Literature DB >> 25246730

Thiolene and SIFEL-based Microfluidic Platforms for Liquid-Liquid Extraction.

Sachit Goyal1, Amit V Desai1, Robert W Lewis2, David R Ranganathan3, Hairong Li3, Dexing Zeng3, David E Reichert3, Paul J A Kenis1.   

Abstract

Microfluidic platforms provide several advantages for liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) processes over conventional methods, for example with respect to lower consumption of solvents and enhanced extraction efficiencies due to the inherent shorter diffusional distances. Here, we report the development of polymer-based parallel-flow microfluidic platforms for LLE. To date, parallel-flow microfluidic platforms have predominantly been made out of silicon or glass due to their compatibility with most organic solvents used for LLE. Fabrication of silicon and glass-based LLE platforms typically requires extensive use of photolithography, plasma or laser-based etching, high temperature (anodic) bonding, and/or wet etching with KOH or HF solutions. In contrast, polymeric microfluidic platforms can be fabricated using less involved processes, typically photolithography in combination with replica molding, hot embossing, and/or bonding at much lower temperatures. Here we report the fabrication and testing of microfluidic LLE platforms comprised of thiolene or a perfluoropolyether-based material, SIFEL, where the choice of materials was mainly guided by the need for solvent compatibility and fabrication amenability. Suitable designs for polymer-based LLE platforms that maximize extraction efficiencies within the constraints of the fabrication methods and feasible operational conditions were obtained using analytical modeling. To optimize the performance of the polymer-based LLE platforms, we systematically studied the effect of surface functionalization and of microstructures on the stability of the liquid-liquid interface and on the ability to separate the phases. As demonstrative examples, we report (i) a thiolene-based platform to determine the lipophilicity of caffeine, and (ii) a SIFEL-based platform to extract radioactive copper from an acidic aqueous solution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parallel-flow microfluidic platform; extraction of radiometals; functionalization of microchannels; lipophilicity of drugs; organic solvent compatibility; two-phase flow

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246730      PMCID: PMC4167834          DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem        ISSN: 0925-4005            Impact factor:   7.460


  49 in total

1.  Integration of a microextraction system solvent extraction of a Co-2-nitroso-5-dimethylaminophenol complex on a microchip.

Authors:  M Tokeshi; T Minagawa; T Kitamori
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Continuous-flow chemical processing on a microchip by combining microunit operations and a multiphase flow network.

Authors:  Manabu Tokeshi; Tomoko Minagawa; Kenji Uchiyama; Akihide Hibara; Kiichi Sato; Hideaki Hisamoto; Takehiko Kitamori
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Enzymatic degradation of p-chlorophenol in a two-phase flow microchannel system.

Authors:  Tatsuo Maruyama; Jun-ichi Uchida; Tomohiro Ohkawa; Toru Futami; Koji Katayama; Kei-ichiro Nishizawa; Ken-ichiro Sotowa; Fukiko Kubota; Noriho Kamiya; Masahiro Goto
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Solvent-resistant photocurable liquid fluoropolymers for microfluidic device fabrication [corrected].

Authors:  Jason P Rolland; R Michael Van Dam; Derek A Schorzman; Stephen R Quake; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  High-resolution soft lithography: enabling materials for nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Jason P Rolland; Erik C Hagberg; Ginger M Denison; Kenneth R Carter; Joseph M De Simone
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  A practical guide for the fabrication of microfluidic devices using glass and silicon.

Authors:  Ciprian Iliescu; Hayden Taylor; Marioara Avram; Jianmin Miao; Sami Franssila
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Initial study of two-phase laminar flow extraction chip for sample preparation for gas chromatography.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Dong Liang; Guanchao Liu; Min Guo; Wanli Xing; Jing Cheng
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 8.  Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications.

Authors:  Daniel Mark; Stefan Haeberle; Günter Roth; Felix von Stetten; Roland Zengerle
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 54.564

9.  Microfluidic platform for the generation of organic-phase microreactors.

Authors:  Zuzanna T Cygan; João T Cabral; Kathryn L Beers; Eric J Amis
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  A microfluidic chip based liquid-liquid extraction system with microporous membrane.

Authors:  Zeng-Xuan Cai; Qun Fang; Heng-Wu Chen; Zhao-Lun Fang
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 6.558

View more
  3 in total

1.  Atmospheric pressure atomic layer deposition to increase organic solvent resistance of PDMS.

Authors:  Albert Santoso; Afke Damen; J Ruud van Ommen; Volkert van Steijn
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.065

Review 2.  Core-shell nanoparticles used in drug delivery-microfluidics: a review.

Authors:  Zahra Mahdavi; Hamed Rezvani; Mostafa Keshavarz Moraveji
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Highly Fluorinated Methacrylates for Optical 3D Printing of Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Frederik Kotz; Patrick Risch; Dorothea Helmer; Bastian E Rapp
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.891

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.