgen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Paulo H Araujo; Carola F van Eck; Jeffrey A Macalena; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  2 in total

1.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Arthroscopic Viewing Position Affects Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Tunnel Length Measurements.

Authors:  Sheeba M Joseph; Michael R Karns; Derrick M Knapik; James E Voos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.