| Literature DB >> 25247190 |
Kuniaki Tanahashi1, Atsushi Natsume1, Fumiharu Ohka2, Hiroyuki Momota1, Akira Kato1, Kazuya Motomura1, Naoki Watabe3, Shuichi Muraishi3, Hitoshi Nakahara4, Yahachi Saito4, Ichiro Takeuchi5, Toshihiko Wakabayashi1.
Abstract
Glioma of infiltrative nature is challenging for surgeons to achieve tumor-specific and maximal resection. Raman spectroscopy provides structural information on the targeted materials as vibrational shifts. We utilized Raman spectroscopy to distinguish invasive tumors from normal tissues. Spectra obtained from replication-competent avian sarcoma-(RCAS-) based infiltrative glioma cells and glioma tissues (resembling low-grade human glioma) were compared with those obtained from normal mouse astrocytes and normal tissues. In cell analysis, the spectra at 950-1000, 1030, 1050-1100, 1120-1130, 1120-1200, 1200-1300, 1300-1350, and 1450 cm(-1) were significantly higher in infiltrative glioma cells than in normal astrocytes. In brain tissue analysis, the spectra at 1030, 1050-1100, and 1200-1300 cm(-1) were significantly higher in infiltrative glioma tissues than in normal brain tissues. These spectra reflect the structures of proteins, lipids, and DNA content. The sensitivity and specificity to predict glioma cells by distinguishing normal cells were 98.3% and 75.0%, respectively. Principal component analysis elucidated the significance of spectral difference between tumor tissues and normal tissues. It is possible to distinguish invasive tumors from normal tissues by using Raman spectroscopy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25247190 PMCID: PMC4163456 DOI: 10.1155/2014/860241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Raman spectrum of glioma cells and normal astrocytes. (a) Measurement of Raman scattering spectra in glioma cells and normal astrocytes. (b) The difference in Raman scattering spectra between glioma cells (red) and normal astrocytes (blue). (c) Statistical analysis. Statistical significance of the difference between tumor and normal samples was measured for each spectrum using the P value (red) and false discovery rate (FDR; blue) based on t-statistics (FDR was computed by permutation label permutation).
Raman shift corresponding to chemical structure.
| Shift (cm−1) | Chemical structure |
|---|---|
| 950–1000 | C–C (protein, collagen) |
| 1004 | phenylalanine |
| 1030 | C–H (phenylalanine) |
| 1050–1100 | C–C (lipid) |
| 1100 | O–P–O (phosphate backbone) |
| 1120–1130 | C–C (lipid) |
| 1120–1200 | C–C/C–N (protein) |
| 1200–1300 | amide III, a-helix, b-sheet |
| 1300–1350 | C–H2 (lipid), protein, nucleic acid |
| 1450 | C–H2 (lipid) |
Figure 2Raman spectrum of infiltrative glioma in the mouse brains. (a) The average spectra in the six brains at 1030 (C–H; phenylalanine), 1050–1100 (C–C; lipid), 1100 (O–P–O; DNA), and 1200–1300 cm−1 (amide III) were significantly higher in glioma tissues (red) than in the normal brains (blue). (b) Statistical analysis. Statistical significance of the difference between tumor and normal samples was measured for each spectrum using the P value (red) and false discovery rate (FDR; blue) based on t-statistics (FDR was computed by permutation label permutation). (c) Representative images of H&E staining and 3D plots of principal component analysis. The clusters of tumor (red ellipsoids) were separated from those of normal (blue ellipsoids), which supported the significance of spectral difference between tumor tissues and normal tissues.
Figure 3Tumor prediction. The outputs from the model were described as blue dots within the range between 0 and 1, and values greater than 0.5 were considered as tumor (positive; green dots on the position of 1), whereas those lower were regarded as normal (negative; green dots on the position of 0). (a) True tumors and normals were described as red dots on the positions of 1 and 0, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 98.3% and 75.0%, respectively. (b) While the accuracy of tumor prediction probability in brain tumor tissues was not as robust as it was in cells, the specificity was still high (76.4%).
Figure 4Raman chemical imaging in tissues. (a) A representative map image based on lipid contents. The white arrow indicates high signal of lipids. (b) The adjacent H&E section. The large inset corresponds to the mapping area of (a). (c) The high magnification of the small inset in (b). A high signal (red) in (a) is evident in the region containing the tumor. The border is represented as green area.