Literature DB >> 18442692

Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement--a cadaver study.

Rainer Siebold1, Thomas Ellert, Stefan Metz, Jürgen Metz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the femoral insertions of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to develop arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle (DB) bone tunnel placement.
METHODS: The femoral insertions of the AM and PL bundles were dissected in 50 human cadaveric knees, documented on digital photographs, and quantified with a digital image analysis system.
RESULTS: The insertion areas of both bundles were significantly larger in men (53 mm(2) for AM and 45 mm(2) for PL) than in women (39 mm(2) for AM and 39 mm(2) for PL), and the average ACL insertion area was significantly larger in left knees than in right knees. According to the "femoral center angle model," the centers of the AM and PL bundles were horizontally aligned when the femoral shaft axis was lifted 12 degrees from the horizontal plane or when the knee was flexed to 102 degrees . In this position the center of the AM bundle was 3 to 4 mm "lower" (arthroscopic terminology) to the over-the-top position, and the distance of the PL bundle to the "shallow" articular cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle was 6 mm. According to the "modified femoral clock wall model," the average centers of the AM and PL bundles were both aligned at 1 o'clock for a left knee and at 11 o'clock for a right knee in 102 degrees of knee flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: The average femoral insertion areas of the ACL and the AM and PL bundles were significantly larger in men compared with women and in left knees compared with right knees. According to the femoral center angle model, the AM and PL insertions are aligned horizontally in an average of 102 degrees of knee flexion, resulting in one commuted time for the AM and PL bundles in the modified femoral clock wall model. Both models support reproducible and reliable arthroscopic AM and PL bone tunnel placement. With regard to a mean anatomic anteroposterior length of the femoral ACL insertion of 14 to 15 mm, adequate DB bone tunnel placement should be possible in most cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides an anatomic description of the femoral AM and PL insertions including gender differences, landmarks, and arthroscopic orientation models for DB bone tunnel placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442692     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  68 in total

1.  A CT-based classification of prior ACL femoral tunnel location for planning revision ACL surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Pedro Debieux; Biju Benjamin; Sébastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of tunnel placements and clinical results of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction before and after starting the use of double-bundle technique.

Authors:  Piia Suomalainen; Anna-Stina Moisala; Antti Paakkala; Pekka Kannus; Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Size comparison of ACL footprint and reconstructed auto graft.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Kenji Shirakura; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first?

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Takumi Nakagawa; Hideki Takeda; Kohei Nakajima; Shuichi Nakayama; Atsushi Fukai; Jinso Hirota; Yoshinori Kachi; Hirotaka Kawano; Toshiki Miura; Naoshi Fukui; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Implant-free replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with the double bundle technique: a modification of Pässler's operation technique].

Authors:  H Boszotta
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  The correlation of femoral tunnel length with the height and area of the lateral wall of the femoral intercondylar notch in anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Keinosuke Ryu; Makoto Suruga; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study in rabbits.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Nicolas Efstathopoulos; Ioannis Sourlas; Anastasia Pilichou; Georgios Papachristou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Daisuke Araki; Koji Nishimoto; Seiji Kubo; Doita Minoru; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The anterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology.

Authors:  Thomas Tampere; Tom Van Hoof; Michiel Cromheecke; Hans Van der Bracht; Jorge Chahla; Peter Verdonk; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.